Analytic Systems, Inc.An analysis of WIN Program termination data (fiscal year 1970). Prepared for Office of Policy, Evaluation, and Research, Manpower Administration, U.S. Dept of Labor, Washington, D.C., 1971.
2.
Auerbach Corporation. An appraisal of the Work Incentive Program. Submitted to Office of Evaluation, Manpower Administration, U.S. Dept of Labor, Washington, D.C., 1970.
3.
Campbell, Donald T.Methods for the experimenting society. Paper delivered to the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., September 5, 1971.
4.
Campbell, Donald T.Comments on the comment by Shaver and Staines. American Psychologist, February 1972, 27, 164-164.
5.
Goodwin, Leonard. The historical-philosophical basis for uniting social science with social problem solving. Philosophy of Science, October 1962, 29, 377-392.
6.
Goodwin, Leonard. Conceptualizing the action process. Sociology and Social Research, April 1966, 50, 377-392.
7.
Goodwin, Leonard. On making social research relevant to public policy and national problem-solving. American Psychologist, May 1971, 26, 431-442.
8.
Goodwin, Leonard. Summary of Conference on Manpower Services for the Poor (November 14-16, 1971). Submitted to the Manpower Administration, U.S. Dept of Labor, Washington, D.C., 1972. (a)
9.
Goodwin, Leonard. Do the poor want to work?A social-psychological study of work orientations. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1972. (b)
10.
Korman, A. K.Expectancies as determinants of performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, June 1971, 55, 218-222.
11.
Matthews, D. R., & Stimson, J. A.Decision-making by U.S. Representatives: A preliminary model. In S. Sidney Ulmer (Ed.), Political decision-making. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970. Pp. 14-43.
12.
Mead, George H.The philosophy of the present. Chicago: Open Court Pub. Co., 1932.
13.
National Academy of Sciences and Social Science Research Council. The behavioral and social sciences: Outlook and needs. (The Behavioral and Social Sciences Survey.) Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
14.
National Science Board, Special Commission on the Social Sciences. Knowledge into action: Improving the nation's use of the social sciences. (O. G. Brim, Jr., editor.) Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1969.
15.
Nelson, Bryce. Psychologists: Searching for social relevance at APA meeting. Science, September 1969, 165, 1101-1104.
16.
Nixon, Richard. Remarks of the President at the Republican Governors' Conference (April 19, 1971). Washington, D.C.: Office of the White House Press Secretary, 1971.
17.
Orlans, Harold. The non-profit research institute. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
18.
Rivlin, Alice M.Systematic thinking for social action. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1971.
19.
Roessner, J. David. Employment contexts and disadvantaged workers. (Processed by Bureau of Social Science Research.) Prepared for Office of Research and Development, Manpower Administration, U.S. Dept of Labor, Washington, D.C., 1971.
20.
Rosenberg, Milton J.The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In Robert Rosenthal and Ralph Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavior research. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
21.
U.S. Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social and Rehabilitation Service, National Center for Social Statistics. Public assistance statistics, May 1972. Table 1.
22.
U.S. Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, Welfare Administration. Welfare in review, Statistical supplement. 1966 edition. Table 3.
23.
U.S. Dept of Labor, Manpower Administration. Work Incentive Program handbook: BWTP manual. Washington, D.C.: the Administration, 1968.