Research on group interaction styles and problem-solving effectiveness suggests that group behavior can be analyzed in terms of three general styles: constructive, passive, and aggressive. Empirical studies, however, have tended to focus on only one or two of these styles in examining their relation to measures of problem-solving effectiveness. Using data based on 61 groups that participated in a simulated survival exercise, the research reported in this article compares the effects of all three styles on criteria of effectiveness (e.g., solution quality and acceptance). Consistent with the hypotheses, constructive styles are found to be positively related, and passive styles negatively related, to the effectiveness criteria. Aggressive styles are shown to be generally unrelated to solution quality but negatively related to solution acceptance. The results suggest that future empirical research as well as early team development interventions should consider the unique effects of different group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F.
(1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bales, R. F.
(1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3.
Burleson, B. R.
, Levine, B. J., & Samter, W. (1984). Decision-making procedure and decision quality. Human Communication Research, 10, 557-574.
4.
Carter, L. F.
(1954). Evaluating the performance of individuals as members of small groups. Personnel Psychology, 7, 477-484.
5.
Cooke, R. A.
, & Kernaghan, J. A. (1987). Estimating the differences between group versus individual performance on problem-solving tasks. Group and Organization Studies, 12, 319-342.
6.
Cooke, R. A.
, & Lafferty, J. C. (1988). Group Styles Inventory. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
7.
Cosier, R. A.
, & Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 69-74.
8.
Couch, A. S. (1960). Psychological determinants of interpersonal behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
9.
Couch, A. S.
, & Carter, L. F. (1952, March). A factorial study of the rated behavior of group members. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City, NJ.
10.
Darlington, R. B.
(1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
de Bono, E.
(1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row.
12.
Drucker, P. F.
(1967). The effective executive. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
Feldman, D. C.
(1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
14.
Festinger, L.
(1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
15.
Fouriezos, N. T.
, Hutt, M. L., & Guetzkow, H. (1950). Measurement of self-oriented needs in discussion groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 682-690.
16.
George, J. M.
(1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
17.
Gersick, C.J.G.
(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
18.
Hackman, J. R.
, & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45-99.
19.
Hare, A. P.
(1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
20.
Harvey, J. B.
(1974). The Abilene Paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, 3, 63-80.
21.
Hirokawa, R. Y.
(1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 134-141.
22.
Hirokawa, R. Y.
(1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
23.
Hirokawa, R. Y.
(1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
24.
Hoffman, L. R.
(1961). Conditions for creative problem solving. Journal of Psychology, 52, 429-444.
25.
Hoffman, L. R.
(1965). Group problem solving. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 99-132.
26.
Hoffman, L. R.
(1979). Applying experimental research on group problem solving to organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 375-391.
27.
Hoffman, L. R.
, Harburg, E., & Maier, N.R.F. (1962). Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 206-214.
28.
James, L. R.
, Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
29.
James, L. R.
, Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-378.
30.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
Kernaghan, J. A.
, & Cooke, R. A. (1987). The relationship of group process factors to the quality and acceptance of group output. International Journal of Small Group Research, 3, 39-60.
32.
Kilmann, R. H.
(1989). Managing beyond the quick fix: A completely integrated program for creating and maintaining organizational success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Kozlowski, S.W.J.
, & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161-167.
34.
Lafferty, J. C.
(1974). The subarctic survival situation. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
35.
Leary, T.
(1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.
36.
Maier, N.R.F.
(1963). Problem-solving discussions and conferences: Leadership methods and skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Maier, N.R.F.
(1967). Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: The need for an integrative function. Psychological Review, 74, 239-249.
38.
Maier, N.R.F.
, & Hoffman, L. R. (1964). Financial incentives and group decision in motivating change. Journal of Social Psychology, 64, 369-378.
39.
McGrath, J. E.
(1965). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
40.
McGrath, J. E.
(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41.
Nemeth, C. J.
(1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 95-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Othmer, E.
, & Othmer, S. C. (1989). The clinical interview: Using DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
43.
Schein, E. H.
(1988). Process consultation: Volume l. Its role in organization development (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44.
Seeger, J. A.
(1983). No innate phases in group problem solving. Academy of Management Review, 8, 683-689.
45.
Shaw, M. E.
(1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Smith, K. A.
, Peterson, R. P., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1986). The effects of controversy and concurrence seeking on effective decision making. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 237-248.
47.
Staw, B. M.
(1975). Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414-432.
48.
Steiner, I. D.
(1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
49.
Stephenson, B. Y.
, Michaelsen, L. K., & Franklin, S. G. (1982). An empirical test of the nominal group technique in state solar energy planning. Group and Organization Studies, 7, 320-334.
50.
Stock, D.
, & Thelen, H. A. (1958). Emotional dynamics and group culture: Experimental studies of individual and group behavior. New York: New York University Press.
51.
Watson, W. E.
, & Michaelsen, L. K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 495-516.
52.
Wells, L., Jr.
(1992). Feedback, the group unconscious, and the unstated effects of experimental methods. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 46-53.
