Aitken, A. J., Bailey, R. W., & Hamilton Smith, N. (Eds.). The computer and literary studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1973.
2.
Ager, D. E., Knowles, F. E., & Smith, J. (Eds.). Advances in computer-aided literary and linguistic research. Birmingham, U.K.: University of Aston, 1979.
3.
Brunner, R. D., & Livornese, K.Subjective political change: A prospectus. Boulder: Center for Public Policy Research, University of Colorado, 1982.
4.
Brunner, R. D., & Livornese, K. M.The President's annual message. Boulder: Center for Public Policy Research, University of Colorado, 1984.
5.
Burton, D. M.Automated concordances and word indexes: The fifties. Computers and the Humanities, 1981, 15, 1-14. (a)
6.
Burton, D. M.Automated concordances and word indexes: The early sixties and the early centers. Computers and the Humanities, 1981, 15, 83-100. (b)
7.
Burton, D. M.Automated concordances and word indexes: The process, the programs, and the products. Computers and the Humanities, 1981, 15, 139-154. (c)
8.
Busa, R.Concordances. In A. Kent & H. Lancour (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol. 5). New York: Marcel Dekker, 1971.
9.
Busa, R.The annals of humanities computing: The Index Thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities, 1980, 14, 83-90.
10.
Davis, C. H., & Rush, J. E.Guide to information science. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1979.
11.
Ellis, B., & Favat, F. A.From computer to criticism: An application of automatic content analysis to the study of literature. In P. J. Stone, et al., The General Inquirer. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966.
12.
George, A. L.Propaganda analysis: A study of inferences made from Nazi propaganda in World War II. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1959.
13.
Gerbner, G., Holsti, O. R., Krippendorf, K., Paisley, W. J., & Stone, P. J. (Eds.), The analysis of communication content. New York: Wiley, 1969.
14.
Gillespie, G. W.Data Collection, analysis and research strategies: A framework for organizing the fieldnote file. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 1982, 16, 98-117.
15.
Herlihy, D.Numerical and formal analysis in European history. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1981, 12, 115-135.
16.
Hockey, S.A guide to computer applications in the humanities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
17.
Holsti, O. R.Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
18.
Howard-Hill, T. H.Literary concordances: A guide to the preparation of manual and computer concordances. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979.
19.
Iker, H. P.An historical note on the use of word-frequency contiguities in content analysis. Computers and the Humanities, 1974, 8, 93-98.
20.
Jones, A., & Churchouse, R. F. (Eds.). The computer in literary and linguistic studies. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1976.
21.
Kracauer, S.The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1952-53, 16, 631-642.
22.
Krippendorf, K.Models of messages: Three prototypes. In G. Gerbner et al. (Eds.), The analysis of communication content. New York: Wiley, 1969.
23.
Laffal, J.The contextual associates of sun and God in Schreber's autobiography. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 474-479.
24.
Laffal, J.Schreber's memoirs and content analysis. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1976, 162, 385-390.
25.
Laffal, J.A concept dictionary of English. Essex: Gallery-Halstead, 1973.
26.
Levinson, D. (Ed.). A guide to social theory: Worldwide cross-cultural tests. HRAF theoretical information control system. New Haven, Conn.: Human Relations Area Files, 1977.
27.
Luhn, H. P.Key word-in-context for technical literature. In C. K. Schutz (Ed.), H. P. Luhn: Pioneer of information science. Selected works. New York: Spartan, 1968.
28.
Lusignan, S., & North, J. S. (Eds.). Computing in the humanities. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press, 1977.
29.
McCormack, T.Content analysis: The social history of a method. In T. McCormack (Ed.), Studies in communications (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1982.
30.
McKinnon, A.From co-occurrences to concepts. Computers and the Humanities, 1977, 11, 147-155.
31.
Markoff, J., Shapiro, G., & Weitman, S. R.Toward the integration of content analysis and general methodology. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1975. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
32.
Mitchell, J. L. (Ed.). Computers in the humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974.
33.
Morris, J.A computer-assisted study of a philosophical text. Computers and the Humanities, 1969, 3, 175-178.
34.
Oakman, R. L.Computer methods for literary research. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1980.
35.
Ogilvie, D. M., Stone, P. J., & Kelly, E. F.Computer-aided content analysis. In R. B. Smith & P. K. Manning (Eds.), Handbook of social science methods (Vol. 1). New York: Irvington, 1982.
36.
Patton, P. C., & Holoien, R. A. (Eds.). Computing in the humanities. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1981.
37.
Searle, J. R.Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.
38.
Sedelow. W. A., & Sedelow, S. Y.Formalized historiography, the structure of scientific and literary texts: Part I. Some issues posed by computational methodology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1978, 14, 247-263.
39.
Sedelow, W. A., & Sedelow, S. Y.The history of science as discourse, the structure of science and literary texts: Part II. Some issues posed by computational methodology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1979, 15, 63-72.
40.
Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M., with associates. The General Inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966.
41.
Tallentire, D. R.Toward an archive of lexical norms: A proposal. In A. J. Aitken et al. (Eds.), The computer and literary studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1973.
42.
Travis, I. L., & Fidel, R.Subject analysis. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 17). White Plains, N. Y.: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1982.
43.
Wilks, Y.Machine translation and artificial intelligence. In B. M. Snell (Ed.), Translating and the computer. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1979.
44.
Williams, M. E. (Ed.). Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 16). White Plains, N. Y.: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1981.
45.
Wisbey, R. A. (Ed.). The computer in literary and linguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
46.
Wood, M.Alternatives and options in computer content analysis. Social Science Research, 1980, 9, 273-286.
47.
Wood, M., & Wardell, M. L. G. H.Mead's social behaviorism vs. the astructural bias of symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 1983, 6, 85-96.
48.
Woodrum, E."Mainstreaming" content analysis in social sciences: Methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Social Science Research, 1984, 13, 1-19.
49.
Zimmer, J. M., & Cowles, K. H.Content analysis using FORTRAN: Applied to interviews conducted by C. Rogers, F. Perls, and A. Ellis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972, 19, 161-166.