A team development intervention was conducted with 22 three- and four-person work groups from an engineering survey course. For comparison purposes, 22 work groups from the surveying course served as controls and an additional 23 groups were observed to measure any possible Hawthorne effect. Random assignment of subjects to groups and groups to conditions resulted in a post-test-only control group experimental design.
The major findings were:
1. Work groups experiencing team development did not perform better than controls.
2. Individuals in groups receiving team development perceived their group as being more effective and reported greater participation than members of control groups.
3. There was a nonsignificant tendency for individuals in groups receiving team development to express greater agreement on group goals.
4. There were no statistically significant differences between individuals in treatment and control groups in terms of: (a) perceived learning, (b) expressed satisfaction with group performance, or (c) expressed satisfaction with the group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C. P.Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press, 1972.
2.
Alderfer, C. P.Organization development. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 1977, 28, 197-223.
3.
Argyris, C.Organization and innovation. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey, 1965.
4.
Beckhard, R., & Lake, D. G.Shortand long-range effects of a team development effort. In H. Hornstein, B. Bunker, W. Burke, M. Grindes, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Social intervention: A behavioral science approach. New York: Free Press, 1971. Pp. 421-439.
5.
Beer, M.The technology of organization development. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976. Pp. 937-993.
6.
Bigelow, R. C.Changing classroom interaction through organization development. In R. A. Schmuck & M. B. Miles (Eds.), Organization development in schools. Palo Alto, Calif.: National Press Books, 1971. Pp. 71-85.
7.
Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S., Barnes, L. S., & Greiner, L. E.Breakthrough in organization development. Harvard Business Review, 1964, 42 (6), 133-138.
8.
Bragg, J. E., & Andrews, J. R.Participative decision making: An experimental study in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9, 727-735.
9.
Brown, L. D., Aram, J. D., & Bachner, D. J.Interorganizational information sharing: A successful intervention that failed. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10, 533-554.
10.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
11.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T.The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976. Pp. 223-326.
12.
Cronbach, L. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297-334.
13.
Finn, J. D.A general model for multivariate analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1974.
14.
Fosmire, F., Keutzer, C., & Diller, R.Starting up a new senior high school. In R. A. Schmuck & M. R. Miles (Eds.), Organization development in schools. Palo Alto, Calif.: National Press Books, 1971. Pp. 87-112.
15.
French, W. L., & Bell, C. H.Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement (2nd. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
16.
French, W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A.Organization development: Theory, practice, and research. Dallas: Business Publications, Inc., 1978.
17.
Friedlander, F.Performance and interactional dimensions of organizational work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, 257-265.
18.
Friedlander, F.The impact of organizational training laboratories upon the effectiveness and interaction of ongoing work groups. Personnel Psychology, 1967, 20, 289-307.
19.
Friedlander, F., & Brown, L. D.Organization development. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 1974, 25, 313-341.
20.
Gibb, J. R.TORI group self-diagnosis scale. In J. E. Jones & J. W. Pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1977 annual handbook for group facilitators. La Jolla, Calif.: University Associates, 1977. Pp. 75-81.
21.
Golembiewski, R. T.Renewing organizations: The laboratory approach to planned change. Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1972.
22.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.The job diagnostic survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. Technical Report No. 4, Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale University, 1974.
23.
Hand, H. H., Estafen, B. D., & Sims, H. P.How effective is data survey and feedback as a technique of organization development? An experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11, 333-347.
24.
Hautaluoma, J. E., & Gavin, J. F.Effects of organizational diagnosis and intervention on blue-collar "blues."Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11, 475-496.
25.
Kimberly, J. R., & Nielsen, W. R.Organization development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 191-206.
26.
King, D. C., Sherwood, J. J., & Manning, M. R.OD's research base: How to expand and utilize it. Paper presented at the OD 78 Conference of Current Theory, Practice, and Research. San Francisco, March 16-17, 1978.
27.
Likert, R.The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
28.
Luke, R. A., Block, P., Davey, J. M., & Averch, V. R.A structural approach to organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9, 611-635.
29.
Marrow, A. J., Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E.Management by participation. New York: Harper & Row, 1967.
30.
Nadler, D. A., & Pecorella, P. A.Differential effects of multiple interventions in an organization. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11, 348-366.
31.
Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
32.
Schmuck, R. A., Murray, D., Smith, M. A., Schwartz, M., & Runkel, M.Consultation for innovative schools: OD for multiunit structure. Eugene, Ore.: Center for Educational Policy and Management, 1975.
33.
Schmuck, R. A., & Runkel, P. J.Handbook of organization development in schools. Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1972.
34.
Schmuck, R. A., Runkel, P. J., & Langmeyer, D.Improving organizational problem solving in a school faculty. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969, 5, 455-482.
35.
Spector, P. E.What to do with significant multivariate effects in multivariate analyses of variance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 158-163.
36.
Taylor, J., & Bowers, D.Survey of organizations. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1972.
37.
Woodman, R. W. Effects of team development intervention: A field experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1978.
38.
Woodman, R. W., & Sherwood, J. J.A comprehensive look at job design. Personnel Journal, 1977, 56, 384-390, 418-418.
39.
Woodman, R. W., & Sherwood, J. J.The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin. (in press)
