Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper critiques the poverty scorecard (PSC), a monetary-based tool for measuring poverty that has been adopted by community development programmes and participatory non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 66 countries including Pakistan. Drawing on 15 interviews and five focus group discussions conducted with the staff members and community members of Frontier Organization for Rural Development, a participatory NGO in Pakistan, I argue that it uses clouds intra-household power and resources distribution thereby furthering gender, class, and ethnic inequalities. Instead of solely relying on the PSC, the paper suggests supplementing it with participatory methods.

Keywords

Rural poverty poverty scorecard participatory poverty assessment gender blindness methodological issues Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel-Smith

Townsend

(1972) The poor and the poorest. In: Roach

Roach

(eds) Poverty: Selected Readings. London: Penguin Books, 138–150.

Agarwal

(1986) Women, poverty and agricultural growth in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies 13(4): 165–220.

Alcock

(2006) Understanding Poverty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Aldashev

Navarra

(2018) Development NGOs: Basic facts. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 89(1): 125–156.

Arksey

Knight

(1999) Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. London: SAGE Publications.

Banks

Hulme

Edwards

(2015) NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development 66: 707–718.

Bano

(2008) Dangerous correlations: Aid’s impact on NGOs’ performance and ability to mobilize members in Pakistan. World Development 36(11): 2297–2313.

Bano

(2012) Breakdown in Pakistan: How Aid is Eroding Institutions of Collective Welfare. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Baulch

(1996) Neglected trade-offs in poverty measurement. IDS Bulletin 27(1): 36–42.

10.

Bazeley

Jackson

(2013) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVIVO. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

11.

Bebbington

Hickey

Mitlin

(eds) (2008) Can NGOs Make a Difference? The Challenge of Development Alternatives. London: Zed Books.

12.

Burawoy

(1998) The extended case method. Sociological Theory 16(1): 4–33.

13.

Chambers

(1994a) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development 22(9): 1253–1268.

14.

Chambers

(1994b) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development 22(10): 1437–1454.

15.

Chambers

(1994c) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953–969.

16.

Chambers

(2002a) Participatory Workshops: A Sourcebook of 21 Sets of Ideas and Activities. London: Earthscan.

17.

Chambers

(2002b) Relaxed and Participatory Appraisal: Notes on Practical Approaches and Methods for Participants in PRA/PLA-related Familiarization Workshops. Available at: http://courses.washington.edu/pbaf531/Chambers_PRA_Notes.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016).

18.

Commins

(1999) NGOs: Ladles in the global soup kitchen? Development in Practice 9(5): 619–622.

19.

Cooke

(2002) The social psychological limits of participation. In: Cooke

Kothari

(eds) Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed, 102–121.

20.

Cooke

Kothari

(2002) Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.

21.

Denzin

(2019) The Qualitative Manifest: A Call to Arms. New York: Routledge.

22.

Durr-e-Nayab Farooq

(2014) Effectiveness of cash transfer programs for household welfare in Pakistan: The case of the Benazir Income Support Program. The Pakistan Development Review 53(2): 145–174.

23.

Ebrahim

(2003) NGOs and Organisational Change: Discourse, Reporting and Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Frontier Organization for Rural Development (2009) Livelihood Development Program (Project Proposal). Islamabad: Frontier Organization for Rural Development.

25.

Frontier Organization for Rural Development (2011) Annual Report: Livelihood Strengthening Program. Islamabad: Frontier Organization for Rural Development.

26.

Frontier Organization for Rural Development (n.d) Poverty Score Card: Four Districts Under Poverty Alleviation Program. Islamabad: Frontier Organization for Rural Development.

27.

Gazdar

(2011) Social protection in Pakistan: In the midst of a paradigm shift? Economic and Political Weekly 46(28): 59–66.

28.

Gazdar

Zuberi

(2014) Final Report of the Beneficiary Feedback Survey, National Cash Transfer Program – Pakistan. Karachi: Collective for Social Science Research. Available at: http://www.researchcollective.org/Documents/Updated_Anonymised_BFS_Final_Report_03022014.pdf (accessed 12 September 2019).

29.

Ginsburg

(2011) An Economic Interpretation of the Pashtunwali. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 2011(1): 89–114.

30.

Guijt

Shah

(1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London: IT Publications.

31.

Hearn

(1998) The ‘NGO-isation’ of Kenyan society: USAID & the restructuring of health care. Review of African Political Economy 25(75): 89–100.

32.

Hickey

Mohan

(2004) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Publishers.

33.

Holland

Brocklesby

Abugre

(2004) Beyond the technical fix? Participation in donor approaches to rights-based development. In: Hickey

Mohan

(eds) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Publishers, 252–268.

34.

Hussain

(2020) PTI govt sacks 4 grade-17 employees over BISP scam. The Express Tribune, 19 January. Available at: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2140069/1-pti-govt-sacks-4-grade-17-employees-bisp-scam/ (accessed 22 February 2020).

35.

Jamal

Baldwin

(2017) Angels of mercy or smiling western invaders? Community’s perception of NGOs in Northwest Pakistan. International Social Work 62(1): 89–104.

36.

Kabeer

(1991) Gender dimensions of rural poverty: Analysis from Bangladesh. The Journal of Peasant Studies 18(2): 241–262.

37.

Kabeer

(1996) Agency, well-being and inequality: Reflections on the gender dimensions of poverty. IDS Bulletin, 27.

