This article presents the major theoretical issues concerning "role taking" and "role making," particularly as these relate to relationships between majority and minority groups. The author examines the barriers researchers and others face when seeking to take the roles of others, and finds that we must recognize how ethnic and/or gender differences affect role taking. Three problem areas are examined: circumstances in which one group has more power than another, unexamined roles, and contradictory role expectations. The author concludes that role taking and role making have major methodological implications, and that further analysis of these concepts is essential to our understanding of the relationships among persons from different sectors of society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E.
, & Gonzalez, A. (1988). Desegregation, jigsaw, and the Mexican American experience. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 301-314). New York: Plenum.
2.
Baca Zinn, M.
(1982). Chicano men and masculinity. The Journal of Ethnic Studies, 10, 29-44.
3.
Becker, H.
(1963). Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
4.
Biddle, B. J.
(1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
5.
Billig, M.
, Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middletown, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. Newbury Park: Sage.
6.
Blumer, H.
(1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Brewer, R. M.
(1989). Black women and feminist sociology: The emerging perspective. The American Sociologist, 20, 57-70.
8.
Collins, P. H.
(1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33, S14-S32.
9.
Collins, R.
(1989). Toward a neo-Meadian sociology of mind. Symbolic Interaction, 12, 1-32.
10.
Cook, J. A.
, & Fonow, M. M. (1986). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 2-29.
11.
Cooley, C. H.
(1956). The two major works of Charles H. Cooley: Social organization: Human nature and the social order. New York: Free Press.
12.
De Leon, A.
(1983). They called them Greasers. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13.
Denzin, N.
(1989). The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Embree, J. F.
(1939). Suye Mura: A Japanese village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E.
(1940). The Nuer. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Fischer, M. M. J.
(1986). Ethnicity and the postmodern arts of memory. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 194-233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Fox-Genovese, E.
(1988). Within the plantation household: Black and white women of the Old South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
18.
Goffman, E.
(1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
19.
Goode, W. J.
(1986). Why men resist. In A. S. Skolnick & J. H. Skolnick (Eds.), Family in transition (pp. 145-161). Boston: Little, Brown.
20.
Gouldner, A.
(1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Horowitz, R.
(1983). Honor and the American dream. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
Katz, P. A.
, & Taylor, D. A. (1988). Introduction. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 1-16). New York: Plenum.
23.
Killian, L. A.
(1970). Herbert Blumer's contributions to race relations. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior (pp. 179-190). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
Komarovsky, M.
(1946). Cultural contradictions and sex roles. American Journal of Sociology, 52, 184-189.
25.
Komarovsky, M.
(1988). The new feminist scholar-ship: Some precursors and polemics. Journal of Marriage and the Family50, 585-593.
26.
Lengerrnann, P. M.
, & Niebrugge-Brantley, J. (1988). Contemporary feminist theory. In G. Ritzer, Contemporary sociological theory (2nd ed.) (pp. 292-325). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
27.
Lindzey, G.
, & Aronson, E. (Eds.). (1985). Hand-book of social psychology (2 vols.) (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
28.
Lofland, J.
, & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
29.
Madsen, W.
(1964). The Mexican-Americans of South Texas. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
30.
Mead, G. H.
(1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Merton, R. K.
(1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 9-47.
32.
McCall, G.
, & Simmons, J. L. (1982). Social psychology: A sociological approach. New York: Free Press.
33.
Mirandé, A.
(1985). The Chicano experience: An alternative perspective. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
34.
Moore, J.
(1976). Mexican Americans. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
Moore, J.
, & Devitt, M. (1989). The paradox of deviance in addicted Mexican American mothers. Gender & Society, 3, 53-70.
36.
Paredes, A.
(1977). On ethnographic work among minority groups. New Scholar, 6, 1-32.
37.
Rollins, J.
(1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38.
Rosaldo, R.
(1986). From the door of his tent: The fieldworker and the inquisitor. In J. Clifford & E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 77-97). Berkeley: University of California Press.
39.
Rosenberg, M.
, & Turner, R. H. (Eds.). (1981). Social psychology. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Rubel, A.
(1966). Across the tracks: Mexican-Americans in a Texas city. Austin: University of Texas Press.
41.
Schutz, A.
(1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
42.
Sjoberg, G.
, & Nett, R. (1968). A methodology for social research. New York: Harper & Row.
43.
Smith, C. W.
(1982). On the sociology of mind. In P. Secord (Ed.), Explaining social behavior (pp. 211-228). Beverly Hills: Sage.
44.
Smith, R. J.
, & Wiswell, E. L. (1982). The women of Suye Mura. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Stanfield, J.
(1985). Philanthropy and Jim Crow in American social science. Westport, CT: Green-wood Press.
46.
Turner, R. H.
(1956). Role-taking, role standpoint, and reference-group behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 316-328.
47.
Turner, R. H.
(1962). Role taking: Process versus conformity. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20-39). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
48.
Turner, R. H.
(1985). Unanswered questions in the convergence between structuralist and interactionist role theories. In H. J. Helle & S. N. Eisenstadt (Eds.), Micro-sociological theory perspectives on sociological theory (Vol. 2) (pp. 22-36). Beverly Hills: Sage.
49.
Vaughan, T. R.
, & Sjoberg, G. (1984). The individual and bureaucracy: An alternative Meadian interpretation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 57-69.
50.
Warner, O.
, & Schoepfle, G. M. (1987). Systematic fieldwork foundations of ethnography and interviewing (Vol. 1). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Weiner, A.
(1976). Women of value, men of renown. Austin: University of Texas Press.
52.
Williams, N.
(1989). Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of role making. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction: A research annual. (Vol. 10). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
53.
Williams, N.
(In press). The Mexican American family: Tradition and change. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
54.
Wilson, W. J.
(1974). The new black sociology: Reflections on the "insiders and outsiders" controversy. In J. E. Blackwell & J. Janowitz (Eds.), Black sociologists: Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 322-338). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
Wilson, W. J.
(1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
