Bartunek, J.M., & Murninghan, J.K. (1984). The nominal group technique: Expanding the basic procedure and underlying assumptions. Group and Organizational Studies, 9, 417-432.
2.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
3.
Boje, D., & Murninghan, J.K. (1982). Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Management Sciences, 28, 1187-1196.
4.
Cohen, C.E., & Ebbesen, E.B. (1979). Observational goals and schema activation: A theoretical framework for behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 305-329.
5.
Cook, C.W. (1980). Nominal group methods enrich classroom learningEchag The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 5, 33-36.
6.
Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., & Gustafson, D.H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
7.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison prcesses. Human Relations, 7, 114-140.
8.
Frankel, S., Lewandowski, M., & Chan, R. (1984). Demonstration of multidimensional scaling as an evaluation technique: Evaluation of the vertical team concept in an evaluation training program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 193-201.
9.
Green, T.B. (1975). An empirical analysis of nominal and interacting groups. Academy of Management Journal, 18,63-73.
10.
Gustafson, D.H., Shulka, R.K., Delbecq, A., & Walster, G.W. (1973). A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups and Nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 280-291.
11.
Hackman, J.R. (1976). Group influences on individuals. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Janis, I.L. (1975). Victims of groupthinkBoston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Klahr, D. (1969). A Monte Carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure. Psychometrika, 34, 319-330.
14.
Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
17.
Lindblom, C.E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
18.
Lindblom, C.E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517-526.
19.
Maier, N.R.F. (1970). Problem-solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
20.
MacCrimmon, K.R., & Taylor, R.N. (1976). Decision making and problem solving. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
Miner, F.(1979). A comparative analysis of three diverse group decision making approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 81-93.
22.
Osborn, A.F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.
23.
Parrello, V.N., Stimson, J., & Stimson, A. (1985).Rationalization and ritualism in committee decision making. Small Group Behavior, 16, 355-371.
24.
Price, K.H. (1985). Problem-solving strategies: A comparison by problem-solving phases. Group & Organizational Studies, 10, 278-299.
25.
Salancik, G.R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. Staw & G.R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior(pp. 1-54). Chicago: St. Clair Press.
26.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
27.
Sims, H.P., Jr., Gioia, D.A., & Associates. (1986). The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
29.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Stumpf, S., Freedman, R., & Zand, D. (1979). Judgmental decisions: A study of interactions among group membership, group functioning and the decision situation. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 765-782.
31.
Taber, T.D. (1980). The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25(1), 97-106.
32.
Taylor, S.E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E.T. Higgins, P. Hermin, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Torgerson, W.S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
34.
Van de Ven, A.H., & Delbecq, A.L. (1971). Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 203-212.
35.
Weick, K.E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In B. Staw & G.R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1-43). Chicago: St. Clair Press.
36.
White, S.E., Dittrich, J.E., & Lang, J.R. (1980). The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 428-440.