This paper evaluates the symmetric and asymmetric relationships between military spending (MS) and oil imports (OIM) in China. In the long run, MS increases OIM, renewable energy (RE) consumption, and gross domestic product. OIM seem to have a non-linear and asymmetric impact on MS, both in the short run and the long run. It appears that China is prompt to reduce its MS considerably whenever it is assured of its energy security. This could be partially achieved by increasing its RE consumption, and the military sector is invited to contribute, especially through its R&D activities.
AhmedZAhmadMMurshedM, et al. (2022) The trade-off between energy consumption, economic growth, militarization, and CO2 emissions: does the treadmill of destruction exist in the modern world?Environmental Science and Pollution Research29: 18063–18076.
2.
Al-MulaliUFereidouniHGLeeJYM (2014) Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: evidence from Latin American countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews30: 290–298.
3.
AngJB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy35: 4772–4778.
4.
ApergisNGangopadhyayP (2020) The asymmetric relationships between pollution, energy use and oil prices in Vietnam: some behavioural implications for energy policy-making. Energy Policy140: 111430.
5.
ApergisNPayneJE (2011) The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Applied Energy88: 343–347.
6.
Ben JebliMFarhaniSGuesmiK (2020) Renewable energy, CO2 emissions and value added: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics53: 402–410.
7.
Ben YoussefS (2020) Non-resident and resident patents, renewable and fossil energy, pollution, and economic growth in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research27: 40795–40810.
8.
BildiriciME (2016) Defense, economic growth and energy consumption in China. Procedia Economics and Finance38: 257–263.
9.
BildiriciME (2017a) CO2 emissions and militarization in G7 countries: panel cointegration and trivariate causality approaches. Environment and Development Economics22: 771–791.
10.
BildiriciME (2017b) The causal link among militarization, economic growth, CO2 emission and energy consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research24: 4625–4636.
11.
BildiriciME (2017c) The effects of militarization on biofuel consumption and CO2 emission. Journal of Cleaner Production152: 420–428.
BoveVDeianaCNisticoR (2018) Global arms trade and oil dependence. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization34: 272–299.
14.
BrownRLDurbinJEvansJM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B37: 149–163.
15.
ChenYWangZZhongZ (2019) CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy131: 208–216.
16.
ClarkBJorgensonAKKentorJ (2010) Militarization and energy consumption: a test of treadmill of destruction theory in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology40: 23–43.
17.
DickeyDAFullerWA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association74: 427–431.
18.
Energy Information Administration (2021) International energy outlook. Available at: www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo
19.
FanWHaoY (2020) An empirical research on the relationship amongst renewable energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in China. Renewable Energy146: 598–609.
20.
Inglesi-LotzRDoganE (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of sub-Saharan Africa’s Big 10 electricity generators. Renewable Energy123: 36–43.
21.
Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (2017) China’s global renewable energy expansion. Available at: www.ieefa.org
22.
International Energy Agency (2019) World energy investment 2019. Available at: iea.org/wei2019
23.
IsiksalAZ (2021) Testing the effect of sustainable energy and military expenses on environmental degradation: evidence from the states with the highest military expenses. Environmental Science and Pollution Research28: 20487–20498.
24.
JorgensonAKClarkBKentorJ (2010) Militarization and the environment: a panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970–2000. Global Environmental Politics10: 7–29.
25.
KocaarslanBSoytasMASoytasU (2020) The asymmetric impact of oil prices, interest rates and oil price uncertainty on unemployment in the US. Energy Economics86: 104625.
26.
LiaoXBaekJ (2020) Analyzing the asymmetric effects of crude oil price changes on China’s petroleum product prices. The Singapore Economic Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1142/S021759081950070X
27.
LinBMoubarakM (2014) Renewable energy consumption: economic growth nexus for China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews40: 111–117.
28.
LongXNaminseEYDuJ, et al. (2015) Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews52: 680–688.
29.
Menla AliFDimitrakiO (2014) Military spending and economic growth in China: a regime-switching analysis. Applied Economics46: 3408–3420.
30.
MohamedHBen JebliMBen YoussefS (2019) Renewable and fossil energy, terrorism, economic growth, and trade: evidence from France. Renewable Energy139: 459–467.
31.
NusairSA (2020) The asymmetric effects of oil price changes on unemployment: evidence from Canada and the U.S. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries21: e00153.
32.
OzturkIAcaravciA (2010) The causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania: evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Applied Energy87: 1938–1943.
33.
PesaranMHPesaranB (1997) Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
PesaranMHSmithRP (1998) Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of Economic Surveys12: 471–505.
35.
PesaranMHShinYSmithRJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics16: 289–326.
36.
PhillipsPCBPerronP (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika75: 335–346.
37.
SadorskyP (2012) Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Economics34: 476–488.
38.
SamarasCNuttallaWJBaziliancM (2019) Energy and the military: convergence of security, economic, and environmental decision-making. Energy Strategy Reviews26: 100409.
39.
ShahbazMShahzadSJHAlamS, et al. (2018) Globalisation, economic growth and energy consumption in the BRICS region: the importance of asymmetries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development27: 985–1009.
40.
ShahbazMSolarinSAHammoudehS, et al. (2017) Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural breaks: the role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Economics68: 548–565.
41.
ShinYYuBGreenwood-NimmoM (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In:SicklesRCHorraceWC (eds) Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications. New York: Springer, pp.281–314.
42.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2021) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/
43.
SolarinSAAl-MulaliUOzturkI (2018) Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research25: 30949–30961.
44.
TianNKuimovaADa SilvaDL, et al. (2020) Trends in world military expenditure, 2019: SIPRI fact sheet. Available at: www.sipri.org
45.
WangKSuC (2021) Does high crude oil dependence influence Chinese military expenditure decision-making?Energy Strategy Reviews35: 100653.
46.
WangKSuCLobonţO, et al. (2021) Whether crude oil dependence and CO2 emissions influence military expenditure in net oil importing countries?Energy Policy153: 112281.
47.
WezemanPDFleurantAKuimovaA, et al. (2019) Trends in international arms transfers, 2018: SIPRI fact sheet. Available at: www.sipri.org
ZhangDWangJLinY, et al. (2017) Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews76: 865–871.
