This study examines the norms of jury selection, determines which norms are most important in qualifying individuals for jury service, and discusses how the interpretation and application of these norms influence the racial composition of juries as blacks progress from the jury list to the jury panel and to the jury box. The data come from a questionnaire survey of 1,551 legal personnel-district clerks, jury commissioners, state attorneys, defense attorneys, and judges-who are most directly associated with state petit trial juries in 325 counties of eight Southern states with large black populations. The results indicate that blacks are significantly underrepresented at several jury selection stages. Some of the reasons for this underrepresentation are related to unsupervised and unauthorized discretionary jury selection procedures and the systematic striking of blacks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alker, H. R., & Barnard, J. J.Procedural and social cases in the jury selection process. The Justice System Journal, 1978, 3, 220-241.
2.
Alker, H. R., Hosticka, C., & Mitchell, M.Jury selection as a biased social process. Law and Society Review, 1976, 11, 9-41.
3.
Beiser, E. N.Are juries representative?Judicature, 1973, 57, 194-199.
4.
Boags, C., & Boags, R. M.The misuse of a socalled psychological examination for the selection of jurors. In C. Thomas (Ed.), Boys no more: A black psychologist's view of community. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Glencoe Press, 1971. Pp. 48-64.
5.
Coe, K.Juror utilization in three selected Oklahoma district courts. Oklahoma Law Review, 1976, 29, 65-109.
6.
Cornish, W. R.The jury. London: Allen-Lane, 1968.
7.
Erlanger, S. M.Jury research in America. Law and Society Review, 1970, 4, 345-370.
8.
Friedman, L. (Ed.). Southern justice. New York: Pantheon Books, 1963.
9.
Greenberg, J.Race relations and American law. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
10.
Handman, L. R.Underrepresentation of economic groups on federal juries. Boston University Law Review, 1977, 57, 198-224.
11.
Hawrish, E., & Tate, E.Determinants of jury selection. Saskatchewan Law Review, 1974-75, 39, 285-392.
12.
Hearings before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary. Civil rights, U.S. 89th Congress, 2nd Session on S. 3296, Amendment 561 to S. 3296, S. 1497, S. 1654, S. 2845, S. 2846, S. 2923 and S. 3170. June 6-10, 13-16, 21-22, 25, 28, 1966. Part 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.
13.
Hearings before the Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery of the Committee on the Judiciary. Federal jury selection, U.S. Senate, 90th Congress; 1st Session on S. 383, S. 384, S. 385, S. 386, S. 387, S. 989, S. 1319. Proposals to Improve Judicial Machinery for the Selection of Federal Juries. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.
14.
Jury discrimination in the South: A remedy. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 1972, 8, 589-620.
15.
Jury selection in California. Stanford Law Review, 1952, 5, 247-273.
16.
Kalven, H. J., & Zeisel, H.The American jury. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown & Company, 1966.
17.
Krause, K. M.Jury selection-sixth amendment right to a fair cross section of the community -a change in emphasis. Missouri Law Review, 1976, 41, 446-457.
18.
Kuhn, R. S.Jury discrimination: The next phase. Southern California Law Review, 1968, 41, 235-328.
19.
Lindquist, C. A.An analysis of juror selection as procedure in the United States district courts. Temple Law Journal, 1967, 41, 32-50.
20.
McKusick, V. L., & Boxer, D. E.Uniform jury selection and service act. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 1971, 8, 280-309.
21.
Michael, M., Mullin, C., O'Reilly, J., & Rowan, J. V.Challenges to jury composition in North Carolina. North Carolina Central Law Journal, 1975, 7, 1-24.
22.
Mills, E. S.A statistical profile of jurors in a United States district court. The Law and the Social Order, 1969, 329-339.
23.
Odom, P.Jury selection in Florida. University of Florida Law Review, 1963, 15, 500-527.
24.
Rhine, J.The jury: A reflection of the prejudices of the community. Hastings Law Journal, 1969, 20, 1417-1445.
25.
Stephan, C.Selective characteristics of jurors and litigants: Their influences on juries verdicts. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America: A critical overview. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975. Pp. 97-117.
26.
Strong, D. S.Negroes, ballots, and judges: National voting rights legislation in the federal courts. University, Ala: University of Alabama Press, 1968.
27.
Tucker, S. W.Racial discrimination in jury selection in Virginia. Virginia Law Review, 1966, 52, 736-750.
28.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Political participation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.
29.
U.S. Department of Justice. National survey of court organization: 1971. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
30.
Van Amburg, L.A case study of the peremptory challenge: A subtle strike at equal protection and due process. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 1974, 18, 616-683.
31.
Van Dyke, J. M.Jury selection procedures: Our uncertain commitment to representative juries. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1977.
32.
Villeneuve, J. J.Comments: Challenging the juror selection system in New York. Albany Law Review, 1972, 36, 305-329.
33.
Winters, G. R. (Ed.). The jury: Selected readings. Chicago: American Judicature Society, 1971.