38.

Kabeer

(1999) Targeting women or transforming institutions? Policy from NGO anti-poverty efforts. In: Eade

(ed.) Development with Women. London: Oxfam, 32–45.

39.

Kabeer

(2003) Gender Mainstreaming in Poverty Eradication and the Millennium Development Goals: A Handbook for Policymakers and other Stakeholders. Ottawa (Ontario): Commonwealth Secretariat, International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

40.

Kahlon

TUM

(2015) Governance in Pakistan: Legitimacy regime of NGOs. NDU Journal XXIX: 181–196.

41.

Kamberelis

Dimitriadis

(2014) Focus group research: Retrospect and prospects. In: Leavy

(ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–48.

42.

Kapoor

(2002) The devil’s in the theory: A critical assessment of Robert Chambers’ work on participatory development. Third World Quarterly 23(1): 101–117.

43.

Khan

(2004) Methods of assessment of rural poverty, projects and program impact: A handbook for practitioners in rural support programs. Rural Support Program Network (RSPN). Available at: http://www.rspn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Methods-of-Assessment-of-Rural-Poverty-Projects-and-Programmes-Impacts-A-Handbook-for-Practitioners-in-Rural-Support-Programmes-2004.pdf (accessed 2 April 2014).

44.

Kwadzo

(2010) Conceptualisation and measurement of poverty: A comparative analysis. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.

45.

Kwadzo

(2015) Choosing concepts and measurements of poverty: A comparison of three major poverty approaches. Journal of Poverty 19(4): 409–423.

46.

Laderchi

Saith

Stewart

(2003) Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies 31(3): 243–274.

47.

Lister

(2004) Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

48.

Mencher

(1972) The problem of measuring poverty. In: Roach

Roach

(eds) Poverty: Selected Readings. London: Penguine Books, 71–85.

49.

Mezzera

Aftab

Yusuf

(2010) Devolution Row: An Assessment of Pakistan’s 2001 Local Government Ordinance. Available at: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20101119_CRU_publicatie_mmezzera.pdf (accessed 1 April 2014).

50.

Millar

Glendinning

(1992) ‘It all really starts in the family’: Gender divisions and poverty. In: Glendinning

Millar

(eds) Women and Poverty in Britain: the 1990s. London/New York: Harvester Westsheaf, 3–10.

51.

Mosse

(1994) Authority, gender and knowledge: Theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal. Development and Change 25: 497–526.

52.

Owais

Sanauddin

Nawaz

, et al. (2015) Negotiating transparency and accountability of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. PUTAJ – Humanities & Social Sciences 22(2): 47–61.

53.

Pearce

(2010) Is social change fundable? NGOs and theories and practices of social change. Development in Practice 20(6): 621–635.

54.

Pearson

(2011) Integrating learning into organisational capacity development of Cambodian NGOs. Development in Practice 21(8): 1037–1049.

55.

Rahnema

(2010) Participation. In: Sachs

(ed.) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, 127–144.

56.

Rein

(1971) Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty. In: Townsend

(ed.) The Concept of Poverty. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, 46–63.

57.

Rietbergen-McCracken

Narayan

(1998) Participation and Social Assessment: Tools and Techniques. Washington, DC: World Bank.

58.

Rural Support Program Network (2018) Annual Report 2018. Available at: http://www.rspn.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/AR%20RSPN%202018.pdf (accessed 29 August 2019).

59.

Rural Support Program Network (2019) Meet Our Members. Available at: http://www.rspn.org/index.php/about-us/our-members/ (accessed 24 January 2019).

60.

Sahoo

(2013) Doing development or creating dependency? NGOs and civil society in India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36(2): 258–272.

61.

Schreiner

(2009) A simple poverty scorecard for Pakistan. Available at: http://www.simplepovertyscorecard.com/PAK_2005_ENG.pdf (accessed 3 May 2016).

62.

Schreiner

(2010) A simple poverty scorecard for Pakistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies 45(3): 326–349.

63.

Sen

(1983) Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers 35(2): 153–169.

64.

Thomas

(2000) Poverty and the ‘End of Development’. In: Allen

Thomas

(eds) Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. London: Oxford University Press, 3–22.

65.

Townsend

(1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.

66.

United Nations Development Programme (1997) Human Development Report. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-1997 (accessed 2 February 2015).

67.

Waglé

(2002) Rethinking poverty: Definition and measurement. International Social Science Journal 54(171): 155–165.

68.

Weiss

(1998) The slow yet steady path to women's empowerment in pakistan. In: Haddad

Esposito

(eds) Islam, Gender and Social Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 124–143.

69.

Weiss

(1999) Women, civil society and politics in Pakistan. Citizenship Studies 3(1): 141–150.

70.

Weiss

(2003) Interpreting Islam and women’s rights: Implementing CEDAW in Pakistan. International Sociology 18(3): 581–601.

71.

Williams

(2004) Evaluating participatory development: Tyranny, power and (re)politicisation. Third World Quarterly 25(3): 557–578.

72.

Yacobi

(2007) The NGOization of space: Dilemmas of social change, planning policy, and the Israeli public sphere. Environment and Planning: Society and Space 25(4): 745–758.

From Absolute Poverty to Participatory Poverty Assessment and Back Again? A Critique of Poverty Scorecard through a Case Study from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,Pakistan

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References