Converse, P. E.The dynamics of party identification. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1976.
2.
Glenn, N. D.Cohort analysts' futile quest: Statistical attempts to separate age, period, and cohort effects. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 900-904.
3.
Glenn, N. D.Cohort analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1977.
4.
Glenn, N. D.Values, attitudes, and beliefs. In O. G. Brim & J. Kagan (Eds.), Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980. Pp. 596-640.
5.
Glenn, N. D.Age, birth cohorts, and drinking: An illustration of the hazards of inferring effects from cohort data. Journal of Gerontology, in press.
6.
Glenn, N. D., & Hefner, T.Further evidence on aging and party identification. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, 36, 31-47.
7.
Glenn, N. D., & Zody, R. E.Cohort analysis with national survey data. Gerontologist, 1970, 10, 233-240.
8.
Mason, K. O., Mason, W., Winsborough, H. H., & Poole, W. K.Some methodological issues in the cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review, 1973, 38, 242-258.
9.
Pullum, T. W.Parametrizing age, period, and cohort effects: An application to U.S. delinquency rates, 1964-1973. In K. F. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 1978. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977. Pp. 116-140.