The sociotechnical systems (STS) approach is devoted to the effective blending of both the technical and social systems of an organization. These two aspects must be considered interdependently, because arrangements that are optimal for one may not be optimal for the other and trade-offs are often required. Thus, for effective organization design, there is need for both dual focus and joint optimization. This article traces the development of STS from the presentation of its first principles by Eric Trist, its leading founder, who was guided by earlier systems thinking, research on participation, and the action research work of Kurt Lewin, to the present, including discussion of adaptations and refinements that have enhanced its applicability to nonmanufacturing organizations. The approach has more relevance today than ever before, as organizational personnel seek more fruitful means of empowerment and as their organizations strive for greater productivity and viability in increasingly turbulent environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D. G.
(1989, August 13-16). Top management teams: Preparing for the revolution. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
2.
Bertalanffy, L.
(1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 3, 23-29.
3.
Campion, M. A.
, & Thayer, P. W. (1985). Development and field evaluation of an interdisciplinary measure of job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 29-43.
4.
Cohen, S. G.
, & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47, 13-43.
5.
Cummings, T. G.
, & Huse, E. F. (1989). Organizational development and change. New York: West.
6.
Emery, F. E.
(1959). Characteristics of socio-technical systems (Document No. 527). London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
7.
Emery, F. E.
(1967). The next thirty years: Concepts, methods and anticipations. Human Relations, 20, 199-237.
8.
Emery, F. E.
(1987, June 15-19). Paper No. 24. Paper presented at Einar Thorsrud memorial symposium and workshop: Strategies for work and learning-1999. Work Research Institute, Oslo, Norway.
9.
Engelstad, P. H.
(1990, August 12-15). The evolution of network strategies in action research supported socio-technical redesign programs in Scandinavia. Symposium presentation at Academy of Management meetings, San Francisco.
10.
Hackman, J. R.
, & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Herbst, P. G.
(1954). The analyses of social flow systems. Human Relations, 7, 327-336.
12.
Herbst. P. G.
(1974). Socio-technical design. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
13.
Manz, C. C.
, & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
14.
Morley, D.
, & Trist, E. (1981). Children: Our number one resource, a report on the Saskatchewan search conference on day care. Unpublished manuscript, York University, Faculty of Environmental Studies, Toronto.
15.
Nelson, R. E.
, & Mathews, K. M. (1991). Cause maps and social network analysis in organizational diagnosis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 379-397.
16.
O'Reilly, C. A.
, & Flatt, S. (1989, August 13-16). Executive team demography, organizational innovation, and firm performance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
17.
Pava, C.
(1986). Redesigning sociotechnical systems design: Concepts and methods for the 1990s. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 201-221.
18.
Rice, A. K.
(1958). Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad experiment. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
19.
Rice, A. K.
, & Trist, E. L. (1952). Institutional and sub-institutional determinants of change in labour turnover. Human Relations, 5, 347-372.
20.
Sitter, L. U. de
, & Hertog, J. F. de. (1990, August 12-15). Simple organizations, complex jobs: The Dutch sociotechnical approach. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.
21.
Taylor, J. C.
(1986). Long-term sociotechnical systems change in a computer operations department. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 303-313.
22.
Taylor, J. C.
(1990, August 12-15). Two decades of socio-technical systems in North America. Symposium paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.
23.
Taylor, J. C.
, Gustavson, P., & Carter, W. (1986). Integrating the social and technical systems of organizations. In D. D. Davis and Associates (Eds.), Managing technological innovation (pp. 154-186). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Teram, E.
(1991). Interdisciplinary teams and the control of clients: A sociotechnical perspective. Human Relations, 44, 343-356.
25.
Trist, E. L.
(1971). Critique of scientific management in terms of socio-technical theory. Prakseologia, 39-40, 159-174.
26.
Trist, E. L.
(1981). The evolution of soci-technical systems: A conceptual framework and action research program (Occasional paper No. 2). Ontario, Canada: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
27.
Trist, E. L.
, & Bamforth, K. (1951). Social and psychological consequences of longwall coal mining. Human Relations, 4, 3-38.
28.
Tushman, M. L.
, Virany, B., & Romanelli, E. (1989, August 13-16). Effects of CEO and executive team succession on subsequent organization performance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
29.
van Eijnatten, F. M.
, Hoevenaars, A. M., & Rutte, C. G. (1992). Holistic and participative (re)design: Contemporary STSD modeling in the Netherlands. In Dian M. Hosking & N. Anderson (Eds.), Organizational change and innovation: Psychological perspectives and practices in Europe (pp. 183-207). London: Routledge.
30.
Weisbord, M. R.
(1987). Productive workplaces: Organizing for dignity, meaning, and community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Wilson, A. T.
(1957). General management and the personnel function: Research report to Unilever, Ltd.London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
32.
Winterton, J.
(1994). Social and technological characteristics of coal face work: A temporal and spatial analysis. Human Relations, 47, 89-118.
