FanelliD.LoannidisJ. (2013). US studiesmayoverestimate effect sizes in softer research. PNAS. Advance online publication. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302997110
2.
LevineT.AsadaK.CarpenterC. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286-302.
3.
MedinJ.EkbergK.NordlundA.EklundJ. (2008). Organisational change, job strain and increased risk of stroke? A pilot study. Work, 31, 443-449.
4.
SlavinR. E.SmithD. (2009). The relationship between sample sizes and effect sizes in systematic reviews in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 500-506.