Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In a controlled laboratory experiment, the effects of a team-development intervention based on the theory of appreciative inquiry were compared with task-oriented team development (TOTD) and lectures on group processes, outcomes, and performance. Undergraduate students (96) in two semesters of an introductory organization behavior course participated in four-person teams and had 13 weeks to complete a task worth 25% of each member's final grade. One third of the teams received an appreciative inquiry intervention, another third received a TOTD intervention, and the final third received a lecture on group dynamics (placebo). Pre-and postsurveys assessed group process and outcomes; project grades were used to assess task performance. ANOVAs and ANCOVAs on each of the process and outcome measures showed groups receiving appreciative inquiry, and TOTD scored significantly higher than those receiving the placebo on almost all measures, including task performance. Teams receiving TOTD scored significantly higher than appreciative inquiry on task performance. Implications for organization development and directions for future research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barker, J. , Tjosvold, D. , & Andrews, I. R. (1988). Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 167-177.

Bennis, W. G. , & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-437.

Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

Bushe, G. R. , & Pitman, T. (1991). Appreciative process: A method for transformational change. OD Practitioner, 23(3), 1-4.

Chin, R. , & Benne, K. D. (1985). General strategies for effecting change in human systems. In W. G. Bennis , K. D. Benne , & R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (pp. 22-45). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Cooperrider, D. L. (1990). Positive image, positive action: The affirmative basis of organizing. In S. Srivastva & D. L. Cooperrider (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership (pp. 91-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cooperrider, D. L. , & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129-169.

Curran, M. (1991). Appreciative inquiry: A third wave approach to OD. Vision/Action, 10(4), 9-11.

Elden, M. , & Chisholm, F, (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46, 121-142.

10.

Gergen, K. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.

11.

Gergen, K. (1990). Affect and organization in postmodern society. In S. Srivastva & D. L. Cooperrider (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership (pp. 153-174). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.

13.

Hirschhorn, L. (1988). The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Israel, B. A. , Schurman, S. J. , & Hugentobler, M. K. (1992). Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 28, 74-101.

15.

Jaques, E. (1955). Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein , P. Heimann , & R. E. Money-Kryle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis (pp. 478-498). New York: Basic Books.

16.

Kernaghan, J. A. , & Cooke, R. A. (1990). Teamwork in planning innovative projects: Improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 87, 109-116.

17.

Kolb, D. A. , & Frohman, A. L. (1970). An organization development approach to consulting. Sloan Management Review, 12, 51-65.

18.

Moretti, M. M. , & Higgins, E. T. (1990). Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 108-123.

19.

Porras, J. I. , & Robertson, P. J. (1987). Organization development theory: A typology and evaluation. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 1-58.

20.

Quinn, R. E. , & Cameron, K. S. (Eds.). (1988). Paradox and transformation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

21.

Rubin, I. M. , Plovnick, M. S. , & Fry, R. E. (1977). Task oriented team development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

22.

Schutz, A. (1971). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague, Netherlands: Matinus Nijhoff.

23.

Seashore, S. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

24.

Social Innovations in Global Management . (1989, November). [Conference.] Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

25.

Srivastva, S. , Obert, S. L. , & Neilsen, E. H. (1977). Organizational analysis through group processes: A theoretical perspective for organization development. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Organizational development in the U.K. and the U.S.A. (pp. 83-111). New York: Macmillan.

26.

Sundstrom, E. , de Meuse, K. P. , & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.

27.

Sussman, G. I. , & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-603.

28.

Watzlawick, P. , Weakland, J. , & Fisch, R. (1974). Change. New York: Norton.

29.

Whitman, R. M. (1964). Psychodynamic principles underlying T-group development. In L. P. Bradford , J. R. Gibb , & K. D. Benne (Eds.), T-group theory and laboratory method (pp. 310-335). New York: Wiley.

Appreciative Inquiry as a Team-Development Intervention: A Controlled Experiment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References