This study examines the existence and persistence of gender disparity in education in rural and urban India. We use the sequential logit model of regression on data sets provided by three rounds of quinquennial employment and unemployment surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). The findings of the study reveal that in both rural and urban sectors of India there is gender group disparity, and this disparity is greater in the rural sector than in the urban areas. Furthermore, it is also found that the gender groups’ disparity in education in India has substantially changed during the last two decades across both sectors.
BandyopadhyayMSubramanianR (2008) Gender equity in education: A review of trends and factors, create pathways to access. Research Monograph, No. 18. Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity. Available at: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/1866/1/PTA_18.pdf
4.
BarroRJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106(2): 407–443.
5.
BasantRShariffA (2010) The state of Muslims in India: An overview. In: BasantRShariffA (eds) Handbook of Muslims in India: Empirical and Policy Perspectives. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.
6.
BeckerGS (1975) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BhatPNMZavierF (1999) Findings of National Family Health Survey: Regional analysis. Economic and Political Weekly34: 3008–3032.
8.
BhaumikSKChakrabartyM (2011) Whither Human Capital?The Woeful Tale of Transition To Tertiary Education In India. Working Paper No. 1019. Michigan: The William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan.
9.
BlackSELynchLM (1996) Human-capital investments and productivity. American Economic Review – Papers and Proceedings of the 108th Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association86: 263–267.
10.
BourguignonFFerreiraFHGMenéndezM (2007) Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. The Review of Income and Wealth53(4): 585–618.
11.
BuisML (2009) Not all transitions are equal. The relationship between inequality of educational opportunities and inequality of educational outcomes. In: BuisML (ed.) Inequality of Educational Outcome and inequality of Educational Opportunity in the Netherlands during the 20th Century. Amsterdam: VU University, pp. 15–36.
12.
Census of India (2011) Primary Census Abstract. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner.
13.
DrèzeJMurthiM (2001) Fertility, education, and development: Evidence from India. Population and Development Review27(1): 33–63.
14.
DrèzeJSrinivasanPV (1997) Widowhood and poverty in rural India: Some inferences from household survey data. Journal of Development Economics54: 217–234.
15.
EvangelistaICarvalhoF (2008) Household Income as a Determinant of Child Labor and School Enrollment in Brazil: Evidence from a Social Security Reform. IMF working Paper, Paper No. WP/08/241. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
16.
FerreiraFGiganouxJ (2007) Inequality of Economic Opportunity in Latin America. Washington, DC: A Co-publication of Palgrave MacMillan and the World Bank.
17.
HanushekEAKimkoDD (2000) Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review90(5): 1184–1208.
18.
HanushekEAWoessmannL (2012) Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth17(4): 267–321.
19.
HanushekEAWoessmannL (2015) The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HausmanJAWiseDA (1978) A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica16(2): 403–426.
21.
HnatkovskaVLahiriAPaulS (2012) Castes and labor mobility. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics4(2): 274–307.
22.
HusainZSarkarS (2010) Gender Disparities in Educational trajectories in India: Do Girls Become More Robust at Higher levels?Social Indicators Research101: 37–56.
23.
KaulT (2018) Intra-household allocation of educational expenses: Gender discrimination and investing in the future. World Development108: 336–343.
24.
KingEMHillMA (1993) Women’s Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits, and Policies. The World Bank.
25.
KingEMLillardLA (1987) Education policy and schooling attainment in Malaysia and the Philippines. Economics of Education Review6(2): 167–181.
26.
KingdonGG (1998a) Does the labour market explain lower female schooling in India?Journal of Development Studies35(1): 39–65.
27.
KingdonGG (1998b) Education of Females in India: Determinants and Economic Consequences. Washington, DC: McNamara Fellowships Office of the World Bank.
28.
LockwoodMCollierP (1988) Maternal Education and the Vicious Cycle of High Fertility and Malnutrition: An Analytic Survey. Working Paper, Population and Human Resource Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Paper No. 130.
29.
MalhotraASchulerSRBoenderC (2002) Measuring Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in International Development. Washington, DC: Gender and Development Group, World Bank.
30.
McDougallL (2000) Gender gap in literacy in Uttar Pradesh: Questions for decentralized educational planning. Economic and Political Weekly35(19): 1649–1658.
31.
MincerJ (1958) Investment, human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy66(1): 281–321.
32.
McFaddenD (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics3(4): 303–328.
33.
MincerJ (1974) Schooling Experience and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
Ministry of Human Resource and Development (2009–10) Report on higher education in India. New Delhi, India.
35.
MurthiMGuioADrèzeJ (1997) Mortality, fertility, and gender bias in India: A district level analysis. Population and Development Review21: 745–782.
36.
PradhanBKRoyPKSalujaMR, et al. (2000) Rural-urban disparities: Income distribution, expenditure pattern and social sector. Economic and Political Weekly35: 2527–2539.
37.
Ray ChaudhuryA (2016) Interpreting the disparity in educational attainment among various socio-religious groups in India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review6(1): 1–17.
38.
RosenzweigMRSchultzTP (1982) Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intra-family resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. The American Economic Review72(4): 803–815.
39.
SatharZALloydCB (1994) Who gets primary schooling in Pakistan: Inequalities among and within families. The Pakistan Development Review33(2): 103–134.
40.
SchultzTW (1963) The Economic Value of Education. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
SchultzTW (1975) The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature13(3): 827–846.
42.
SinghA (2012) Inequality of opportunity in earnings and consumption expenditure: The case of Indian men. The Review of Income and Wealth58(1): 79–106.
43.
SubbaraoKRaneyL (1995) Social gains from female education: A cross-national study. Economic Development and Cultural Change44(1): 105–128.
44.
SubrahmanianR (2003) Promoting gender equality. In: BlackRWhiteH (eds) Targeting Development: Critical Perspectives on the MDGs. London: Routledge.
45.
TanselA (1997) School attainment, parental education and gender in Côte d‘Ivoire and Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change45(4): 825–856.
46.
TanselA (2002) Determinant of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, households and community factors. Economics of Education Review21: 455–470.
47.
TilakJBG (1987) Determinants of Household Expenditure on Education in Rural India. Working Paper Series No. 88. New Delhi: National Council of Applied Economic Research.
48.
TillyC (1998) Durable Inequalities. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
VaidD (2004) Gendered inequality in educational transitions. Economic and Political Weekly39(35): 3927–3938.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
