Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The rise of generative AI presents both opportunities and challenges for organizations as they navigate unprecedented societal, political, and technological transformations. AI's growing influence brings fundamental questions about work, expertise, decision-making, and organizational behavior. This Special Forum on “What AI Knows: Shaping Work and Pushing Ideas on Changing Organizations”, explores the transformative influence of AI on the organization of change and organizations that change. Through a collection of thought-provoking contributions, it explores how organizations can navigate these challenges, balancing the risks and opportunities presented by AI. Ultimately, the forum aims to push the boundaries of understanding how AI will shape the future of work, organizational change, and leadership practices, and urges ongoing inquiry into AI's future impact on organizations, pushing boundaries for innovation and strategic thinking.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence organizational change work organization decision-making,innovation expertise leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ågnes

J. S.

(2022). Gaining and training a digital colleague: Employee responses to robotization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211043596

Ancona

Backman

Isaacs

(2019). Nimble leadership: Walking the line between creativity and chaos. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 74–83.

Beer

(2009). High commitment, high performance: How to build a resilient organization for sustained advantage. Jossey-Bass.

Cedering Ångström

(2023). Dancing with the dynamic machine. Stockholm School of Economics.

Galbraith

J. R.

(2014). Organization design challenges resulting from big data. Journal of Organization Design, 3(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.8856 .

Oswick

(2024). Generative artificial intelligence and generative conversations: Contrasting futures for organizational change? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863241232412

Prahalad

C. K.

(2011). Can relevance and rigor coexist? In Mohrman

S. A.

Lawler

E. E.

(Eds.), Useful research: Advancing theory and practice (pp. 137–146). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Raelin

J. A.

(1986). The clash of cultures: Managers and professionals. Harvard Business School Press.

Roush

(2006). Marvin Minsky on common sense and computers that emote. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2006/07/13/228604/marvin-minsky-on-common-sense-and-computers-that-emote/.

10.

Schwarz

G. M.

Bouckenooghe

Vakola

(2021). Organizational change failure: Framing the process of failing. Human Relations, 74(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720942297

11.

Simon

H. A.

(1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 .

12.

Suchman

M. C.

(1995). Managing legitimacy—Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 .

13.

Toffler

(1970). Future shock. Random House.

14.

Trigeorgis

Reuer

J. J.

(2017). Real options theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2593 .

15.

Zuboff

(1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books.