Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Based on the fourth wave of the Asian Barometer Survey, I examine the contours and determinants of East Asians’ role model choices. The results show that pro-authoritarianism rule, recognition of China’s regional hegemon status, perception of China’s soft-power image, admiration for good governance, or inward-looking nationalism make East Asians more likely to choose an alternative role model rather than the USA. If the USA should loom out of East Asians’ vision for their country role model, the alternative role models would carry consequences in a potential shift in the democratic regime paradigm and a possible change in the political landscape in East Asia.

Keywords

Attitudes toward authoritarian rule East Asia good governance nationalism regional hegemon role model choice soft power US

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beeson

(2012) Charmed or alarmed? Reading China’s regional relations. Journal of Contemporary China 21(73): 35–51.

Bell

(2015) The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Blank

Schmidt

(2003) National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology 24(2): 289–312.

Brands

(2019) Trump’s venom for US allies could take a toll this year. 29 January. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-29/trump-s-venom-for-u-s-allies-could-take-a-toll-this-year (accessed 5 August 2019).

Burkhart

Lewis-Beck

(1994) Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review 88(4): 903–910.

Capie

(2004) Between a hegemon and a hard place: The “war on terror” and Southeast Asian–US relations. Pacific Review 17(2): 223–248.

Cardoso

(1977) The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review 12(3): 7–24.

Cardoso

Faletto

(1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Carlson

Nelson

(2008) Anti-Americanism in Asia? Factors shaping international perceptions of American influence. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8(3): 303–324.

10.

Carothers

(2011) Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

11.

Chang

Chu

Welsh

(2013) Southeast Asia: Sources of regime support. Journal of Democracy 24(2): 150–164.

12.

Chang

Chu

Huang

(2011) Procedural quality only? Taiwanese democracy reconsidered. International Political Science Review 32(5): 598–619.

13.

Chen

Goodman

DSG

(2012) The China model: One country, six authors. Journal of Contemporary China 21(73): 169–185.

14.

Christensen

(2009) Shaping the choices of a rising China: Recent lessons for the Obama administration. Washington Quarterly 32(3): 89–104.

15.

Chu

Bratton

Lagos

, et al. (2008) Public opinion and democratic legitimacy. Journal of Democracy 19(2): 74–87.

16.

Chu

Kang

Huang

(2015) How East Asians view the rise of China. Journal of Contemporary China 24(93): 398–420.

17.

Clinton

(2011) America’s Pacific century. Foreign Policy 189(1): 56–63.

18.

Dahlström

Teorell

Dahlberg

, et al. (2015) The Quality of Government Expert Survey II Dataset. Sweden: University of Gothenburg: Quality of Government Institute.

19.

Dalton

Sin

Jou

(2007) Understanding democracy: Data from unlikely places. Journal of Democracy 18(4): 142–156.

20.

Diamond

Linz

Lipset

(eds) (1988) Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder: Lynn Rienner Publishers.

21.

Dian

(2015) The pivot to Asia, air–sea battle and contested commons in the Asia Pacific region. Pacific Review 28(2): 237–257.

22.

Ding

(2010) Analyzing rising power from the perspective of soft power: A new look at China’s rise to the status quo power. Journal of Contemporary China 19(64): 255–272.

23.

Economy

(2005) China’s rise in Southeast Asia: Implications for the United States. Journal of Contemporary China 14(44): 409–425.

24.

Foa

Mounk

(2017) The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy 28(1): 5–15.

25.

Freedom House (2019) Freedom in the World 2019: Democracy in Retreat. New York: Freedom House.

26.

Fukuyama

(2006) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

27.

Fukuyama

(2015) Why is democracy performing so poorly? Journal of Democracy 26(1): 11–20.

28.

Gassama

(1999) Transnational critical race scholarship: Transcending ethnic and national chauvinism in the era of globalization Nanook of the Nomos. A symposium on critical race Praxis. Michigan Journal of Race & Law 5(1): 133–160.

29.

Gerring

Bond

Barndt

, et al. (2005) Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics 57(3): 323–364.

30.

Glaser

Billingsley

(2012) US–China relations: Creating a new type of major power relations. Comparative Connections 14(2): 25.

31.

Gries

Zhang

Crowson

, et al. (2011) Patriotism, nationalism and China’s US policy: Structures and consequences of Chinese national identity. China Quarterly 205: 1–17.

32.

Hong

C-S

(2012) Challenging new conservative regimes in South Korea and Taiwan. Asian Survey 52(4): 643–665.

33.

Huntington

(1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

34.

Ikenberry

(2008) The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs 87(1): 23–37.

35.

(2010) China’s economic recovery and the China model. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 8(3): 215–226.

36.

Johnston

(2017) Is Chinese nationalism rising? Evidence from Beijing. International Security 41(3): 7–43.

37.

Kaufmann

Kraay

Mastruzzi

(2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Rochester: Social Science Research Network.

38.

Kent

(2013) China, the United Nations, and Human Rights: The Limits of Compliance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

39.

McFaul

(2004) Democracy promotion as a world value. Washington Quarterly 28(1): 147–163.

40.

Mummendey

Klink

Brown

(2001) Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology 40(2): 159–172.

41.

Nye

(2016) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.

42.

O’Donnell

(1988) Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

43.

Paradise

(2009) China and international harmony: The role of Confucius Institutes in bolstering Beijing’s soft power. Asian Survey 49(4): 647–669.

44.

Plate

(2013) Conversations with Lee Kuan Yew: Citizen Singapore: How to Build A Nation. Giants of Asia. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International (Asia) Pte.

45.

Plattner

(2015) Is democracy in decline? Journal of Democracy 26(1): 5–10.

46.

Reuters (2018) China blames the US for its militarization of artificial islands in the South China Sea. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/china-blames-us-for-its-militarization-of-artificial-islands-in-the-south-china-sea-2018-1 (accessed 26 August 2018).

47.

Rines

(2019) The trade war is not only about trade: Washington is in a long-game with Beijing over ideology and socioeconomic systems. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/trade-war-not-only-about-trade-58822 (accessed 26 October 2019).

48.

Robinson

(2013) Botswana as a role model for country success. In: Fosu

(ed.) Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 218–237.

49.

Singh

(2013) Democracy, diversity and development: India’s strategy and outcomes. In: Fosu

(ed.) Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–179.

50.

Smith

Kim

(2006) National pride in comparative perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(1): 127–136.

51.

Valencia

(2007) The East China Sea dispute: Context, claims, issues, and possible solutions. Asian Perspective 31(1): 127–167.

52.

Welsh

Chang

(2015) Choosing China: Public perceptions of “China as a model”. Journal of Contemporary China 24(93): 442–456.

53.

Williamson

(2009) A short history of the Washington Consensus preface. Law and Business Review of the Americas 15: 7–26.

54.

Wilson

(2015) Mega-regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP? Journal of Contemporary Asia 45(2): 345–353.

55.

Woo-Cummings

(1999) The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

56.

Yang

IH-H

Chen

(2016) Is China a model for Asia? A survey of public opinion in 13 East Asian states. Chinese Political Science Review 61: 1–27.

57.

Yeo

(2011) Activists, Alliances, and Anti-US Base Protests. New York: Cambridge University Press.

58.

Zhao

(2010) The China model: Can it replace the western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China 19(65): 419–436.

59.

Zoellick

(2005) Whither China: From membership to responsibility? NBR Analysis 16(4): 5.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

Is the USA the Only Role Model in Town? Empirical Evidence from the Asian Barometer Survey

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material