This study tests the hypothesis that in a setting in which service volunteers are likely to experience meager egoistic benefits their longevity of participation is inversely related to the extent to which they feel motivated to volunteer by the need for—or expectation of—egoistic benefits. We confirmed this hypothesis in a multiple-regression analysis based on the case records of all volunteers who terminated their participation during a nine-month period in a Big Brothers/Big Sisters program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bronfenbrenner, V.Personality and participation: The case of the vanishing variables. Journal of Social Issues, 1960, 16, 54-63.
2.
Gross, A. E., Wallston, B. S., & Piliavin, I. M.The help recipient's perspective. In D. H. Smith & J. Macaulay (Eds.), Participation in social and political activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
3.
Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M.Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 328-339.
4.
Kemper, T. D.Altruism and voluntary action. In D. H. Smith & J. Macaulay (Eds.), Participation in social and political activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
5.
Lichtenberg, B.On the selection and preparation of the Big Brother volunteer. Social Casework, 1956, 37, 396-400.
6.
McPherson, J. M., & Lockwood, W. G.The longitudinal study of voluntary association memberships: A multivariable analysis. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1980, 9, 74-84.
7.
Meissen, G. J., & Lounsbury, J. W.A comparison of expectations of volunteers, children, and parents in a Big Brother/Big Sister program. Journal of Community Psychology, 1981, 9, 250-256.
8.
Phillips, M. H.Motivation and expectation in successful volunteerism. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1982, 11, 118-125.
9.
Schafer, R. B.Equity in a relationship between individuals and a fraternal organization. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1979, 8, 12-20.
10.
Schindler-Rainman, E., & Lippitt, R.The volunteer community: Creative use of human resources. Arlington, Va.: NTL Institute/ Learning Resources, 1971.
11.
Seidl, F. W.Big Sisters: An experimental evaluation. Adolescence, 1982, 17, 117-128.
12.
Sills, D. L.A sociologist looks at motivation. In N. E. Cohen (Ed.), The citizen volunteer. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.
13.
Smith, D. H.ISSTAL model. In D. H. Smith & J. Macaulay (Eds.), Participation in social and political activities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
14.
Smith, D. H.Altruism, volunteers, and volunteerism. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1981, 10, 21-36.
15.
Smith, D. H.Voluntary action and voluntary groups. In A. Inkeles, J. Coleman, & N. Smelser (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, 1975, 1, 247-270.
16.
Smith, D. H.A psychological model of individual participation in formal voluntary organizations: Application to some Chilean data. American Journal of Sociology, 1966, 72, 249-266.
17.
Smith, D. H., & Reddy, R. D.The impact of voluntary action upon the volunteer/participant. In D. H. Smith (Ed.), Voluntary Action Research: 1973. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1973.
18.
Wollin, G., & Royfe, E. H.Volunteers in Big Brother work. In N. E. Cohen (Ed.), The citizen volunteer. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.
19.
Zurcher, L. A.Ephemeral roles, voluntary action, and voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1978, 7, 65-74.
