This article examines how interests can be used to guide collaborative public decision making in an intergovernmental setting. A brief overview of the governance challenge at the local level in the United States is provided first, highlighting the unorganized nature of the domain of interlocal relations. At the local level, the need for regional solutions to public policy problems has been a major challenge for policy makers over the past decade. Jurisdictional and locality-based interests have demanded a new set of intergovernmental management skills in interlocal relations. The interest-based problem-solving process is then delineated, focusing on the application of a collaborative approach in a regional, interlocal context. Interest-based problem solving was applied in a novel way to the problem domain of interlocal relations in a setting that includes four municipalities and 13 unincorporated areas. This article concludes with a discussion of the implications of using interest-based collaborative processes in regional public decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agranoff, R.
(1985). Intergovernmental management. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Andranovich, G.
, & Lovrich, N. P. (1992). Local government then and now: The growth management challenge in the 1990s. In D. Nice, J. Pierce, & C. Sheldon (Eds.), Political life in Washington (pp. 159-179). Pullman: Washington State University Press.
3.
Baldassare, M.
(1994). Regional variations for support for regional governance. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30, 275-284.
4.
Beam, D. R.
(1993). Reinventing federalism: State-local government roles in the new economic order. In L. O'Toole, Jr. (Ed.), American intergovernmental relations (2nd ed., pp. 378-391). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5.
Bish, R. L.
, & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding urban government. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
6.
Blackburn, J. W.
(1991). Environmental mediation as an alternative to litigation. In M. K. Mills (Ed.), Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector (pp. 123-142). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
7.
Bollens, J. C.
, & Schmandt, H. J. (1975). The metropolis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Bradshaw, T. K.
(1993). Multicommunity networks: A rural transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 529, 164-175.
9.
Browne, W. P.
, & Reid, J. N. (1990). Misconceptions, institutional impediments, and the problems of rural governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 14(3), 265-284.
10.
Cigler, B. A.
(1991). Intermunicipal organizations: The untapped potential for rural Pennsylvania (Report). Center for Rural Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg.
11.
Conflict Clinic
. (1990). Designing and managing ongoing processes. Conflict Clinic training materials. Conflict Clinic, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
12.
Dodge, W. R.
(1989). The emergence of intercommunity partnerships in the 1980s. National Civic Review, 78(1), 5-14.
13.
Downs, A.
(1973). Opening up the suburbs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Fisher, R.
, & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. New York: Penguin.
15.
Forsythe, R. W.
(1993, September). Park Hills: A new union for progress. Missouri Municipal Review, pp. 6-10.
16.
Gray, B.
(1989). Collaborating. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Gray, K.
(1990, April). Learning from doing service work in local government: Achievable goals and first-and second-order change in municipal and county governments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Los Angeles.
18.
Grell, J.
, & Gappert, F. (1993). The new civic infrastructure: Intersectoral collaboration and the decision making process. National Civic Review, 82(2), 140-148.
19.
Gulick, L.
(1962). The metropolitan problem and American ideas. New York: Knopf.
20.
Hall, L.
(Ed.). (1993). Negotiation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Halter, G.
(1992, March). City-city consolidations in the United States, 1970-1988. Paper presented at the Southwest Social Science Conference, Little Rock, AR.
22.
Hamilton, M. S.
(1991). Environmental mediation: Requirements for successful institutionalization. In M. K. Mills (Ed.), Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector (pp. 164-187). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
23.
Huelsberg, N. A.
, & Lincoln, W. R (Eds.). (1985). Successful negotiating in local government. Washington, DC: International City-County Management Association.
24.
International City-County Management Association
. (1992). Regional strategies for local government management. MIS Report, 24 (March).
25.
Kartez, J.
(1990). Planning for cooperation: Local government choices (Report). Program for Local Government Education, Cooperative Extension Service, Washington State University, Pullman.
26.
Kelman, S.
(1992). Adversary and cooperationist institutions for conflict resolution in public policymaking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(2), 178-206.
27.
Kirlin, J.
(1993). Citistates and regional governance. National Civic Review, 82(4), 371-379.
28.
Lasswell, H. J.
(1958). Politics: Who gets what, when, and how. New York: Meridian.
29.
Lindblom, C.
(1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.
30.
Marando, V.
, & Florestano, P. (1990). IGM. In N. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: State of the discipline (pp. 287-317). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
31.
Mills, M. K.
(Ed.). (1991). Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
32.
National Center Associates
. (1989). The course in collaborative negotiations. Tacoma, WA: Author.
33.
Nice, D.
, & Fredericksen, P. (1995). The politics of intergovernmental relations (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
34.
Peirce, N.
(1993). Citistates. Washington, DC: Seven Locks.
35.
Protasel, G. J.
(1991). Resolving environmental conflicts: Neocorporatism, negotiated rule-making, and the timber/fish/wildlife coalition in the state of Washington. In M. K. Mills (Ed.), Alternative dispute resolution in the public sector (pp. 188-204). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
36.
Reid, J. N.
(1986). Building capacity in rural places. In B. W. Honadle & A. M. Howitt (Eds.), Perspectives on management capacity building (pp. 66-83). Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
Riposa, G.
, & Andranovich, G. (1991). Implementing economic development policy in middle America: An analysis of political, administrative, and organizational constraints. American Review of Public Administration, 21(1), 17-32.
38.
Rothenberg, I. F,
& Gordon, G. J. (1986). Out with the old, in with the new. In L. G. Bender & J. A. Stever (Eds.), Administering the new federalism (pp. 74-95). Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
Shanahan, E.
(1991). Going it jointly: Regional solutions for local problems. Governing, 5 (August), 70-76.
40.
Singer, L. R.
(1990). Settling disputes. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
Straus, D.
(1993). Facilitated collaborative problem solving and process management. In L. Hall (Ed.), Negotiation (pp. 28-40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Susskind, L.
, & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Wall, M.
, & Luther, V. (1992). Six myths about the future of small towns. Lincoln, NE: Heartland Center for Leadership Development.
44.
Wallis, A.
(1994a). Inventing regionalism: The first two waves. National Civic Review, 83(2), 159-175.
45.
Wallis, A.
(1994b). Evolving structures and challenges of metropolitan regions. National Civic Review, 83(1), 40-53.
46.
Wood, D. J.
, & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
47.
Wright, D. S.
(1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
48.
Wright, D. S.
(1990). Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 168-178.
49.
Yin, R. K.
, & Andranovich, G. (1987). Getting research used in the natural hazards field: The role of professional associations. Washington, DC: COSMOS Corporation.
