This paper, using data from Census 2011, examines the availability of treated drinking water, latrine facility, drainage facility and electricity between villages, census towns (CTs) and statutory towns (STs) in West Bengal, India. Urban areas of socio-economically developed administrative divisions experienced higher household service coverage. Availability of drinking water and latrine facilities is distinctly better in STs over CTs and CTs over villages. Other services like latrine with sewerage facilities and closed drainage facilities recorded insignificant differences in household coverage between cities and villages. Results of multi-variable regression models reveal that type of economic activities and social characteristics of the urban areas; nature of basic services and their institutional arrangements significantly influence the service provision. So, the paper argues for stepping up investment, institutionalization of an integrated planning paradigm and strengthening urban governments to ensure equitable distribution of basic services.
BasuAMSharmaR (2021) Urban-rural dichotomy in planning: review of legal framework on four states of India. Indian Journal of Public Administration67(1): 40–53.
2.
BhagatRB (2011) Urbanisation and access to basic amenities in India. Urban India31(1): 1–14.
3.
ChatterjeeM (2016) Small and medium towns in West Bengal: issues in urban governance and planning. IASSI Quarterly35(3–4): 353–370.
4.
ChattopadhyayS (2012) Decentralization and delivery of urban basic services: the West Bengal experience. Development in Practice22(1): 57–70.
5.
ChattopadhyaySDasM (2018) Urban service delivery in West Bengal: current scenario and new challenges. Journal of Infrastructure Development10(1–2): 18–36.
6.
ChattopadhyaySDasM (2020) Analysing disparities in access to urban basic services under decentralised governance evidence from West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly55(26–27): 71–78.
7.
ChoithaniCDuijneRJVNijmanJ (2021) Changing livelihoods at India’s rural-urban transition. World Development146: 105617.
8.
DasASusantonoB (2022) Learning from informality during Covid-19. In: DasASusantonoB (eds) Informal Services in Asian Cities. Manila, Philippines: ADBI and ADB, pp.364–387.
9.
DasADasMBarmanH (2019) Access to basic amenities and services to urban households in West Bengal: does its location and size of settlements matter?GeoJournal6: 1–29.
10.
DasMChattopadhyayS (2020) Understanding peoples’ participation in urban local governments in West Bengal. Development in Practice30(1): 68–79.
11.
DeINagT (2016) Dangers of decentralisation in urban slums: a comparative study of water supply and drainage service delivery in Kolkata India. Development Policy Review34(2): 253–276.
12.
De BercegolR (2017) Small Towns and Decentralisation in India: Urban Local Bodies in the Making. New Delhi, India: Springer.
13.
DenisEMukhopadhyayPZérahMH (2012) Subaltern urbanisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly47(30): 52–62.
14.
DubeyAGangopadhyaySWadhwaW (2001) Occupational structure and incidence of poverty in Indian towns of different sizes. Review of Development Economics5(1): 49–59.
15.
EllisPRobertsM (2016) Leveraging Urbanization in South Asia Managing Spatial Transformation for Prosperity and Livability. Washington, DC: World Bank.
16.
Government of West Bengal (2004) West Bengal Human Development Report 2004. Kolkata, India: Development and Planning Department.
17.
GuinD (2017) Urban transition in West Bengal, India. Journal of Asian and African Studies52(8): 1258–1276.
18.
GuinD (2019) Contemporary perspectives of small towns in India: a review. Habitat International86: 19–27.
19.
HaqueI (2016) Infrastructure development and access to basic amenities in class I cities of West Bengal, India: insights from census data. Journal of Infrastructure Development8(1): 36–84.
20.
JainM (2018) Contemporary urbanization as unregulated growth in India: the story of Census Towns. Cities73: 117–127.
21.
JainMKorzhenevychA (2022) The concept of planetary urbanization applied to India’s rural to urban transformation. Habitat International129: 102671.
22.
KunduABagchiSKunduD (1999) Regional distribution of infrastructure and basic amenities in urban India: issues concerning empowerment of local bodies. Economicand Political Weekly34(28): 1893–1906.
23.
MitraANagarJP (2018) City size, deprivation and other indicators of development: evidence from India. World Development106: 273–283.
24.
MondalSDasDN (2022) Availability of basic amenities to urban households in West Bengal: an analysis of level and determinants. Geojournal87: 2863–2882.
25.
MukhopadhyayP (2017) Does administrative status matter for small towns in India? In: DenisEZérahMH (eds) Subaltern Urbanization in India: An Introduction to the Dynamics of Ordinary Towns: 2017. New Delhi, India: Springer, pp. 443–469.
26.
NSSO (2012) A Report on Particulars of Urban Slums in West Bengal, 2012. Kolkata, India: Bureau of Applied Economics and Statistics, Government of West Bengal.
27.
PradhanKC (2013) Unacknowledged urbanisation. Economic and Political Weekly48(36): 43–51.
28.
RaoGBirdR (2014) Governance and fiscal federalism. In: AhluwaliaIJKanburRMohantyPK (eds) Urbanization in India Challenges, Opportunities and the Way Forward. New Delhi, India: SAGE, pp.203–229.
29.
SamantaG (2014) The politics of classification and the complexity of governance in census towns. Economic and Political Weekly49(22): 55–62.
30.
SharmaK (2012) Rejuvenating India’s small towns. Economic and Political Weekly47(30): 63–68.
31.
SivaramakrishnanKC (2015) Governance of Megacities – Fractured Thinking, Fragmented Setup. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
32.
WatsonV (2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning – the difference. Planning Theory & Practice15(6): 62–76.
