To address the shortage of instruments related to employee assistance programs (EAPs), the Behavioral Index of Troubled Employees (BITE) was developed. This focuses on one aspect of the supervisor-troubled worker intervention process: supervisors' attitudes toward behaviors of impaired employees. As such, the BITE gathers information on supervisors' opinions of various behaviors associated with troubled workers. In a study of the instrument, the BITE was administered to 237 supervisors from two companies in the automotive industry. The underlying structure and pattern of the supervisors' attitudes was determined through the use of principle components factor analytic and reliability procedures. The results suggest that the BITE comprises four valid, reliable factors: industriousness, resistance, acrimoniousness, and disaffection. The authors discuss the implications of using the BITE in future research, theory testing, and training supervisors about EAP practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BayerG. (1987). An investigation of the construct validity of the Behavioral Index of Troubled Employees (BITE). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
2.
BayerG.GersteinL. (1988). An adaptation of models of prosocial behavior to supervisor interventions with troubled employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 23–27.
3.
BeyerJ.TriceH. (1984). The best-worst technique for measuring work performance in organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Statistics, 1, 95–115.
4.
BurgrabeJ.SwiftJ. (1984a, July/August). Evaluating your EAP: A practical approach. EAP Digest, pp. 26–29.
5.
BurgrabeJ.SwiftJ. (1984b, September/October). Evaluating your EAP: A practical approach. EAP Digest, pp. 38–41.
6.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
7.
DickmanF.EmenerW. (1982). Employee assistance programs: Basic concepts, attributes and an evaluation. Personnel Administrator, 27, 55–62.
8.
DowellB.WexleyK. (1978). Development of a work behavior taxonomy for first-line supervisors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 563–572.
9.
DunkinW. (1982). A brief history of employee alcoholism/assistance programs. Labor-Management Alcoholism Journal, 11, 165–168.
10.
GersteinL. (1988). The bystander-equity model of supervisory helping behavior: Future research on the prevention of employee problems. Paper presented at the NIAAA Research Conference on Alcohol and the Workplace: Integrating Perspectives on Prevention and Intervention, Jekyll Island, GA.
11.
GersteinL.BayerG. (1987, May). A factor analytic study of the Behavioral Index of Troubled Employees (BITE). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
12.
GersteinL.BayerG. (1988a). Employee assistance programs: A systemic investigation of their use. Journal of Counseling & Development, 66, 294–297.
13.
GersteinL.BayerG. (1988b). The future of employee assistance programs: An interdisciplinary perspective. A symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.
14.
GoldfriedM.D'ZurrilaT. J. (1969). A behavior-analytic model for assessing competence. In SpeilbergerC. D. (ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.
15.
GooginsB.KurtzN. (1980). Factors inhibiting supervisor referrals to occupational alcoholism intervention programs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 41, 1196–1208.
16.
GooginsB.KurtzN. (1981). Discriminating participating and nonparticipating supervisors in occupational alcoholism programs. Journal of Drug Issues, 11, 199–216.
17.
GuilfordJ. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
HoffmanE.RomanP. (1984). Effects of supervisory style and experientially based frames of reference on organizational alcoholism programs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 45, 260–267.
19.
KerlingerF. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20.
KurtzN.GooginsB.HowardW. (1984). Measuring the success of occupational alcoholism programs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 45, 33–45.
21.
LikertR. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives in Psychology, 140, 1–55.
22.
MasiD. (1984). Developing employee assistance programs. New York: American Management Association.
23.
MaxwellM. (1960). Early identification of problem drinkers in industry. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 21, 655–678.
24.
PatchenM. (1965). Some questionnaire measures of employee motivation and morale: A report of their reliability and validity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
RomanP. (1980). Employee alcoholism and employee assistance programs: Similarities and differences in major corporations in 1979. Labor-Management Alcoholism Journal, 9, 211–222.
26.
SchrammC.MandellW.ArcherJ. (1978). Workers who drink: Their treatment in an industrial setting. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
27.
TriceH. (1957). Identifying the problem drinker on the job. Personnel, 34, 527–533.
28.
TriceH. (1964). New light on identifying the alcoholic employee. Personnel, 41, 18–25.
29.
TriceH. (1980). Applied research studies: Job based alcoholism and employee assistance programs. Alcohol Health and Research World, 4, 4–16.
30.
TriceH.BeyerJ. (1982). Social control in work settings: Using the constructive confrontation strategy with problem-drinking employees. Journal of Drug Issues, 12, 21–49.
31.
TriceH.BeyerJ. (1984). Work-related outcomes of the constructive-confrontation strategy in a job-based alcoholism program. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 45, 393–404.
32.
TriceH.RomanP. (1972). Spirits and demons at work: Alcohol and other drugs on the job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Health Resources and Services Administraton, Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance. (1986). Standards and criteria for the development and evaluation of a comprehensive employee assistance program. Rockville, MD: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
34.
WilcoxJ. (1985). Employee assistance programs in the federal government: Hindrances and facilitators to supervisory constructive intervention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
