"Some Effects of Trainers on Their T Groups" Reconsidered

Abstract

The identity of T-Group trainer effectiveness indicators in Bolman's studies (1971a & 1973) was pursued through comprehensive analyses of intermeasure correlations. Labeled the Acceptance versus Rejection of Others (ARO), a powerful undergirding dimension was found more potent than the Congruence-empathy indicator stressed by Bolman. ARO closely resembles the Love/Hostility dimension salient in much independent research, including the Caring factor found important to the encounter group leader's effectiveness by Lieberman, Yalom, and Miles (1973) and the Consideration factor of the Ohio State leadership scales. Perhaps due to limitations of his measures, Bolman's data yielded surprisingly weak traces of the second principal interpersonal dimension, Dominance/Submission. It seemed well represented by Meaning Attribution in Lieberman et al.'s research and by Initiating Structure in the Ohio State work.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolman, L. G. Some effects of trainers on their groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7, 309-325. (a)

Bolman, L. G. Point by point: Reply to Hurley. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7, 649-651. (b)

Bolman, L. G. Some effects of trainers on their groups: A partial replication. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9, 534-539.

Foa, U. G. Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. Psychological Review, 1961, 68, 341-353.

Hurley, J. R. The neglected effects of trainers on t groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7, 647-649.

Hurley, J. R. Conflicting interpretations of the effects of trainers on t-groups. Proceedings, 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973, 8, 525-526.

Lieberman, M. A. , Yalom, I. D. , & Miles, M. B. Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

McQuitty, L. L. Elementary linkage analysis for isolating both orthogonal types and typal relevancies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1957, 17, 207-229.

Schriesheim, C. , & Kerr, S. Psychometric qualities of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 756-765.