Application of Social Judgment Theory in Policy Formulation: An Example

Abstract

Disagreement and protracted argument often frustrate boards and committees charged with developing and implementing public policy. This study describes an effort to minimize irrelevant dispute within a municipal committee charged with acquisition of land to be used for "open space." Social Judgment Theory and interactive computer graphics procedures were used to identify cognitive sources of disagreement among members of the committee with regard to the acquisition of land for open space purposes. Making overt the differences in the relative importance of the factors underlying individual policies resulted in a reduction of the disagreement. Conflict was thus avoided in attaining a compromise policy, the concrete consequences of which were formally adopted by the committee. Strengths and weaknesses of this approach to policy formulation were revealed through a follow-up evaluation, and specific suggestions are given for enhancing the impact of the method in future applications.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman, L. , Stewart, T.R. , & Hammond, K.R. A case history of the application of Social Judgment Theory to policy formulation. Policy Sciences, 1975, 6, 137-159.

Balke, W.M. , Hammond, K.R. , & Meyer, G.D. An alternate approach to labor-management relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1973, 18, 311-327.

Earle, T.C. Interpersonal learning. In L. Rappoport and D.A. Summers (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

Hammond, K.R. Computer graphics as an aid to learning. Science, 1971, 172, 903-908.

Hammond, K.R. Inductive knowing. In J.R. Royce and W.N. Rozeboom (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. London: Gordon & Breach, 1972.

Hammond, K. R. , & Brehmer, B. Quasi-rationality and distrust: Implications for international conflict. In L. Rappoport and D.A. Summers (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

Hammond, K.R. , Stewart, T.R. , Adelman, L. , & Wascoe, N. Report to the Denver City Council and Mayor regarding the choice of handgun ammunition for the Denver Police Department (Program of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction Report No. 179). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1975.

Hammond, K.R. , Stewart, T.R. , Brehmer, B. , & Steinmann, D.O. Social Judgment Theory. In M.F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes: Formal and mathematical approaches. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Mumpower, J.L. , & Hammond, K.R. Entangled task dimensions: An impediment to interpersonal learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 11, 377-389.

10.

Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

11.

Slovic, P. , & Lichtenstein, S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. In L. Rappoport and D.A. Summers (Eds.), Human judgment and social interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

12.

Stewart, T.R. , & Carter, J.E. POLICY: An interactive computer program for externalizing, executing, and refining judgmental policy (Program of Research on Humais Judgment and Social Interaction Report No. 159). Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1973.