The Lingering Effects of Losing and Nonvoting on Institutional Trust: An Analysis of South Korea

Abstract

To what extent do supporters of electoral losers and nonvoters maintain lower evaluations of institutions post-election? A sizable literature identifies a divergence in perceptions among winners and losers regarding democratic satisfaction, with few studies extending this to perceptions of other electoral and nonelectoral institutions nor to include nonvoters. The timing of the 2015 Asian Barometer survey in South Korea allows us to identify evaluation prior to Park Geun-Hye’s impeachment scandal. Analysis consistently finds that those who supported the losing presidential candidate in 2012 maintained lower evaluations of institutions, with inconsistent results regarding nonvoters.

Keywords

Public opinion losers’ consent president South Korea

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdelzadeh

(2014) The impact of political conviction on the relation between winning or losing and political dissatisfaction: Findings from Sweden. Sage Open 4(2): 1–14.

Altman

Pérez-Liñán

(2002) Assessing the quality of democracy: Freedom, competitiveness, and participation in eighteen Latin American countries. Democratization 9(2): 85–100.

Anderson

Guillory

(1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy. American Political Science Review 91(1): 66–81.

Anderson

Mendes

(2006) Learning to lose: Election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science 36(1): 91–111.

Anderson

Tverdova

(2001) Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review 22(4): 321–338.

Anderson

Blais

Bowler

, et al. (2005) Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blais

Gélineau

(2007) Winning, losing, and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies 55(2): 425–441.

Blais

Rubenson

(2013) The source of turnout decline: New values or new contexts? Comparative Political Studies 46(1): 95–117.

Blais

Gidengil

Nevitte

, et al. (2004) Where does turnout decline from? European Journal of Political Research 43(2): 221–236.

10.

Brown

Dutton

(1995) The thrill of victory, the complexity of defeat: Self-esteem and people’s emotional reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(4): 712–722.

11.

Brunell

Buchler

(2009) Ideological representation and competitive congressional elections. Electoral Studies 28(3): 448–57.

12.

Chang

ECC

Chu

Y-H

(2006) Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? The Journal of Politics 68(2): 259–271.

13.

Chang

Chu

Y-H

W-C

(2014) Consenting to lose or expecting to win? Inter-temporal changes in voters’ winner-loser status and satisfaction with democracy. In: Thomassen

(ed.) Elections and Representative Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 232–253.

14.

Chi

Kwon

(2016) The trust-eroding effect of perceived inequality: Evidence from East Asian new democracies. The Social Science Journal 53(3): 318–328.

15.

Cho

(2000) Regional Elections and Rational Voters. Seoul: Nanam.

16.

Cho

(2014a) Appraising the quality of democracy as a developmental phenomenon: How South Koreas appraise the quality of their democracy. Social Indicators Research 116: 699–712.

17.

Cho

(2014b) How well ordinary citizens understand democracy: The case of the South Korean electorate. Democratization 21(2): 195–219.

18.

Cho

Kim

(2016) Procedural justice and perceived electoral integrity: The case of Korea’s 2012 presidential election. Democratization 23(7): 1180–1197.

19.

Clarke

Dutt

Kornberg

(1993) The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in Western European democracies. Journal of Politics 55(4): 998–1021.

20.

Craig

Martinez

Gainous

, et al. (2006) Winners, losers, and election context: Voter responses to the 2000 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly 39(4): 579–592.

21.

Croissant

(2002) Strong presidents, weak democracy? Presidents, parliaments and political parties in South Korea. Korea Observer 33(1): 1–45.

22.

Curini

Jou

Memoli

(2012) Satisfaction with democracy and the winner–loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science 42(2): 241–261.

23.

Dalton

(2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Diamond

(2008) The democratic rollback. Foreign Affairs 87(March/April): 36–48.

25.

Diamond

Morlino

(2005) Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

26.

Ezrow

Xezonakis

(2011) Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies 44(9): 1152–1178.

27.

Franklin

Lyons

Marsh

(2004) Generational basis of turnout decline in established democracies. Acta Politica 39: 115–151.

28.

Fuchs

(1993) Trends of political support. In: Berg-Schlosser

Rytlewski

(eds) Political Culture in Germany. New York: St. Martin’s, pp. 232–269.

29.

Gray

Caul

(2000) Declining turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950 to 1997: The effects of declining group mobilization. Comparative Political Studies 33(9): 1091–1122.

30.

Hahm

C-B

(2008) Korea’s miraculous democracy. Journal of Democracy 19(3): 128–142.

31.

Hartlyn

McCoy

Mustillo

(2008) Electoral governance matters: Explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 38(8): 73–98.

32.

Hellman

(2011) A historical institutional approach to political party organization: The case of South Korea. Government and Opposition 46(4): 464–484.

33.

Himmelweit

Biberian

Stockdale

(1978) Memory for past vote: Implications of a study of bias in recall. British Journal of Political Science 8(3): 365–375.

34.

Hollander

(2014) The surprised loser: The role of electoral expectations and news media exposure in satisfaction with democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91(4): 651–668.

35.

Hooghe

Kern

(2017) The tipping point between stability and decline: Trends in voter turnout, 1950–1980–2012. European Political Science 16(4): 535–552.

36.

Howell

Justwan

(2013) Nail-biters and no-contests: The effect of electoral margins on satisfaction with democracy in winners and losers. Electoral Studies 32(2): 334–343.

37.

