This article examines the introduction offlexitime in a high-technology organization. In this study, the authors employed a quasi-experimental design that uses both an experimental and a control group and preand postmeasures. They assessed the impact of flexitime on employee perceptions of flexibility, back up, superior-subordinate relations, quality of supervision, job satisfaction, and productivity, using work-group cohesiveness as a moderator variable. The results indicate that employees in highly cohesive work groups reported improvement inflexibility, back up, superior-subordinate relations, and productivity. Employees in groups that lacked cohesion did not report any statistically significant change in any variable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allenspach, H.Flexible working time: Its development and application in Switzerland. Occupational Psychology, 1972, 46(4), 209-215.
2.
Argyris, C.Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1962.
3.
Bolton, J. H.Flexible work hours. Wembley, England: Anbar Publications, Ltd., 1971.
4.
Brayfield, A., & Rothe, H.An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951, 35, 307-311.
5.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.
6.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A.Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
7.
Cooper, R., & Foster, M.Sociotechnical systems. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 467-474.
8.
Elbing, A. A., Gadon, H., & Gordon, J. R. M.Flexible working hours: It's about time. Harvard Business Review, 1974, 52, 19-20, 22-22, 24-24, 26-26, 28-28, 36-36, 154-155.
9.
Evans, M. G.Notes on the impact of flexi-time in a large insurance company. Occupational Psychology, 1973, 47, 237-240.
10.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H., Jr.Organizations: Behavior, structure and process. Dallas: Business Publications, 1979.
11.
Golembiewski, T. R., Hilles, R., & Kagno, M.A longitudinal study of flexi-time effects: Some consequences of an O.D. structural intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 11, 503-532.
12.
Golembiewski, R. T., Yeager, S., & Hilles, R.Some attitudinal and behavioral consequences of a flexi-time installation: One avenue for expressing central organization design values. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), Management of organization design (Vol. 2). New York: North Holland, 1976.
13.
Graf, L. A.The impact of flexitime on the firstline supervisor's job: A preliminary investigation. In J. C. Susbauer (Ed.), Academy of management proceedings (38th Annual Meeting, August 8-13, 1978). San Francisco: Academy of Management, 1978.
14.
Guest, R. H.Organizational change: The effect of successful leadership. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1962.
15.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.Development of job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
16.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L.The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
17.
Kilmann, R.Social systems design. New York: Elsevier, 1976.
18.
Kim, J. S., & Campagna, A. F.Effects of flexitime on employee attendance and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24, 729-741.
19.
Likert, R.The human organization: Its management and value. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
20.
Marrow, A. J., Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E.Management by participation. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
21.
Narayanan, V. K., & Nath, R.The moderating effect of hierarchic level on impact of flextime. Industrial Relations, 1982, 21(2), 216-230.
22.
Nollen, S. D., & Martin, V. H.Alternative work schedules: Flexitime. New York: AMACOM, 1978.
23.
Ogburn, W. F., & Nimkoff, M. F.Technology and the changing family. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1955.
24.
Owen, J. D.Flexi-time: Some problems and solutions. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Winter 1976, 152-160.
25.
Rice, A. K.Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad experiment. London: McGraw-Hill, 1958.
26.
Rousseau, D. M.Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 521-540.
27.
Schein, V. E., Maurer, E. H., & Novak, J. F.Impact of flexible working hours on productivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 463-465.
28.
Seashore, S. F.Group cohesiveness in the industrial work groups. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 1954.
29.
Taylor, J.Some effects of technology in organizational change. In S. Jong & W. B. Storm (Eds.), Tomorrow's organizations. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman & Company, 1973.
30.
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W.Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations, 1951, 4, 3-38.
31.
Trist, E. L., Higgin, G. W., Murray, H., & Pollock, A. B.Organizational choice. London: Tavistock, 1963.
32.
Wade, M.Flexible working hours in practice. Essex, England: Glower Press, 1974.
