Conventions,Courts,and Communities: Gender Equity,CEDAW and Religious Personal Law in India

Abstract

The Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women is central in outlining the gendered dimensions of human rights. India ratified this treaty with the reservation that it would be complied with only in accordance with the religious personal law. This article will examine the ways in which the convention interfaces with religious personal law, and the efficacy of the convention in both top-down and bottom-up reform of religious personal laws, as well as secular laws.

Keywords

Human rights women’s rights India CEDAW norms and practices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra, 2000(1) SLJ SC 65:AIR 1999 SC 625 (India). Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/856194/

Basu

(2015) The Trouble with Marriage: Feminists Confront Law and Violence in India. Oakland: University of California Press.

Census 2011 (2015) Sex ratio in India. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at: http://www.census2011.co.in/sexratio.php (accessed 25 June 2018).

Center for Reproductive Rights (2018) Ensuring Reproductive Rights: Reform to Address Women’s and Girls’ Need for Abortion After 20 Weeks in India. New York. Available at: https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/Post-20-Week-Access-to-Abortion-India-0218.pdf (accessed 10 July 2018).

Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (2012) Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Paries under Article 18 of the Convention: Combined Fourth and Fifth Periodic Reports of States Parties, India. Concluding Observations and Recommendations. CEDAW/C/IND/4-5. New York: United Nations. Available at: http://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/IND/4-5 (accessed 9 July 2018).

Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: India (2000) Concluding Observations and Recommendations. CEDAW/C/SR.452, 453 and 462. New York: United Nations. Available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw25years/content/english/CONCLUDING_COMMENTS/India/India-CO-1.pdf (accessed 7 July 2018).

Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: India (2007) Concluding Observations and Recommendations. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/3. New York: United Nations. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/720690/ (accessed 9 July 2018).

Concluding Comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: India (2014) Concluding Observations and Recommendations. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5. New York: United Nations. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/778815/files/CEDAW_C_IND_CO_4-5-EN.pdf (accessed 22 June 2018).

Danial Latifi Vs. Union of India, AIR (2001) SC 3958 (India). Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/women-and-justice/resource/danial_latifi_v_union_of_india

10.

Galanter

Jayanth

(2000) Personal law and human rights in India and Israel. Israel Law Review 34(1): 101–133.

11.

Gaurav Jain V. Union Of India & Ors [1989] Insc 344; Air 1990 Sc 292 (India). Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/40881001/

12.

Grindle

(2004) Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance 17(4): 525–548.

13.

Harel-Shalev

(2009) The problematic nature of religious autonomy to minorities in democracies – the case of India’s Muslims. Democratization 16(6): 1261–1281.

14.

Hasan

(2010) Gender, religion and democratic politics in India. Third World Quarterly 31(6): 939–954.

15.

Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (2000) 2 S.C.C. 228 (India). Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/women-and-justice/resource/githa_hariharan_v_reserve_bank_of_india

16.

Herklotz

(2017) Law, religion and gender equality: Literature on the Indian personal law system from a women’s rights perspective. Indian Law Review 1(3): 250–268.

17.

Indian Kanoon (2018) Search engine for Indian Law, 2018. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/ (accessed 3 October 2018).

18.

Jaising

(2010) The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and realisation of rights: reflections on standard settings and culture. In: Meena

Sarah

(eds) Without Prejudice: CEDAW and the Determination of Women’s Rights in a Legal and Cultural Context. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, pp.9–13.

19.

Keck

Kathryn

(1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

20.

Keck

Kathryn

(1999) Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51(159): 89–101.

21.

Law Commission of India (2008) 205th Report on Proposal to Amend the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 and Other Allied Laws. Report 205. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116780787/ (accessed 10 July 2018).

22.

Levitt

Sally

(2009) Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks 9(4): 441–461.

23.

MacKinnon

(2006) Sex equality under the constitution of India: Problems, prospects, and ‘personal laws.’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 4(2): 181–202.

24.

McCrudden

(2015) Why do national court judges refer to human rights treaties? A comparative international law analysis of CEDAW. American Journal of International Law 109(3): 534–550.

25.

Merry

(2003) Constructing a global law—violence against women and the human rights system. Law and Social Inquiry 28(4): 941–977.

26.

Merry

(2006) Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51.

27.

Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985) AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/40881001/

28.

Nussbaum

(2002) Sex, laws, and inequality: What India can teach the United States. Daedalus 131(1): 95–106.

29.

Parashar

(1992) Women and Family Law Reform in India: Uniform Civil Code and Gender Equality. New York: Sage.

30.

