Developing Cooperative Labor-Management Relations in Unionized Factories: A Multiple Case Study of Quality Circles and Parallel Organizations within Joint Quality of Work Life Projects
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 1988
Developing Cooperative Labor-Management Relations in Unionized Factories: A Multiple Case Study of Quality Circles and Parallel Organizations within Joint Quality of Work Life Projects
A study compared the attempts of five different manufacturing plants of a corporation to develop more cooperative labor-management relations, examining results obtained for the first two years of the change projects. Data were collected through interviews with senior and lower-level managers, supervisors, and union officials, and from records on productivity, product quality, and grievances. Based on the numbers of problem-solving groups and reported changes affecting managers and union officials, two plants succeeded in improving labor-management relations, but through processes contrary to prescriptions given in the current literature. The author presents many deficiencies in current conceptualizations related to union-management change efforts. The article suggests topics for future research, especially the utility of an intergroup relations perspective and parallel organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C. P.
(1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 190-222). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Alderfer, C. P.
, & Lewicki, R. J. (1973). The tensions between research and intervention in intergroup conflict. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9(4), 424-449.
3.
Bocialetti, G.
(1987). Quality of work life: Some unintended effects on the seniority tradition of an industrial union. Group and Organization Studies, 12(4), 386-410.
4.
Brett, J. M.
(1980). Behavioral research on unions and union management systems. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 177-213). Greenwich, Ca: JAI Press.
5.
Bushe, G. R.
(1984). Quality circles in quality of work life projects: Problems and prospects for increasing employee participation. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 3(2), 101-113.
6.
Bushe, G. R.
, Danko, D. P., & Long, K. J. (1984). A structure for successful worker problem solving groups. In D. Cleland (Ed.), Matrix management systems handbook (pp. 714-731). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7.
Coch, L.
, & French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512-532.
8.
Ferris, G. R.
, & Wagner, J. A. (1985). Quality circles in the United States: A conceptual reevaluation., Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(2), 155-167.
9.
Fox, A.
(1974). Beyond contract. London: Faber & Faber.
10.
Gamson, W. A.
(1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
11.
Gibson, P.
(1982a). Quality circles: An approach to productivity improvement. New York: Pergamon.
12.
Gibson, P.
(1982b, May). Assess readiness, measure change and survive!The Quality Circles Journal, 5, 19-31.
13.
Goldstein, S. G.
(1978). A structure for change. Human Relations, 31(10), 957-983.
14.
Goldstein, S. G.
(1985). Organizational dualism and quality circles. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 504-517.
15.
Goodman, P. S.
(1979). Assessing organizational change. New York: Wiley.
16.
Gryna, F. M.
(1981). Quality circles: A team approach to problem-solving. New York: AMACOM.
17.
Herrick, N. Q.
(1985). Parallel organizations in unionized settings: Implications for research. Human Relations, 38(10), 963-981.
Jaques, E.
(1952). The changing culture of a factory. New York: Dryden.
20.
Kanter, R. M.
(1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
21.
Katz, H. C.
, Kochan, T. A., & Gobeille, K. R. (1983). Industrial relations performance, economic performance, and QWL programs: An interplant analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37(1), 3-17.
22.
Kochan, T. A.
(1980). Collective bargaining and organizational behavior research. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 129-176). Greenwich, Ca: JAI Press.
23.
Kochan, T. A.
, & Dyer, L. (1976). A model of organizational change in the context of union-management relations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12(1), 59-78.
24.
Kochan, T. A.
, Dyer, L., & Lipsky, D. B. (1977). The effectiveness of union-management safety committees. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute.
25.
Lawler, E. E.
, & Drexler, J. A. (1978, March). Dynamics of establishing cooperative quality-of-worklife projects. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 23-28.
26.
Lawler, E. E.
, & Mohrman, S. A. (1985, January-February). Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review, pp. 65-71.
27.
Macy, B. A.
(1982). The Bolivar quality of work life program: Success or failure? In R. Zager & M. P. Rosow (Eds.), The innovative organization (pp. 184-221). New York: Pergamon.
28.
Marks, M. L.
, Mirvis, P. H., Hackett, E. J., & Grady, J. F. (1986). Employee participation in a quality circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity and absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 61-69.
29.
Miller, E. C.
(1978, September-October). The parallel organization structure at General Motors: An interview with Howard C. Carlson. Personnel, pp. 64-69.
30.
Mintzberg, H.
(1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Nadler, D. A.
, Hanlon, M., & Lawler E. E. (1980). Factors influencing the success of labor-management quality of work-life projects. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1(1), 53-67.
32.
Novelli, L.
, & Mohrman, S. A. (1982). A little bit of participation can be a dangerous thing. Paper presented at meeting of the Western Academy of Management.
33.
Oshry, B.
(1977). Power and position. Boston: Power & Systems.
34.
Quinn, J. B.
(1980). Strategies for Change. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
35.
Rafaeli, A.
(1985). Quality circles and employee attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 38, 603-615.
36.
Rice, A. K.
(1969). Individual, group and intergroup processes. Human Relations, 22, 565-584.
37.
Rubenstein, D.
, & Woodman, R. W. (1984). Spiderman and the Burma Raiders: Collateral organization theory in action. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(1), 1-21.
38.
Schuster, M.
(1983). The impact of union-management cooperation on productivity and employment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36(3), 415-430.
39.
Schuster, M.
(1984). Cooperation and change in union settings: Problems and opportunities. Human Resource Management, 23(2), 145-160.
40.
Schuster, M.
(1985). Models of cooperation and change in union settings. Industrial Relations, 24(3), 382-394.
41.
Sherif, M.
(1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(3), 349-356.
42.
Shirom, A.
(1983). Toward a theory of organization development interventions in unionized work settings. Human Relations, 36(8), 743-764.
43.
Smith, K. K.
(1982). Groups in conflict. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
44.
Stein, B. A.
, & Kanter, R. M. (1980). Building the parallel organization: Creating mechanisms for permanent quality of work life. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16(3), 371-388.
45.
Walton, R. E.
(1975). Criteria for quality of working life. In L. E. Davis & A. B. Cherns (Eds.), The quality of working life (Vol. 1, pp. 91-104). New York: Free Press.
46.
Walton, R. E.
, & Schlesinger, L. A. (1979, Winter). Do supervisors thrive in participative work systems?Organizational Dynamics, pp. 25-38.
47.
Zand, D.
(1974). Collateral organization: A new change strategy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 63-90.
