This paper calls for the enfranchisement of respondents into research decision making. Respondent participation is one way to overcome respondent posturing to control information. Respondent posturing is produced when researchers create an unbalanced exchange where respondents have no motivation to participate, or when, through their use of rewards, researchers change the rules of the game. Typical researcher-respondent relations are explored in relation to respondent posturing, and the problems and prospects of using respondent participation to create a more open and productive research relationship are examined. We conclude by pointing to respondent relations as an area in which social researchers need to be trained.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C. P.Comparison of questionnaire responses with and without preceding interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 335-340.
2.
Alderfer, C. P.Improving organizational communication through long-term intergroup intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1977, 13, 193-211.
3.
Alderfer, C. P., & Brown, L. D.Learning from changing. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975.
4.
Argyris, C.Diagnosing defenses against the outsider. Journal of Social Issues, 1952, 8, 24-34.
5.
Argyris, C.Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
6.
Blau, P.Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.
7.
Berm, D.Self-deception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74. 183-200.
8.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S.Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: Wiley, 1975.
9.
Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R.Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962.
10.
Brown, L. D., & Tandon, R.Interviews as catalysts in a community setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63. 197-205.
11.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
12.
Colletta, N. J.Participatory research or participation put-down? Reflections on an Indonesian experiment in non-formal education. Convergence, 1976, 9. 32-46.
13.
Dachler, P. H., & Wilpert, B.Conceptual dimensions and boundaries in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23. 1-39.
14.
Dean, J. P., & Whyte, W. F.How do you know the informant is telling the truth?Human Organization, 1958, 12, 34-38.
15.
Etzioni, A.A comparative analysis of complex organizations (rev. ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1975.
16.
Fordham, P., Poulton, G., & Randle, L.A question of participation: Action research in the New Communities Project. Convergence. 1976, 10, 54-67.
17.
Goering, J. M., & Cummins, M.Intervention research and the survey process. Journal of Social Issues, 1970, 26, 49-55.
18.
Gouldner, A. W.Explorations in applied social science. In A. W. Gouldner & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Applied sociology: Opportunities and problems. New York: The Free Press, 1965.
19.
Hall, B. L.Participatory research: An approach for change. Convergence, 1975, 8. 25-33.
20.
Hall, B. L.Participatory research: Expanding the basis of analysis. International Development Review, 1977, 19, 23-26.
21.
Heller, F. A.Group feedback analysis: A method of field research. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 108-117.
22.
Hessler, R. M., New, P., & May, T. J.Conflict, consensus, and exchange. Social Problems, 1980, 27, 320-329.
23.
Kelman, H. C.The rights of subjects in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 989-1016.
24.
Lawler, E., & Drexler, J.Participative research: The subject as coresearcher. In E. Lawler, D. Nadler & C. Cammann, Organizational assessment. Toronto: Wiley, 1980.
25.
Lawler, E., Nadler, D., & Cammann, C.Process issues in organizational assessment. In E. Lawler, D. Nadler, & C. Cammann, Organizational assessment. Toronto: Wiley, 1980.
26.
Locke, H. J.Are volunteer interviewers representative?Social Problems, 1954, 1, 143-146.
27.
Maccoby, M.The gamesman. New York: Bantam Books, 1977.
28.
Maruyama, M.Endogenous research vs. "experts" from outside. Futures, 1974, 6, 389-394.
29.
Mirvis, P., & Seashore, S.Being ethical in organizational research. In E. Lawler, D. Nadler & C. Cammann, Organizational assessment. Toronto: Wiley, 1980.
30.
Norman, R. P.A review of some problems related to the mail questionnaire technique. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1947, 8, 235-247.
31.
Orne, M. T.On the social psychology of the psychology experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776-783.
32.
Orne, M. T., & Evans, F. J.Social control in the psychological experiment: Antisocial behavior and hypnosis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 11, 189-209.
33.
Pilsworth, M., & Ruddock, R.Some criticisms of survey research methods in adult education. Convergence, 1975, 8, 25-33.
34.
Reicken, H. W.A program for research on experiments in social psychology. In N. G. Washburne (Ed.), Decisions, values and groups, Vol. 2. New York: Pergamon, 1962.
35.
Rosenberg, M. J.When dissonance fails: On limiting evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 28-42.
36.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.The volunteer subject. In R. Rosenthal & R. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
37.
Sanford, N.What ever happened to action research?Journal of Social Issues, 1970, 26, 3-24.
38.
Schensul, S.Anthropological fieldwork and socio-political change. Social Problems, 1980, 26, 309-320.
39.
Scott, R., & Shore, A.Why sociology does not apply. New York: Elsevier, 1979.
40.
Swantz, M. L.Research as an educational tool for development. Convergence, 1975, 8, 44-53.
41.
Whyte, W. F.Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.
