Goal Setting,T-Group Participation,and Self-Rated Change: An Experimental Study

Abstract

Choice of a goal for self-change and participation in a T Group were varied in an orthogonal design in an experimental study of the relative effects of goal selection and T-Group participation. The Ss were high school seniors assigned for one semester to one of four conditions: I) both T Group and change goal, II) T Group but not change goal, III) neither change goal nor T Group, or IV) change goal but no T Group. At semester's end all Ss evaluated themselves on their change along the goal dimensions. It was found that students who had participated in a T Group showed significantly more change toward their selected goal than those who had not (F = 6.8, df = 1.32, p < .05). An unanticipated finding was the negative effect of the goal-setting exercise; goal selection seems to have limited the overall benefits of T-Group participation, and for those students who set a goal but did not have T-Group experience, the goal selection seems to have had a negative effect on their global change as well as on their progress toward their change goal. It was concluded that the "revolution of rising expectations" may operate on an individual as well as on a community level; potential change agents should be aware of the dangers this may create.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradford, L. , Gibb, J. , & Benne, K. T-group theory and laboratory method. New York: Wiley, 1964.

Bunker, D. Individual applications of laboratory training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 131-148.

Burke, R. , & Bennis, W. Changes in perceptions of self and others during human relations training. Human Relations, 1961, 14, 165-182.

Cohen, A. Attitude change and social influence. New York: Basic Books, 1964.

Dunnette, M.

People feeling: Joy, more joy, and the "slough of despond."

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969, 5, 25-44.

Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1957.

Gibb, J. Effects of human relations training. In A. Bergin and S. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 1969.

Himber, C. Evaluating sensitivity training for teenagers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1970, 6, 307-322.

Insel, P. , & Moos, R. An experimental investigation of process and outcome in an encounter group. Human Relations, 1972, 25, 441-447.

10.

Kausler, D. H. Aspiration level as a determinant of performance. Journal of Personality, 1959, 27, 346-351.

11.

Kay, E. , French, J. , & Meyer, H. A study of the performance appraisal interview. Management Development and Employee Relations Services, General Electric Company, New York, 1962.

12.

Kolb, D. , & Boyatzis, R. Goal-setting and self-directed behavior change. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1968.

13.

Kolb, D. , Winter, S. , & Berlew, D. Self-directed change: Two studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, 453-473.

14.

Lewin, K. Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb and E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt, 1947.

15.

Lieberman, M. , Yalom, I. , & Miles, M. Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

16.

Likert, R. The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

17.

McClelland, D. Toward a theory of motive acquisition. Aimerican Psychologist, 1965, 20, 321-333.

18.

McGregor, D. The human side of enterprise. New York: Van Nostrand, 1960.

19.

Miles, M. Changes during and following laboratory training: A clinical experimental study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 215-242.

20.

Rogers, C. The process of the basic encounter group. In W. Bennis , E. Schein , D. E. Berlew , and F. I. Steele (Eds.), Interpersonal dynamics. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1968. Rev. ed.

21.

Yalom, I. , & Lieberman, M. A study of encounter group casualties. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971, 25, 16-30.