A Post-colonial Analysis of India–United States Nuclear Security: Orientalism,Discourse,and Identity in International Relations

Abstract

This article uses Edward Said’s post-colonial framework to analyze India–United States (US) nuclear security relations in the post-Cold War period as a clash of US Orientalism and India’s nuclear sovereignty as a key marker of India’s post-colonial essence. Through an analysis of the discourses of India and the US with regard to India’s May 1998 detonation and the 123 Agreement, it explores the following questions: To what extent has America’s security relationship with India been characterized by Orientalist discourses? Does the revision of the US post-9/11 security relationship with India as evidenced through the 123 Agreement indicate continuity or change in America’s Orientalist discourses vis-à-vis the nuclear policies of the Indian state? How has this shaped India’s nuclear nationalism? In exploring these questions, it will be argued that US security discourses reflective of Orientalism have constructed India along Orientalist lines; have structured US security policies towards the nuclear strategies of the Indian state (thereby consolidating India’s nuclear nationalism); and, that the revision of the US security relationship with India post-9/11 shows a continuity of America’s Orientalism towards the Indian state and its nuclear program. The article concludes with an analysis of the implications of Orientalism on South Asian security/International Relations.

Keywords

Discourse India–United States relations Orientalism post-Cold War nuclear politics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

(2009) South Asian Cultures of the Bomb: Atomic Publics and the state in India and Pakistan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ashcroft

Ahluwalia

(1999). Edward Said: The Paradox of Identity. London: Routledge.

Barker

(1998) India and Pakistan lied about nuclear tests. Science (2 October). Available at: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/1998/oct/02/india-and-pakistan-lied-about-nuclear-tests [accessed 15 November 2014].

Biswas

(2007) Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium Journal of International Studies 36 (2007) 117–133.

Biswas

(2014) Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

BJP (2006) Press Statement of the BJP on the India-US Nuclear Deal (December 10). Available at: http://www.bjp.org/ (archive search) [accessed 1 November 2014].

Breckenridge

van der Veer

(1995) Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Burns

(1998) In nuclear India, small stash does not a ready arsenal make. The New York Times (26 July) Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/26/world/in-nuclear-india-small-stash-does-not-a-ready-arsenal-make.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm/ [accessed 16 November 2014].

Burns

(2008) The US and India: The New Strategic Partnership (Speech at the Asia Society, New York), October 18: 1–7.

10.

Bush

G.W

Vajpayee

(2001) Bush, Vajpayee Joint Press Conference (November 9). At: http://www.usindiafriensdship.net/archives/viewpints/bush-vajpayee-112001.html [accessed 15 November 2014].

11.

Bush

(2008) President Bush Signs H.R. 7081, the United States-India Nuclear Cooperation Approval and Nonproliferation Enhancement Act (8 October). Available at: http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081008–4.html/ [accessed 1 May 2015].

12.

Campbell

(1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Chacko

(2014) A new “special relationship?” power transitions, ontological security, and, India-US Relations. International Studies Perspectives 15: 329–346.

14.

Chari

(2006) Implementing the Indo-US. Nuclear Deal: A Pyrrhic Struggle (5 January). Available at: http://www.idsa.in/idsastrategiccomments/ImplementingtheIndoUSNuclearDeal_PRChari050106/ [accessed 12 December 2014].

15.

Chowdhry

(2007) Edward said and contrapuntal reading: Implications for critical interventions in international relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies 36(1): 101–116.

16.

CNN (1998) Clinton says India is on ‘wrong side of history’ with nuclear tests. CNN (16 May). Available at: http://www.cnn.com/US/9805/16/clinton.radio.address/ [accessed 11 November 2014].

17.

Cohen

(2001) India Emerging Power. Washington D.C: Brookings Institute Press.

18.

Council on Foreign Relations (2009) US nuclear weapon’s policy. Council on Foreign Relations (April) Available at: http://www.cfr.org/proliferation/us-nuclear-weapons-policy/p19226 [accessed 12 May 2015].

19.

Darby

(1987) Three Faces of Imperialism: British and American Approaches to Asia and Africa. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

20.

Das

(2012) The United States–India nuclear relations after 9/11: Alternative discourses. Asian Journal of Political Science 20 (1):86-107.

21.

Dixit

(1996) My South Block Years: Memoirs of a Foreign Secretary. New Delhi: UBS.

22.

Doty

(1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

23.

Ganguly

Shoup

Scobell

(eds) (2006) US–Indian Strategic Cooperation: Into the 21st Century. London and New York: Routledge.

24.

