Investigating three samples of social policy research in The Netherlands, the authors analyzed the conditions and functions influencing utilization (impact). Interorganizational context, intergroup relations, and role interaction were found to relate to utilization. The impact of social policy research upon organizational decisions is cognitive, communicative, and diagnostic. The cognitive function correlates negatively with publishing for scholarly audiences. Of the communicative function, six feedback strategies were evaluated with targeting scoring highest on impact. In the diagnostic function, creating consensus among decision-making groups has the greatest impact on decision making. The results suggest the latent operation of a professional paradigm of social policy research, distinct from the disciplinary social science paradigm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bobbit, H. R., Breinholt, R. H., Dokter, R. H., & McNaul, J. P.Organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
2.
Bohrnstedt, G. W.A quick method for determining the reliability and validity of multipleitem scales. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 542-548.
3.
Bohrnstedt, G. W.Reliability and validity assessment in attitude measurement. In G. Sommers (Ed.), Attitude measurement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1971.
4.
Bursk, E. C., & Sethi, B. S.The in-house advertising agency. Paper reported in Philip D. Dougherty, The in-house agency backed, The New York Times, Oct. 8, 1975, p. 65-65.
5.
Cherlin, A., & Horiuchi, S.Retrospective reports on family structure. Sociological Methods and Research, 1980, 8, 454-469.
6.
Coleman, J. S.Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, N. Y.: General Learning Press, 1972.
7.
Dean, J. P., & Whyte, W. F.How do you know if the informant is telling the truth? In J. Bynner & K. M. Stribley (Eds.), Social research, principles and procedures. London: Longman, 1979. Pp. 179-188.
8.
Denzin, N. K.The research act. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
9.
Downie, N. M., & Heath, R. W.Basic statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
10.
Etzioni, A.Policy research. The American Sociologist, 1971, 6, 8-12.
11.
Galtung, J.Theory and methods of social research. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.
12.
Janowitz, M.Sociological methods and social policy. Morristown, N. Y.: General Learning Press, 1972.
13.
Kerlinger, F. N.The foundations of social research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
14.
Kuhn, T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
15.
Kuhn, T. S.Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1974. Pp. 459-482.
16.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Reitz, J. G.An introduction to applied sociology. New York: Elsevier, 1975.
17.
Masterman, M.The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Pp. 59-89.
18.
Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P.The focussed interview. New York: The Free Press, 1956.
19.
Morrissey, J. P., & Steadman, H. J.Practice or perish? Some overlooked career contingencies for sociologists in nonacademic settings. The American Sociologist, 1977, 12, 154-161.
20.
Moynihan, D. P.Maximum feasible misunderstanding. New York: The Free Press, 1969.
21.
Myrdal, G.Objectivity in social research. New York: Pantheon Press, 1969.
22.
Neale, J. M., & Liebert, R. M.Science and behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
23.
Rothman, J.Planning & organizing for social change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
24.
Rule, J. B.Insight and social betterment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
25.
Scott, R. A., & Shore, A. R.Why sociology does not apply. New York: Elsevier, 1979.
26.
Smith, H. W.Strategies of social research. London: Prentice-Hall International, 1975.
27.
Szymanski, A. Malinowski, Marx and functionalism. The Insurgent Sociologist, 1972, 2, 35-42.
28.
Thompson, J. D., & Tuden, A.Strategies, structures and processes of organizational decision. In J. D. Thompson et al. (Eds.), Comparative studies in administration, Vol. 11, 1959. Pp. 14-38.
29.
van de Vall, M.Utilization and methodology of applied social science. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11, 14-38.
30.
van de Vall, M.A theoretical framework for applied social research. In F. Baker & M. Schulberg (Eds.), Program evaluation in the health fields, Volume 2. New York: Behavioral Sciences Press, 1979. Pp. 395-419.
31.
van de Vail, M., & Bolas, C.Policy research as an agent of planned social intervention. Sociological Practice, 1977, 2, 77-95.
32.
van de Vall, M., & Bolas, C.Applied social science discipline research or social policy research: The emergence of a professional paradigm in sociological research. The American Sociologist, 1980, 15, 128-137.
33.
van de Vall, M., & Bolas, C.External vs. internal social policy researchers. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1981, 2, 461-481.
34.
van de Vall, M., Bolas, C., & Kang, T. S.Applied social research in industrial organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1976, 12, 158-177.
35.
van de Vall, M., & King, C. D.Comparing models of workers participation in managerial decision making. In D. Graves (Ed.), Management research, A cross-cultural comparison. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1973. Pp. 95-114.
36.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L.Unobtrusive measures. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
37.
Weiss, C. H.Research for policy's sake. In H. E. Freeman (Ed.), Policy studies review annual, Vol. 2. 1978. Pp. 67-81.
38.
Williams, W.Implementation analysis and assessment. In W. Williams & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Social program implementation. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Pp. 267-292.
