As critical group representatives in public school districts (K-12), superintendents and teacher union presidents have a direct impact on the success of education reform programs. Aspects of the superintendent-union president interface were explored by focusing on one ingredient of effective work relations, namely, interpersonal trust. Regression analyses of survey data from 305 superintendents and 293 presidents investigated potential differences across the two samples concerning variables influencing respondents ` willingness to trust the other group representative. For both samples, willingness to trust was influenced primarily by expectations about the other group representative's future trustworthy behavior Social judgment factors were important predictors of expectations for both superintendents and presidents. For presidents, personality failed to influence expectations. Perceptions of normative referent groups suggested that superintendents and presidents operate under conflicting intergroup pressures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. S.
(1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1175-1199). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Ajzen, I.
, & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Alderfer, C. P.
(1977). Group and intergroup relations. In J. R. Hackman & J. L. Shuttle (Eds.), Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change (pp. 227-296). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
4.
Alderfer, C. P.
(1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 190-222). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Bacharach, S. B.
(Ed.). (1990). Education reform: Making sense of it all. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Barber, B.
(1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
Barnes, L. B.
(1981). Managing the paradox of organizational trust. Harvard Business Review, 59, 107-116.
8.
Blake, R. R.
, & Mouton, J. S. (1984). Solving costly organizational conflicts: Achieving intergroup trust, cooperation, and teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Brown, L. D.
(1983). Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy
. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Author.
11.
Chun, K.
, & Campbell, J. (1974). Dimensionality of the Rotter interpersonal trust scale. Psychological Reports, 35, 1059-1070.
12.
Currall, S. C. (1990). T1e role of interpersonal trust in work relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
13.
Currall, S. C.
, & Judge, T. A. (1992). Exploring the trust gap: Dimensions and predictors of trust among labor and management representatives (Working Paper No. 92-09). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
14.
Darlington, R. B.
(1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Deutsch, M.
(1958). Trust and suspicion. Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
16.
Driscoll, J.
(1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 44-56.
17.
Fishbein, M.
(1980). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. In H. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 27, pp. 65-116). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18.
Giffin, K.
(1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 104-120.
19.
Golembiewski, R. T.
, & McConkie, M. (1975). The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 131-185). London: Wiley.
20.
Hammer, T. H.
, Currall, S. C., & Stern, R. N. (1991). Labor representation on corporate boards of directors: A competing roles model. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44, 661-680.
21.
Ilgen, D. R.
, Nebeker, D. M., & Pritchard, R. D. (1981). Expectancy theory measures: An empirical comparison in an experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and human Performance, 28, 189-223.
22.
Kerchner, C. T.
, & Mitchell. D. E. (1988). The changing idea of a teachers' union. New York: Falmer.
23.
Kochan, T.
, Katz, H., & McKersie, R. (1986). The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Lawrence, P. R.
, & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
25.
Montgomery, D. C.
, & Peck, E. A. (1982). introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
26.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27.
O'Reilly, C.
, & Roberts, K. (1976). Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 99-102.
28.
Rice, A. K.
(1969). Individual, group, and intergroup processes. Human Relations, 22, 565-584.
29.
Rodman, B.
(1987, September 30). Friendship and trust: Unusual keys to radical pact. Education Week, pp. 20-21.
30.
Rosow, J.
, & Zager, R. (1989). Allies in educational reform: How teachers, unions, and administrators can join forces for better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Rotter, J. B.
(1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
32.
Rotter, J. B.
(1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1-7.
33.
Sheppard, B. H.
, Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.
34.
Smith, K. K.
(1982). Groups in conflict: Prisons in disguise. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
35.
Walton, R.
, & McKersie, R. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Wall, J.
(1975). The effects of constituent trust and representative bargaining visibility on intergroup bargaining. Organizational Behaivior and Human Performance, 14, 244-256.
37.
Zand, D.
(1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239.
