This study explores the main and interactive effects on group task performance of two types of intervention (interpersonal vs. task focused) administered at two different times (the beginning vs. the temporal midpoint of work). The results show that timing and content of intervention interact to affect group task performance. The discussion draws on qualitative data to expand on these findings and outlines conditions necessary for optimizing group performance on open-ended tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F.
, & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
2.
Gellatly, I. R.
, & Meyer, J. P. (1992). Effect of goal difficulty on physiological arousal, cognition, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 694-704.
3.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
4.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1989). Marking time: Predictable transition in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
5.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 9-45.
6.
Hackman, J. R.
, Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 350-365.
7.
Hackman, J. R.
, Edmondson, A. E., & Lee, F. (1993a). Action planning guide for getting started on your project. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
8.
Hackman, J. R.
, Edmondson, A. E., & Lee, F. (1993b). Self-administered 10,000 mile checkup for project groups. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
9.
Hackman, J. R.
, & Morris, C. G. (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 331-345). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
10.
Hays, W. L.
(1983). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
11.
Janis, I. L.
(1983). Groupthink. In J. R. Hackman, E. Lawler, & L. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives on behavior in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 378-384). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Kaplan, R. E.
(1979). The conspicuous absence of evidence that process consultation enhances task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 346-360.
13.
Kelly, J. R.
(1988). Entrainment in individual and group behavior. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Lipshitz, R.
, & Sherwood, J. J. (1978). The effectiveness of third-party consultation as a function of the consultant's prestige and style of intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 493-509.
15.
Locke, E. A.
, & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Moreland, R. L.
, & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. E. McGrath (Vol. Ed.), Sage focus editions: Vol. 91. The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Staw, B.
(1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
18.
Tuckman, B. W.
(1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
19.
Tuckman, B. W.
, & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 419-427.
20.
Williams, A. C. (1995). The effects of timing of normative intervention on task performance. Unpublished bachelor's thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
