Interpersonal Challenge: A Source of Growth in Laboratory Training

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that growth in human relations training is furthered by working through challenging personal relationships. A high-challenge relationship is one in which the parties hold expectations that are not fulfilled by the other's behavior, so that interaction is problematic. In this study, interpersonal expectations and behavior styles were measured with Leary's Interpersonal Check List. Greater individual growth, as measured by a "Critical Incidents" Questionnaire, occurred in high-challenge dyads; groups that made the greatest progress according to trainer ratings contained many high-challenge pairings. In highgrowth groups, a greater proportion of energy and activity was focused on high-challenge relationships than in low-growth groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyris, C. The incompleteness of social-psychological theory. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 893-908.

Bass, B. M. Reactions to "12 Angry Men" as a measure of sensitivity training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1962, 46, 120-124.

Bunker, D. R. Individual applications of laboratory training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 131-148.

Clark, J. V. , & Culbert, S. A. Mutually therapeutic perception and self-awareness in a t group. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 180-194.

Harrison, R. , & Lubin, B. Personal style, group composition, and learning, Part I. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 286-294(a).

Harrison, R. , & Lubin, B. Personal style, group composition, and learning, Part II. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965, 1, 294-301. (b)

Jackson, D. D. Family interaction, family homeostasis, and some implications for conjoint family psychotherapy. In J. Masserman (Ed.), Individual and familial dynamics. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1959. Pp. 122-141.

Kolb, D. A. , Winter, S. K. , & Berlew, D. E. Self-directed changes: Two studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, 453-472.

Leary, T. Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald, 1957.

10.

Lieberman, M. A. The influence of group composition on changes in affective approach. In D. Stock and H. A. Thelen (Eds.), Emotional dynamics and group culture. Washington, D.C.: National Training Laboratories, 1958. Pp. 131-139.

11.

Luborsky, L. , Chandler, M. , Auerbach, A. , Cohen, J. , & Bachrach, H. Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 75, 145-185.

12.

Maddi, S. R. The pursuit of consistency and variety. In R. P. Abelson , E. Aronson , W. J. McGuire , T. M. Newcomb , M. J. Rosenberg , and P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.

13.

Mead, G. H. Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

14.

Miles, M. B. Learning processes and outcomes in human relations training: A clinical-experimental study. In E. Schein and W. Bennis (Eds.), Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley, 1965. Pp. 244-254.

15.

Parsons, T. The social system. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1950.

16.

Powers, J. R. Trainer orientation and group composition in laboratory training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Institute of Technology, 1965.

17.

Sarbin, T. R. Role theory. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1954.

18.

Schein, E. , & Bennis, W. (Eds.) Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley, 1965.

19.

White, R. W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 297-334.

20.

Wynne, L. C. , Ryckoff, I. M. , Day, J. , & Hirsch, S. I. Pseudo-mutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics. In N. W. Bell and E. Z. Vogel (Eds.), The family. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1960.