AlvessonM.GabrielY.PaulsenR. (2017). Return to meaning: A social science with something to say. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
BartunekJ. M. (2014). Academic–practitioner relationships: What NTL started and what management scholarship keeps developing. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50, 401-422.
3.
BeverungenA.BohmS.LandC. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19, 929-938. doi:10.1177/1350508412448858
4.
BradfordD. L.BurkeW. W. (2004). Is OD in crisis?Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 369-373.
5.
BurkeW. W. (1976). Organization development in transition. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 22-43.
6.
GreinerL. E.CummingsT. G. (2004). Wanted OD more alive than dead!Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 374-391.
7.
KahnR. L. (1974). Organizational development: Some problems and proposals. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10, 485-502.
8.
MillerA. N.TaylorS. G.BedeianA. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16, 422-445.
9.
MirvisP. H. (2014). JABS at 50: Applied behavioral science and something more?Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50, 371-400. doi:10.1177/0021886314549924
10.
SchwarzG. M.CummingsC.CummingsT. G. (2017). Devolution of researcher care in organization studies and the moderation of organizational knowledge. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16, 70-83.
11.
SchwarzG. M.StensakerI. (2014). Time to take off the theoretical straightjacket and (re-)introduce phenomenon-driven research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50, 478-501.
12.
WoodmanR. W. (2005). Our legacy and the future. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 7-8.