Each year, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA), Pakistan issues a special 10-day hunting permit to royal family members of Gulf countries for seasonal hunting of Asian Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis macqueen). This paper attempts to systematically present the understandings on seasonal land grabbing and its political economy in Pakistan. The role of local elites and government institutions and the response of local people, as well as their resistance, is discussed in detail.
AhmadS (2016) Farmers mount protest against Qatari hunters over damage to crop. Dawn, 10December. Available at: https://www.dawn.com/news/1301587
2.
AhmedOS (2016) The legal status of hunting houbara bustards by foreign dignitaries. LUMS Law Journal3: 51–60.
3.
AtaSBShahbazMAWattoMT, et al. (2019) Short-term land acquisition, long-term impacts: the case of Houbara bustard Hunting in Pakistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies54: 390–408.
4.
BernsteinHByresTJ (2001) From peasant studies to agrarian change. Journal of Agrarian Change1(1): 1–56.
5.
Bhagwandas (2014) Arab royal hunts down 2,100 Houbara bustards in three week Safari. Dawn, 21April. Available at: http://www.dawn.com/news/1101272
BorrasSM (2009) Agrarian change and peasant studies: changes, continuities and challenges: an introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies36(1): 5–31.
8.
BorrasSMFrancoJC (2010) From threat to opportunity? Problems with the idea of a “code of conduct” for land-grabbing. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal13(2): 7.
9.
BorrasSMFrancoJCGómezS, et al. (2012) Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Journal of Peasant Studies39(3–4): 845–872.
10.
BorrasSMJrMillsENSeufertP, et al. (2020) Transnational land investment web: land grabs, TNCs, and the challenge of global governance. Globalizations17(4): 608–628.
11.
BrohiN (2010) Gender and Land Reforms in Pakistan Working Paper Series # 17. Islamabad, Pakistan: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
12.
BorrasSMFrancoJC (2012) Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change12(1): 34–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.
13.
BorrasSMHallRScoonesI, et al. (2011) Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies38(2): 209–216.
14.
CotulaLVermeulenSLeonardR, et al. (2009) Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa. London; Rome: IIED/FAO/IFAD.
15.
CotulaLOyaCCodjoeEA, et al. (2014) Testing claims about large land deals in africa: findings from a Multi-Country Study, The Journal of Development Studies50(7): 903–925.
16.
de GustavoLTOliveiraBMMcKayJL (2021) Beyond land grabs: new insights on land struggles and global agrarian change. Globalizations18(3): 321–338.
17.
DeiningerKByerleeDLindsayJ, et al. (2011) Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits?Washington, DC: World Bank.
18.
EdelmanM (2013) Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. Journal of Peasant Studies40: 485–501.
19.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2014) Land Cover Atlases of Pakistan: The Punjab Province. Washington, DC: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States.
20.
FriisCNielsenJØ (2016) Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: exploring the case of chinese banana investments in Northern laos. Land Use Policy57: 117–129.
21.
GeislerC (2015) Trophy lands: why elites acquire land and why it matters. Canadian Journal of Development Studies36(2): 241–257.
22.
Government of Punjab / International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2017) IFAD Assisted-Southern Punjab Poverty Alleviation Project (SPPAP). Planning & Development Department. Government of Punjab, IFAD. Available at: http://www.pndpunjab.gov.pk/system/files/SPPAPpdf
GRAIN (2008) Seized! The 2008 Land Grab for Food and Financial Security. GRAIN Briefing October 2008.
25.
HallREdelmanMBorrasSM, et al. (2015) Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions “from below.”Journal of Peasant Studies42(3–4): 467–488.
KeeneSWalsh-DilleyMWolfordW, et al. (2015) A view from the top: examining elites in large-scale land deals. Canadian Journal of Development Studies36(2): 131–146.
LambinEFMeyfroidtP (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108: 3465–3472.
30.
LevienM (2011) The land question: Special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. Paper presented at international conference on ‘Global Land Grabbing’ at the institute of development studies (UK), 6–8 April 2011.
31.
LiTM (2011) Centering labor in the land grab debate. The Journal of Peasant Studies38(2): 281–298.
32.
LiversageH (2010) Responding to “Land Grabbing” and Promoting Responsible Investment in Agriculture. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
33.
LocherM (2015) The ‘Global Land Rush’, Local Land Rights and Power Relations: European Forestry Investments in Tanzania. PhD Dissertation. University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
34.
LocherMSulleE (2014) Challenges and methodological flaws in reporting the global land rush: Observations from Tanzania. The Journal of Peasant Studies41(4): 569–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.919263
35.
McMichaelP (2009) A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies36(1): 139–169.
36.
NeefATouchS (2016) Local responses to land grabbing and displacement in rural Cambodia. In: PriceSSingerJ (eds) Global Implications of Development, Disasters and Climate Change: Responses to Displacement from Asia–Pacific. London: Routledge, pp.124–141.
37.
NevilleKJDauvergneP (2012) Biofuels and the politics of map making. Political Geography31: 279–289.
38.
OyaC (2013a) Methodological reflections on “Land Grab” databases and the “Land Grab” literature “Rush”. The Journal of Peasant Studies40: 503–520.
39.
OyaC (2013b) The Land Rush and Classic Agrarian Questions of Capital and Labour: A systematic scoping review of the socioeconomic impact of land grabs in Africa, ThirdWorld34(9): 1532–1557.
PARC (2004) Perennial Rod-Kohi System Development and Management in Mithawan Watershed. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Agriculture Research Council.
42.
PiesseM (2020) Global Water Supply and Demand Trends Point Towards Rising Water Insecurity: Strategic Analysis Paper. Nedlands, WA, Australia: Future Directions International Pty Ltd.
43.
RizviMA (2013) Masters not friends: Land, labor and politics of place in rural Pakistan. PhD Thesis. Austin: University of Texas.
SalimA (2008) Peasant Land Rights Movements of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
46.
SchubigerE (2015) No matter how loud the frogs croak, the cow still drinks the water: ethnography of a large-scale land acquisition in West Kenya. Master’s thesis, Bern, Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern.
47.
ShaheenSAwanMSWaqasM, et al. (2012) Riding for survival: a worst form of human trafficking. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research12(7): 1004–1008.
48.
SiddiqaA (2007) Military Inc: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (2015a) Decision on CRPs.No.561, 568 to 570, 600 to 604 and 607/2015 etc. Announced in open Court on 22.01.2016 at Islamabad.
50.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (2015b) Decision on the C P No.145 of 2015. (Against the judgment dated 02.01.2015 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi passed in Const.PNo.D-806/14).
51.
TeklemariamDNyssenJAzadiH, et al. (2017) Commercial land deals and the interactions between investors and local people: evidence from western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy63: 312–323.