Parashar

(2013) Religious personal laws as non-state laws: Implications for gender justice. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 45(1): 5–23.

31.

Prabhu

(2017) Labour participation rate of women in India visibly low, says World Bank study. The Hindu, 17 April. Karnataka. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/labour-participation-rate-of-women-in-india-visibly-low-says-world-bank-study/article18075087.ece (accessed 28 June 2018).

32.

Rajagopal

(2017) Can women be given option of saying ‘no’ to triple talaq at the time of ‘nikahnama’, SC asks AIMPLB. The Hindu, 17 May. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/can-women-be-given-option-of-saying-no-to-triple-talaq-sc-asks-aimplb/article18472783.ece (accessed 11 July 2018).

33.

Rajaram

Vaishali

(2009) Translating women’s human rights in a globalizing world: The spiral process in reducing gender injustice in Baroda, India. Global Networks 9(4): 462–484.

34.

Ramachandran

Kameshwari

Radhika

(2014) Cartographies of empowerment: An introduction. In: Vimala

Kameshwari

(eds) Cartographies of Empowerment: The Mahila Samakhya Story. New Delhi: Zubaan Books, pp. 1–24.

35.

Rao

(2016) Reservations based on personal laws to CEDAW: A study of effect on the status of equality of women in India by comparing it with Afghanistan. Indian Law Institute Law Review 4: 49–64. Available at: http://www.ili.ac.in/pdf/p5_bhavana.pdf

36.

Saksena

(2007) CEDAW: Mandate for substantive equality. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 14(3): 481–498.

37.

Schabas

(1997) Reservations to the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women and the convention on the rights of the child. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law 3(1): 79–112.

38.

Shamima Farooqui vs Shahid Khan (2015) [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 6380-6381 of 2014] Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal NOS.564-565 OF 2015, Supreme Court of India. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/189967724/

39.

Shayara Bano vs Union Of India And Others (2017) New Delhi: Indian Kanoon. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/115701246/ (accessed 2 October 2018).

40.

Solanki

(2011) Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Subramanian

(2008) Legal change and gender inequality: Changes in Muslim family law in India. Law and Social Inquiry 33(3): 631–672.

42.

Taylor

(2001) Saving face: Acid attack laws after the U.N. convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 29(2): 395–426.

43.

Thakur

(1993) Ayodhya and the politics of India’s secularism: A double-standards discourse. Asian Survey 33(7): 645–664.

44.

The Global Gender Gap Report 2017 (2018) Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017/ (accessed 28 June 2018).

45.

Times of India (2017) Ravi Shankar Prasad: 100 cases of instant triple talaq in the Country since the SC judgement. 28 December. Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/66-cases-of-triple-talaq-in-the-country-since-the-sc-judgement-law-minister/articleshow/62279519.cms (accessed 11 July 2018).

46.

TNN (2018) Triple talaq: Woman given triple talaq over burnt chapati in UP. The Times of India, 10 July, 2018. Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/city/lucknow/woman-given-triple-talaq-over-burnt-chapati-in-up/videoshow/64926980.cms (accessed 11 July 2018).

47.

Tschalaer

(2017) Muslim Women’s Quest for Justice: Gender, Law and Activism in India. Delhi, New York: Cambridge University Press.

48.

United Nations (2018) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Depository, June 22, 2018. United Nations Treaty Collection. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&lang=en (accessed 22 June 2018).

49.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics (2011a) Literacy Rate, Adult Female (% of Females Ages 15 and above) | Data. World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.MA.ZS?end=2011&locations=IN&start=1981&view=chart (accessed 25 June 2018).

50.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics (2011b) Literacy Rate, Adult Male (% of Males Ages 15 and above) | Data. World Bank. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.MA.ZS?end=2011&locations=IN&start=1981&view=chart (accessed 25 June 2018).

51.

Vanegas

Lisa

(2011) CEDAW and rural development: empowering women with law from the top down, activism from the bottom up. University of Baltimore Law Review 41(2): 263.

52.

Vatuk

(2013) The ‘women’s court’ in India: An alternative dispute resolution body for women in distress. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 45(1): 76–103.

53.

Vishakha and others v. State of Rajasthan and others, AIR 1997, SC 3011 (India). Available at: https://www.iiap.res.in/files/VisakaVsRajasthan_1997.pdf

54.

Wilpf India (2013) Women’s rights in India: Alternative report for the 58th presessional working group of the CEDAW committee. New Delhi: Wilpf India. Available at: https://wilpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CombinedIndiaCoverEmail.pdf (accessed 10 July 2018).