In this study we use the India Human Development Survey (2011–2012) data and Logit model analysis to investigate how far the affirmative action policy has helped in increasing the chances of representation of eligible individuals from scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and other backward classes in government jobs in India. Analysis of the data reveals that the reservation policy in government jobs in India has helped in increasing the chances of representation of people from these groups because they have a higher probability of representation in government jobs than upper caste (unreserved) individuals after controlling for individual and household characteristics.
AmemiyaT (1981) Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature19(4): 1483–1536.
2.
AzamMChinAPrakashN (2013) The returns to English-language skills in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change61(2): 335–367.
3.
BorooahVKDubeyAIyerS (2007) The effectiveness of jobs reservation: caste, religion and economic status in India. Development and Change38(3): 423–445.
4.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group, pp.241–258.
DarityWJr (2013) Confronting Those Affirmative Action Grumbles. Working paper series, no. 309. Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute.
8.
DarityWDeshpandeAWeisskopfT (2011) Who is eligible? Should affirmative action be group- or class-based?American Journal of Economics and Sociology70(1): 238–268.
9.
DasMBHallGKapoorS, et al. (2012) India: The Scheduled Tribes. In: HallGHPatrinosHA (eds) Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.205–248.
10.
DesaiSNoonJ (2007) Who gets good jobs? Exploring the nature of competition and social exclusion in India. Presented at theAnnual Meetings of the Population Association of America. New Orleans, LA.
11.
DesaiSVannemanR (2015) India Human Development Survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011-12. ICPSR36151-v2. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], p.31.
12.
DeshpandeA (2013) Social justice through affirmative action in India: An assessment. In: Wicks-LimJPollinR (eds) Capitalism on Trial: Explorations in the Tradition of Thomas E. Weisskopf. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.266–285.
13.
DubeySM (1975) Social Mobility Among the Professions. Bombay: Popular Prakashan Private Limited.
GuruG (2011) Social justice. In: JayalNGMehtaPB (eds) Oxford Companion to Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 361–380.
16.
HoutM (1988) More universalism, less structural mobility: The American occupational structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology93(6): 1358–1400.
NamYHuangJ (2009) Equal opportunity for all? Parental economic resources and children’s educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review31(6): 625–634.
25.
NamYHuangJSherradenM (2008) Asset definitions. In: MckernanSMSherradenM (eds) Asset Building and Low-income Families. Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press, pp.1–31.
26.
NayyarD (2011) Discrimination and justice: Beyond affirmative action. Economic and Political Weekly46(42): 52–59.
27.
NayyarD (2017) Employment Growth and Development: Essays on a Changing World Economy. New York: Routledge.
28.
PrakashN (2009) The Impact of Employment Quotas on the Economic Lives of Disadvantaged Minorities in India. Working Papers. Department of Economics, Dartmouth College. New Hampshire.
29.
RanaMS (2008) Reservations in India: Myths and Realities. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
30.
RodriguesV (ed.) (2002) The Essential Writings of B.R. Ambedkar. New Delhi: Oxford India Paperbacks.
31.
SenA (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
32.
SowellT (2004) Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study. New Haven: Yale University Press.
