Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Relying on secondary analysis of three surveys, this study examines the prevalence of self-help group (SHG) use. Two of the surveys are based on large household probability samples (Epidemiological Catchment Area and Mellinger-Balter surveys) and the third on the population of self-help groups in California. Based on the best available survey information, an estimated 7.5 million adults participated in a SHG during 1992. Self-help group use for mental health problems appears to be a predominately White, middle-class phenomenon. Use of services is overlapping; those who seek out help do so in multiple service delivery modalities. Highlighted in this article are the problems of accurately assessing SHG participation based on current survey information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antze, P. (1976). The role of ideologies in peer psychotherapy organizations: Some theoretical considerations and three case studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 323-346.

Cowen, C. L. , Gardner, F. A. , & Zax, M. (Eds.). (1967). Emergent approaches to mental health problems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Gottlieb, B. , & Peters, L. (1991). A national portrait of mutual aid group participants in Canada. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 651-666.

Levy, L. H. (1976). Self-help groups, types and psychological processes. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 310-322.

Levy, L. H. (1984). Issues in research and evaluation. In R. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.), The self help revolution (pp. 155-172). New York: Human Science Press.

Lieberman, M. A. (1989). Mutual aid groups: An underutilized resource among the elderly. In Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (Vol. 9, pp. 285-320). New York: Springer.

Lieberman, M. A. (1992). Bereavement self-help groups: Areview of conceptual and methodological issues. In M. S. Strobe & R. O. Hanson (Eds.), Bereavement: A sourcebook of research and intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lieberman, M. A. , & Borman, L. (1979). Self-help groups for coping with crises: Origins, members, processes and impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lieberman, M. A. , & Videka-Sherman, L. (1986). The impact of self-help groups on the mental health of widows and widowers. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 435-449.

10.

Mellinger, G. , & Balter, M. (1983). Collaborative project: GMIRSB report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.

11.

Narrow, W. E. , Regier, D. A. , Rae, P. S. , Manderscheid, R. W. , & Locke, B. Z. (1993). Use of services by persons with mental and addictive disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 95-107.

12.

Robins, L. N. , & Regier, D. A. (1991). Psychiatric disorders in America. New York: Free Press.

13.

Room, R. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous as a social movement. In B. S. McCrady & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Research on Alcoholics Anonymous. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.

14.

Room, R. , & Greenfield, T. (1991). Alcoholics Anonymous, other 12 step movements and psychotherapy in the U.S. population, 1990 (Working Paper No. F281). Berkeley, CA: Alcohol Research Group, Medical Research Institute of San Francisco.

15.

Tracy, G. , & Gussow, Z. (1976). Self-help groups: A grass-root response to a need for services. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 12, 381-396.

Problems in Assessing Prevalence and Membership Characteristics of Self-Help Group Participants

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References