Gopalakrishnan

(2007) Amend US law, or reject nuclear deal (14 May). Available at: http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/may/14guest.htm/ [accessed 12 December 2014].

25.

Greenfield

(1998) They Won’t They Can’t. Newsweek (25 May). Available at: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2–661835.html/ [accessed 17 November 2014].

26.

Gusterson

(1999). Nuclear weapons and the other in the western imagination. Cultural Anthropology 14(1): 111–143.

27.

Hoagland

(1998a) Now the idea will be to blast Iraq’s weapons facilities. International Herald Tribune (19 January). Available at: http://www.internationalheraldtribune.com/ [accessed 30 March 2014].

28.

Hoagland

(1998b) Nuclear notice. The Washington Post ( 13 May). Available at: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2–657087.html [accessed 25 November 2014].

29.

Heristchi

(2005) The politics of dispossession, belonging, and, hope: Remembering Edward Said. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 30: 251–273.

30.

Hyde

(2006) The US–India ‘global partnership’: How significant for American interests? House International Relations Committee, November 16. Available at: http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa24598.000/hfa24598_0.htm/ [accessed 22 November 2014]

31.

International Affairs (2007) Introduction: Thinking about ‘enlightenment’ and ‘counter-enlightenment’ in nuclear policies. International Affairs 83(3): 427–574.

32.

Issacs

(1973) Scratches on Our Minds: American Images of China and India. Westport: Greenwood Press.

33.

Johnson

(2007) Cloud over US-India nuclear accord (3 June). Available at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/99cb1422-11ed-11dc-b963-000b5df10621.html/ [accessed 12 December 2014].

34.

Kumara

Jones

(2007) Indian prime minister calls Left Front’s bluff over Indo–US nuclear accord. World Socialist Website (16 August). Available at: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2007/08/indi-a16.html/ [accessed 12 November 2014].

35.

Klare

(1995) Rogue States and Nuclear Outlaws: America’s Search for a New Foreign Policy. New York: Hill and Wang.

36.

Krishna

(1999) Postcolonial Insecurities: India, Sri Lanka and the Question of Nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

37.

Krishnaswami

(2006). US Congress approves legislation on Indo–US nuclear deal. Available at: http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/us-congress-approves-legislation-on-indous-nuclear-deal/435984/ [accessed 10 May 2015].

38.

Kronstadt

(2007) India-US Relations. Congressional Research Service Report for the Congress (27 June). Available at: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/80669.pdf/ [accessed 25 November 2014].

39.

LePoer

Medalia

Rennack

et al . (1998) India–Pakistan Nuclear Tests and US Response. CRS Report for Congress. Available at: http://congressionalresearch.com/98-570/document.php/ (accessed 1 May 2015).

40.

Malik

(2010). India’s Nuclear Debate: Exceptionalism and the Bomb. New Delhi: Routledge.

41.

Manning

(1998) India, the Rogue Democracy. Los Angeles Times (17 May). Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/1998/may/17/opinion/op-50651 [accessed 12 April 2014].

42.

Mayo

(1927) Mother India. New York: Harcourt Brace & London: Jonathan Cape.

43.

McClintock

Mufti

Shohat

(1997) Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

44.

McMahon

(1994) The Cold War on the Periphery: The United States, India, and Pakistan (New York: Columbia University Press).

45.

Millennium Journal of International Studies (2007) Forum: Edward W. Said and International Relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies 36: 77-145.

46.

Muppidi

(1999) Postcoloniality and the production of international insecurity. In: Weldes

Laffey

Gusterson

et al . (eds) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp.119-146.

47.

Nair

(2007) Forum: Edward W. Said and international relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies 36: 77-82.

48.

National Security Strategy (2002) Bush sends new national security strategy to Congress. Department of State Washington File (20 September). Available at: http://wfile.ait.org.tw/wf-archive/2002/020920/epf502.htm/ [accessed 13 March 2014].

49.

Nayak

(2006) Orientalism and ‘Saving’ US State Identity after 9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics 8: 42-61.

50.

Nayak

Malone

(2009) American Orientalism and American Exceptionalism: A critical rethinking of US hegemony. International Studies Review 11: 253-276.

51.

Nayan

(2005). The Indo-US nuclear deal has generated a lot of heat: here’s why (4 August). Available at: http://www.idsa.in/idsastrategiccomments/TheIndoUSnucleardeal_rnayan_040805/ [accessed 4 May 2015].

52.

Ogultarhan

(2010) Iran’s nuclear program: The US misses opportunities? An examination of US policies in the Middle East and implications of those policies on the US global position. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 9(1): 112-147.

53.

Parmar

(2009) Foreign policy fusion: Liberal interventionists, conservative nationalists, and, neoconservatives –The new alliance dominating the US foreign policy establishment. International Politics 46: 177-209.

54.

Perkovich

(1999) India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact of Global Proliferation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

55.

Persaud

(2015) Colonial violence: Race and gender on the sugar plantations of British Guiana. In: Anievas

Manchanda

Shilliam

(eds) Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Color Line. New York: Routledge.

56.

Ramanna

(1992) Years of Pilgrimage. New Delhi: Penguin.

57.

Rennack

(2001) India and Pakistan: Current US economic sanctions. CRS report for Congress, 12 October, 1-6.

58.

Rice

(2006) Our opportunity With India. Washington Post (13 March). Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/12/AR2006031200978.html/ [accessed 4 May 2015].

59.

Said

(1978) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

60.

Said

(1993) Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred Knopf.

61.

Said

(1995) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

62.

Sen

(2005) India–US relations: Where are they headed? Center for the Advanced Study of India. Occasional Paper 24. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. Available at: http://www.comw.org/pda/0603india.html/ [accessed 15 March 2014].

63.

Seth

(2013) Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.

64.

Sikri

(2007) Disturbing implications of 123 Agreement (3 August). Available at: http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/aug/03guest.htm/ [accessed 4 May 2015].

65.

Singh

(1998) Against nuclear apartheid. Foreign Affairs 77: 41-52.

66.

Sinha

(2006) Specters of Mother India: The Global Restructuring of an Empire. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

67.

Snedegar

(1938) The Mother India Controversy. Durham: Duke University Press.

68.

Squassoni

(2009) US nuclear cooperation with India: Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service (29 July). Available at: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33016.pdf/ [accessed 12 September 2014].

69.

Symes

(2006) The paradox of the Cannon: Edward W. Said and musical transgression. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 27: 309-324.

70.

Talbott

(2006) ‘Profound concerns’ about US nuclear deal with India. Council on Foreign Relations (6 March). Available at: http://www.cfr.org/india/talbott-profound-concerns-us-nuclear-deal-india/p10052/ [accessed 11 May 2015].

71.

Tanter

(1998) Rogue Regimes: Terrorism and Proliferation: Prospects for the 21st Century. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

72.

Tellis

(2007) What should we expect from India as a strategic partner? In: Sokolski

(ed.) Gauging US-Indian Strategic Cooperation. Carlisle, Pennsylvania: Strategic Studies Institute.

73.

The Economic Times (2006) Nuke separation plan a surrender: BJP (6 March). Available at: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2006-03-06/news/27446195_1_separation-plan-safeguards-fissile-material/ [accessed 11 March 2014].

74.

The Hindu (2006) Appeal to parliamentarians on nuclear deal (15 August). Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/appeal-to-parliamentarians-on-nuclear-deal/article3090406.ece/ [accessed 11 March 2014].

75.

The New York Times (1998) A nuclear threat from India. The New York Times (13 May). Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/13/opinion/a-nuclear-threat-from-india.html [accessed 20 November 2014].

76.

United States Department of Defense (2003) Joint statement on US–India Defense Policy Group (8 August). Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/pr/23209.htm/ [accessed 12 April 2014].

77.

United States Department of State (2008) U.S. –India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative. US Department of State (15 October). Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/fs/2008/109567.htm/ [accessed 10 May 2015].

78.

Varadarajan

(2007) Major obstacles persist in nuclear deal (25 April). Available at: http://www.hindu.com/2007/04/25/stories/2007042512410100.htm/ [accessed 10 May 2015].

79.

van Moyland

Roger

(2013) The paper trail. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist. Available at: http://www.thebulletin.org/search/ [accessed 10 November 2014].

80.

Varnum

(2012) US nuclear cooperation as nonproliferation: Reforms, or the devil you know. NTI (27 November). Available at: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/us-nuclear-cooperation-nonproliferation-reforms-or-devil-you-know/ [accessed 10 May 2015].

81.

Weiner

(1998) The world: Naiveté at the C.I.A.; Every nation’s just another US. The New York Times (7 June). Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/07/weekinreview/the-world-naivete-at-the-cia-every-nation-s-just-another-us.html/ [accessed 18 December 2014].

82.

Weldes

Laffey

Gusterson

et al . (1999) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

83.

Zimmerman

(1998) India’s testing: Something doesn’t fit. Los Angeles Times (22 May). Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/1998/may/22/local/me-52452/ [accessed 5 November 2014].