Inconsistencies in the Argyris Intervention Theory

Abstract

In his Intervention Theory and Method, Argyris postulated that an interventionist has three primary tasks: to generate valid information, to foster free choice, and to achieve internal commitment. There appear to be logical and empirical inconsistencies, however, between these primary tasks and (a) the proposition that change is not a primary task, (b) the method of validation, (c) the existence of both incompatible choices and prohibited choices, (d) the proposition that an effective system achieves its objectives and maintains viability, and (e) the demonstrable identification of Argyris with top management. In the present article, these inconsistencies are analyzed, and some of their theoretical and practical implications are discussed.