Huang

K-P

Lee

F-Y

Lin

T-M

(2013) Partisanship and institutional trust a comparative analysis of emerging democracies in East Asia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 9(1): 47–71.

38.

Jou

(2009) Political support from elections losers in Asian democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 5(2): 145–175.

39.

Kahneman

Wakker

Sarin

(1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 375–406.

40.

Kang

(2015) Inequality, the welfare system and satisfaction with democracy in South Korea. International Political Science Review 36(5): 493–509.

41.

Karpowitz

Quin Monson

Nielson

, et al. (2011) Political norms and the private act of voting. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(4): 659–685.

42.

Kerr

(2013) Popular evaluations of election quality in Africa: Evidence from Nigeria. Electoral Studies 32(4): 819–837.

43.

Kim

(2009) Cross-national analyses of satisfaction with democracy and ideological congruence. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19(1): 49–72.

44.

Kim

(2010) Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review 70(5): 801–810.

45.

Kornberg

Clarke

(1994) Beliefs about democracy and satisfaction with democratic government: The canadian case. Political Research Quarterly 47(3): 537–63.

46.

Lee

(2003) South Korea in 2002. Asian Survey 43(1): 64–77.

47.

Loewen

Blais

(2006) Testing publius’ federalism: Losers consent, winners Lament? Paper prepared for the Conference on the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 26 March, Seville. Available at: www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/LoewenBlais2006.pdf.

48.

McCurry

(2017) South Korea spy agency admits trying to rig 2012 presidential election. The Guardian, 4 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/04/south-koreas-spy-agency-admits-trying-rig-election-national-intelligence-service-2012.

49.

Moehler

(2009) Critical citizens and submissive subjects: Election losers and winners in Africa. British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 345–366.

50.

Nadeau

Blais

(1993) Accepting the election outcome: The effect on participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 553–563.

51.

Norris

(ed.) (1999) Critical Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.

52.

Park

C-M

(2004) Support for democracy in Korea: Its trends and determinants. AsiaBarometer. Working Paper Series No. 20. Available at: http://www.asianbarometer.org/publications//29ab9f43c1f0ce4e7beb115daaf7f70f.pdf.

53.

Park

C-M

(2009) Political discontent in South Korea. AsianBarometer. Working Paper Series No. 49. Available at: http://www.asianbarometer.org/publications//b9d8a6d5acb4a9081fe3459dfbacd0dd.pdf.

54.

Park

C-M

(2011) Political discontent in South Korea. International Review of Sociology 21(2): 391–412.

55.

Park

C-M

(2017) Political trust in the Asia-Pacific region. In: Zmerli

van der Meer

TWG

(eds) Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 220–225.

56.

Park

(2010) Party mergers and splits in new democracies: The case of South Korea. Government and Opposition 45(4): 531–552.

57.

Rich

(2015) Losers’ consent or non-voter consent? Satisfaction with democracy in East Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science 23(3): 243–259.

58.

Rich

(2019) Explaining the success of the people’s party: An analysis of South Korea’s 2016 legislative elections. Asian Politics & Policy 11(1): 27–42.

59.

Rich

Holmes

(2016) Winning is not everything: Public perceptions of losers and non-voters in South Africa. Acta Politica 51(3): 328–345.

60.

Roh

(2017) The incumbency disadvantage in South Korean national assembly elections: Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies 46: 112–122.

61.

Ruiz-Rufino

(2013) Satisfaction with democracy in multi-ethnic countries: The effect of representative political institutions on ethnic minorities. Political Studies 61(1): 101–118.

62.

Sang-Hun

(2013) Prosecutors detail attempt to sway South Korean election. The New York Times, 21 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/22/world/asia/prosecutors-detail-bid-to-sway-south-korean-election.html.

63.

SCS (2014) Red-handed. The Economist, 21 March. Available at: https://www.economist.com/banyan/2014/03/21/red-handed.

64.

Shin

Cho

(2010) How East Asians understand democracy: From a comparative perspective. ASIEN: The German Journal on Contemporary Asia 116(July): 21–40.

65.

Singh

Lago

Blais

(2011) Winning and competitiveness as determinants of political support. Social Science Quarterly 92(3): 695–709.

66.

Singh

(2014) Not all elections winners are equal: Satisfaction with democracy and the nature of the vote. European Journal of Political Research 53(2): 308–327.

67.

Singh

Karakoç

Blais

(2012) Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies 31(1): 201–211.

68.

Son

(2016) Are the poor the weak link? Democratic support and income levels in post-crisis South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies 16(2): 219–237.

69.

Tavits

(2008) Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies 41(12): 1607–1630.

70.

Thaler

(1994) The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

71.

Wagner

DuFour

Schneider

(2003) Satisfaction not guaranteed: Institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe. CESIFO Working Paper No. 910.

72.

Whitehead

(2007) The challenge of closely fought elections. Journal of Democracy 18(2): 14–28.

73.

Wilson

Kerr

(1999) Affective responses to success and failure: A study of winning and losing in competitive rugby. Personality and Individual Differences 27(1): 85–99.

74.

Wong

Wan

P-S

Hsiao

M H-H

(2011) The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review 32(3): 263–281.

75.

Wright

(1993) Errors in measuring vote choice in the National Election Studies, 1952–88. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 291–316.

76.

Yun

Min

(2012) Democracy in South Korea: Consolidated but in deficit. Korea Observer 43(1): 145–174.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB