In this article, the authors develop a discourse analytic framework for examining the antecedents, dynamics, and outcomes of interorganizational collaboration. They argue that a framework based on a discursive understanding of collaboration can provide a coherent basis for understanding the dynamics of collaboration, the relation of collaboration to its broader institutional context, and the management and facilitation of collaborative activity as a communicative process. The authors base this framework on a study of the fabric of collaborative relationships that characterize one organizational field—the Pacific Northwest whale-watching industry. The theoretical framework they have developed frames collaboration as the discursive negotiation of the issues to be addressed by the collaboration, the interests relevant to the collaboration, and the actors who should represent these legitimate interests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amara, R.
(1990). New directions for innovation. Futures, 22(2), 142-152.
2.
Astley, W. G.
(1984). Toward an appreciation of collective strategy. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 526-535.
3.
Barley, S. R.
, Freeman, J., & Hybels, R. C. (1993). Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Network and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 311-347). Boston: Harvard Business School.
4.
Barney, J.
, & Hesterley, W. (1996). Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 115-147). London: Sage.
5.
Berger, P.
, & Luckmann, T. L. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
6.
Bhaskar, R.
(1978). A realist theory of science. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
7.
Blumer, H.
(1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 19, 298-306.
8.
Bresser, R. K.
, & Harl, J. E. (1986). Collective strategy: Vice or virtue?Academy of Management Review, 11, 408-427.
9.
Browning, L. D.
, Beyer, J. M., & Shetler, J. C. (1995). Building cooperation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 113-151.
10.
Buckley, P. J.
, & Casson, M. (1988). A theory of cooperation in international business. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 31-54). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
11.
Carney, M. G.
(1987). The strategy and structure of collective action. Organization Studies, 8(4), 341-362.
12.
Clegg, S. R.
(1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
13.
Cobb, S.
(1993, July). Empowerment and mediation: A narrative perspective. Negotiation Journal, pp. 245-261.
14.
Duffus, D. A.
, & Dearden, P. (1990). Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: A conceptual framework. Biological Conservation, 53, 213-231.
15.
Emery, F. E.
, & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organisational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32.
16.
Fairclough, N.
(1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
17.
Ford, J.K.B.
, Ellis, G. M., & Balcomb, K. C. (1994). Killer whales: The natural history and genealogy in Orcinus Orca in British Columbia and Washington State. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
18.
Glaser, B. G.
, & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
19.
Granovetter, M.
(1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
20.
Gray, B.
(1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Gray, B.
, & Hay, T. M. (1986). Political limits to interorganizational consensus and change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 95-112.
22.
Hardy, C.
, Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (1998). Talking action: Conversations and narrative in interorganizational collaboration. In D. Grant et al. (Eds.), Organizational discourse: Talk, text and tropes (pp. 65-83). London: Sage.
23.
Hardy, C.
, & Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9(2), 217-230.
24.
Hardy, C.
, Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations: Forms and façades of trust. In C. Lane & R. Bachman (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 64-87). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
Harré, R.
(1979). Social being: A theory for social psychology. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Heimlich-Boran, S.
, & Heimlich-Boran, J. (1994). Killer whales. Stillwater, MN: Voyageur.
27.
Hennart, J. F.
(1991). The transaction cost theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4), 483-497.
28.
Hill, C.W.L.
(1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 500-513.
29.
Hindess, B.
(1986). ‘Interests’in political analysis. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (Sociological Review Monograph 32, pp. 112-131). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
Jepperson, R. L.
(1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Kogut, B.
(1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
33.
Kogut, B.
(1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37, 19-33.
34.
Laclau, E.
, & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
35.
Latour, B.
(1987) Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Lincoln, Y. S.
, & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
McAllister, D. J.
(1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
38.
Meyer, J. W.
, & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
39.
Meyer, J. W.
, & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Mumby, D. K.
, & Claire, R. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 181-205). London: Sage.
41.
Nathan, M. L.
, & Mitroff, I. I. (1991). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 163-180.
42.
Nohria, N.
, & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.). (1993). Network and organizations: Structure, form and action. Boston: Harvard Business School.
43.
Ouchi, W. B.
(1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.
44.
Parker, I.
(1992). Discourse dynamics. London: Routledge.
45.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
46.
Phillips, N.
, & Brown, J. (1994). Analyzing communication in and around organizations: A critical hermeneutic approach. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1547-1576.
47.
Phillips, N.
, & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4(2), 159-185.
48.
Phillips, N.
, Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (In press). Collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies.
49.
Powell, W. W.
, & Brantley, P. (1993). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks? In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Network and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 366-394). Boston: Harvard Business School.
50.
Putnam, L.
, Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Communication in organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). London: Sage.
51.
Scherer, F. M.
, & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
52.
Smith, K. G.
, Carroll, S. J., & Ashford, S. J. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 7-23.
53.
Strauss, A.
, Schatzman, L., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D., & Satshin, M. (1963). The hospital and its negotiated order. In E. Friedson (Ed.), The hospital in modern society (pp. 147-169). Chicago: Chicago Free Press.
54.
Trist, E.
(1983). Referent organizations and the development of interorganizational domains. Human Relations, 36(2), 269-284.
55.
Warren, R.
(1967). The interorganisational field as a focus for investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 396-419.
56.
Warren, R.
, Rose, S., & Bergunder, A. (1974). The structure of urban reform. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
57.
Williamson, O. E.
(1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
58.
Williamson, O. E.
(1985). The economic institution of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
59.
Williamson, O. E.
(1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 269-296.
60.
Wood, D. J.
, & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139-162.
61.
Zajac, E. J.
, & Olsen, C. (1993). From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 130-146.
