The Michigan ICL Study Revisited: An Alternative Explanation of the Results

Alderfer, C. , & Ferris, R. Understanding the impact of survey feedback. In W. Burke and H. Hornstein (Eds.), The social technology of organization development. Fairfax, Va.: NTL Learning Resources Corp., 1972. Pp. 234-243.

Aronson, S. , & Sherwood, C. Researcher versus practitioner: Problems in social action research. Social Work, 1967, 12, 89-96.

Baumgartel, H. Using employee questionnaire results for improving organizations. Kansas Business Review, 1959, pp. 2-6.

Berk, R. Collective behavior. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown Co., 1974.

Bohrnstedt, G. Observations on the measurement of change. In E. Borgatta (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. Pp. 113-136.

Bowers, D. OD techniques and their results in 23 organizations: The Michigan ICL study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9(2), 21-43.

Bowers, D. , & Franklin, J. Survey-guided development: Using human resources measurement in organizational change. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1972, 1(3), 43-55.

Chase, P. A survey feedback approach to organization development. In The Proceedings of the Executive Study Conference. Princeton, NJ.: Educational Testing Service, 1968.

Cronbach, J. , Gleser, G. , Nanda, H. , & Rajartnam, N. The dependability of behavioral generalizability for scopes and profiles. New York: Wiley, 1972.

Friedlander, F. A comparative study of consulting processes and group development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4(4), 377-399.

Friedlander, F. , & Brown, D. Organizational development. Annual Review of Psychology, 1974, 25, 313-341.

Golembiewski, R. , & Munzenrider, R. Social desirability as an intervening variable in interpreting OD effects. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11(3), 317-332.

Graham, H. , & Gurr, T. The history of violence in America. New York: Bantam Books, 1970.

Harris, C. Problems in measuring change. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.

Hunt, R. , & Lichtman, C. Pretest influences in evaluating the organizational effects of a supervisory counseling training program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972, 8(4), 503-506.

King, D. , & Sherwood, J. Monitoring the process and evaluating the results of organization development. Paper presented at the third New Technology in Organization Development Conference (NTL Institute), New Orleans, 1974.

Klein, S. , Kraut, A. , & Wolfson, A. Employee reactions to attitude survey feedback: A study of the impact of structure and process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 497-514.

Lana, R. Pretest sensitization. In R. Rosenthal and R. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 121-140.

Miles, M. , Hornstein, H. , Callahan, D. , Calder, P. , & Schiavo, R. The consequences of survey feedback: Theory and evaluation. In W. Bennis , K. Benne , and R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969. Pp. 456-468.

Neff, F. Survey research: A tool for problem diagnosis and improvement in organizations. In S. Miller and W. Gouldner (Eds.), Applied sociology. New York: Free Press, 1965.

Peak, H. Attitudes and motivation. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska, 1955.

Roethlisberger, F. , & Dickson, W. Management and the worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939.

Solomon, R. Extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 1949, 46, 137-150.

Suchman, E. Action for what? A critique of evaluation research. In R. O'Toole (Ed.), The organization, management, and tactics of social research. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1970.

Taylor, J. & Bowers, D. Survey of Organizations: A machine-scored standardized questionnaire instrument. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, 1972.

Weiss, R. , & Rein, M. The evaluation of broad-aim programs: Experimental design, its difficulties, and an alternative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15(1), 97-109.