This article seeks to theorise power and change within informal settlements, manifesting across twin functions of leadership and representation. Adapting the Bourdieusian framework of class-formation, this research locates disproportionate concentration of symbolic resources that initially influence leadership roles but are soon subject to (re)evaluation following the emergence of an educated, dynamic and youthful class. Failure to coherently outline leadership functions de-stabilises the system and prompts multiple nodes of leadership/representation to emerge. Lessons from the paper are consistent with findings around informal settlements that privilege intra-settlement contradictions as key variable(s) in frustrating efforts by planning agencies to consistently apply uniform standards of negotiations. Equally, multiple points of representation prompt a (re)conceptualisation of the margins as rigidly opposed to the local state, instead highlighting tendencies of collaboration/contestation that underline the objective of the urban-poor to get by.
AnjariaJS (2009) Guardians of the Bourgeois City: citizenship, public space, and middle-class activism in Mumbai. City & Community8(4): 391–406.
2.
AuerbachAM (2020) Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India’s Urban Slums. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AuerbachAMThachilT (2018) How clients select brokers: competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review112(4): 775–791.
4.
BaileyFG (2001) Treasons, Stratagems and Spoils: How Leaders Make Practical Use of Values and Beliefs. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
BanerjeeS (2012) India’s ‘revanchist’ cities. Economic and Political Weekly47(51): 13–15.
6.
Banerjee-GuhaS (2009) Neoliberalising the ‘urban’: new geographies of power and injustice in Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly44(22): 95–107.
7.
Benit-GbaffouC (2008) Practices of local participation Johannesburg-side-lining the institutional participatory channels?Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa66(1): 1–34.
8.
Benit-GbaffouC (2011) ‘Up close and personal’-how does local democracy help the poor access the state? Stories of accountability and clientelism in Johannesburg. Journal of Asian and African Studies46(5): 453–464.
9.
Benit-GbaffouCKatsauraO (2014) Community leadership and the construction of political legitimacy: unpacking Bourdieu’s ‘political capital’ in post apartheid Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(5): 1807–1832.
10.
BhanG (2016) In the Public’s Interest: Evictions, Citizenship and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
11.
BourdieuP (1984 [1979]) Distinction: A Social Critique on the Judgement of Taste (trans. NiceR). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BourdieuP (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society14(6): 723–744.
13.
BourdieuP (1987) What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkley Journal of Sociology32: 1–17.
14.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
15.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (trans. RaymondGAdamsonM). Cambridge: Polity Press.
De WitJBernerE (2009) Progressive patronage? Municipalities, NGOs, CBOs and the limits to slum dwellers’ empowerment. Development and Change40(5): 927–947.
22.
DrivdalL (2016) Community leadership in urban informal neighbourhoods: micro-politics and micro-administration in informal settlements in Cape Town. Urban Forum27: 275–295.
23.
DubeyS (2016) Understanding participation in a heterogenous community: the resettlement of Kathputli Colony. In: ChakravartySNegiR (eds) Space Planning and Everyday Contestations in Delhi: Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. New Delhi: Springer, pp.35–56.
24.
DupontVGowdaMMS (2020) Slum-free city versus durable slums. Insights from Delhi, India. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development12(1): 34–51.
25.
DupontVGowdaMS (2021) Impact of resettlement in the Kathputli Colony transit camp. India Housing Report, 4May, p. 4.
26.
DupontVBandaSVaidyaY, et al. (2014) Unpacking participation in Kathputli Colony: Delhi’s First Slum Redevelopment Project, Act I. Economic and Political Weekly49(24): 39–47.
27.
GhertnerDA (2015) Rule by Aesthetics: World-class City Making in Delhi. New York: Oxford University Press.
HellerPMukhopadhyayPBandaSSheikhS (2015) Exclusion, Informality, and Predation in the Cities of Delhi: An Overview of the Cities of Delhi Project. Delhi: Centre for Policy Research. p. 5.
30.
HolstonJ (2011) Contesting privilege with right: the transformation of differentiated settlement in Brazil. Citizenship Studies15(3–4): 335–352.
31.
KatsauraO (2012) Community governance in urban South Africa: spaces of political contestation and coalition. Urban Forum23(3): 319–342.
32.
KitscheltHWilkinsonS (eds) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MiraftabF (2004) Invited and invented spaces of participation: neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics. Wagadu1: 1–7.
35.
MunroH (2008) When do community leaders make a difference? Exploring the interaction of actors and institutions. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
36.
PilavskyA (2014) Introduction. In: PilavskyA (ed.) Patronage as Politics in South Asia. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–35.
37.
PorterL (2014) Possessory politics and the conceit of procedure: exposing the cost of rights under conditions of dispossession. Planning Theory13(4): 387–406.
38.
RamanB (2015) The politics of property in land: new planning instruments, law and popular groups in Delhi. Journal of South Asian Development10(3): 369–395.
39.
RoyA (2009) Why India cannot plan its cities: informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory8(1): 76–87.
40.
RoyA (2011) Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(2): 223–238.
41.
SadanandanA (2012) Patronage and decentralization: the politics of poverty in India. Comparative Politics44(2): 211–228.
42.
Uhl-BienM (2006) Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly17: 654–676.
43.
VivierESanchez-BetancourtD (2020) Community leaders as intermediaries: how everyday practices create and sustain leadership in five informal settlements in Cape Town. Leadership16(6): 738–756.
