Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. The new grass roots government?Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
2.
Appleby, M.Nuts and bolts of citizen involvement. Blacksburg, Virginia: Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1977.
3.
Arnstein, S.A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35, 216-224.
4.
Arnstein, S.Maximum feasible manipulation. Public Administration Review, 1972, 32, 377-390.
5.
Berkley, G. E.The craft of public administration. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1975.
6.
Bonfield, A. E.Public participation in federal rulemaking relating to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1970, 540, 540-611.
7.
Booth, H.Direct action organizing. Chicago: The Midwest Academy, 1977.
8.
Brooks, W. G.Health care and poor people. In E. S. Cahn & B. A. Passett (Eds.), Citizen participation: Affecting community change. New York: Praeger, 1971.
9.
Bultena, G. L., & Rogers, D. L.Considerations in determining the public interest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1974, 29, 168-173.
10.
Burke, E.Citizen participation strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1968, 34, 287-294.
11.
Catanese, A.Planners and local politics: Impossible dreams. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1974.
12.
Checkoway, B., et al. Citizen participation technology. Monticello, Ill.: Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliography, 1977.
13.
Checkoway, B., & Van Til, J.What do we know about citizen participation? In S. Langton (Ed.), Citizen participation in America. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1978.
14.
Clapp, C. L.The congressman: His world as he sees it. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1964.
15.
Cramton, R.The why, where, and how of broadened public participation in the administrative process. Georgetown Law Journal, 1972, 60, 422-447.
16.
Creamer, D.Planning your own public hearing. Chicago: The Midwest Academy, 1977.
17.
Dahl, R. A.After the revolution?New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1970.
18.
Delbecq, A. L., et al. Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1975.
19.
Duby, S. N.Community action programs and citizen participation: Issues and confusions. Social Work, 1970, 15, 76-84.
20.
Edelman, M.Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Markham, 1974.
21.
Eisinger, P.Protest behavior and the integration of urban political systems. Journal of Politics, 1971, 33, 980-1007.
22.
Eliot, C. W.Citizen support for planning and development. Planning and Civic Comment, 1945, 10, 1-12.
23.
Federal Regional Council. Citizen participation handbook. New York: Federal Regional Council, 1976.
24.
Fox, J., & Wible, K.Information generation and communication to establish environmental quality objectives. Natural Resources Journal, 1973, 13, 134-149.
25.
Friedmann, J.Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1973.
26.
Gans, H. J.The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian Americans. New York: The Free Press, 1962.
27.
Gordon, R.We interrupt this program.. .a citizen's guide to using the media for social change.. Amherst, Mass.: Citizen Involvement Training Project, 1978.
28.
Hartman, C.Yerba Buena: Land grab and community assistance in San Francisco. San Francisco: Glide, 1975.
29.
Haywood, G. C.Public relations in planning. In Planning 1950. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials, 1950.
30.
Heberlein, T. A.Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement: The hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop and the quasie xperiment. Natural Resources Journal, 1976, 16, 197-212.
31.
Hendee, J. C., et al. Public involvement and the Forest Service: Experience, effectivness, and suggested directions. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service, 1973.
32.
Huitt, R.The congressional committee: A case study. American Political Science Review, 1954, 48, 340-365.
33.
Kasperson, R.E., & Brietbart, M.Participation, decentralization, and advocacy planning. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers, 1974.
34.
Keyes, L. C., Jr.The rehabilitation planning game: A study in the diversity of neighborhoods. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969.
35.
Klein, T., & Danzig, F.How to be heard: Making the media work for you. New York: MacMillan, 1974.
36.
Lane, R. E.Political life: Why and how people get involved in politics. New York: The Free Press, 1959.
37.
Langton, S. (Ed.). Citizen participation in America. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1978.
38.
Lenny, D. M.The case for funding citizen participation in the administrative process. Administrative Law Review, 1976, 28, 483-510.
39.
Lipsky, M.Street level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s: Politics, administration, and citizen participation. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 1973.
40.
Lorimer, J.A citizen's guide to city politics. Toronto: James Lewis and Samuel, 1972.
41.
Lupo, A., et al. Rites of way: The politics of transportation in Boston. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.
42.
Meyerson, M., & Banfield, E. C.Politics, planning, and the public interest: The case of public housing in Chicago. New York: The Free Press, 1955.
43.
Milbrath, L. W.Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
44.
Mollenkopf, J. H.The post-war politics of urban development. Politics and Society, 1975, 5, 247-295.
45.
Morris, M. D.Citizen participation. Focus, 1977, 5, 4-5.
46.
Mueller, C.The politics of communications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
47.
Nathan, R., et al. Block grants for community development. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1977.
48.
National Commission on Urban Problems. Building the American city. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
49.
Needleman, M. L., & Needleman, C. E.Guerrillas in the bureaucracy: The community planning experiment in the United States. New York: John Wiley, 1974.
50.
Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission. An innovative public hearing. Chicago: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, 1975.
51.
Perfater, M.Citizen participation and the role of the public hearing. Charlottes-ville: Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, 1975.
52.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A.Regulating the poor: The functions of public welfare. New York: Vintage Books, 1971.
53.
Redburn, S., et al. How representative are mandated citizen participation processes?Urban Affairs Quarterly, 1980, 15, 345-352.
54.
Rosener, J. B.Citizen participation: Tying strategy to function. Public Management, 1975, 12, 16-19.
55.
Selznick, P.TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1949.
56.
Sinclair, M.The public hearing as a participatory device: Evaluation of the IJC experience. In W. R. D. Sewell & J. T. Coppock (Eds.), Public participation in planning. New York: John Wiley, 1977.
57.
Spence, J. C.A case study of Seabrook nuclear station, In F. Clemente et al. (Eds.), Public participation in energy related decision making: Six case studies. McLean, Va.: Mitre Corporation, 1977.
58.
Spiegel, H. B. C.Citizen participation in federal programs: A review. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1971, 1, 4-31.
59.
Stewart, W. H., Jr.Citizen participation in public administration. Birmingham: Bureau of Public Administration, University of Alabama, 1976.
60.
U.S. Department, of Housing and Urban Development. Community development block grant program: Second annual report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1976.
61.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Effective citizen participation in transportation planning. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1976.
62.
U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs. Public participation in regulatory agency proceedings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
63.
U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure. Hearings on S. 270. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
64.
U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations. Confidence and concern: Citizens view American government. Cleveland, Ohio: Regal Books, 1974.
65.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H.Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
66.
Walton, L. E., Jr., & Saroff, J. R.Citizen participation in public hearings in Virginia. Charlottesville: Virginia Highway Research Council, 1971.
67.
Webber, M. M., & Webber, C. C.Culture, territoriality and the elastic mile. In H. W. Eldredge (Ed.), Taming megalopolis. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1967.
68.
Wengert, N.Public participation in water planning: A critique of theory, doctrine, and practice. Water Resources Bulletin, 1971, 7, 16-32.
69.
White, G. F.The role of public opinion. In C. R. Goldman et al. (Eds.), Environmental quality and water development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973.
70.
Wilson, J. Q.Planning and politics: Citizen participation in urban renewal. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1963, 29, 242-249.
71.
Winholtz, W. G.Planning and the public. In W. I. Goodman & E. C. Freund (Eds.), Principles and practice of urban planning. Washington, D.C.: International City Managers Association, 1968.
72.
Yukubovsky, R.Citizen participation in transportation planning: A selected bibliography. Albany:% New York State Department of Transportation, 1972.
