BeardJ. W.WoodmanR. W.MoeselD. (1998). Using behavioral modification to change attendance patterns in the high-performance, high-commitment environment. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 11, pp. 159-181). Stamford, CN: JAI Press.
2.
BullockR. J.SvyantekD. J. (1983). Positive-findings bias in positive-findings bias research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 221-224.
3.
BullockR. J.SvyantekD. J. (1985). Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 108-115.
4.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
5.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.PeracchioL. (1990). Quasi experimentation. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 491-576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
FriedlanderF.BrownL. D. (1974). Organization development. Annual Review of Psychology, 25, 313-341.
7.
GrantA. M.WallT. D. (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 653-686.
8.
KerlingerF. N.LeeH. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
MacyB. A.IzumiH. (1993). Organizational change, design, and work innovation: A meta-analysis of 131 North American field studies—1961-1991. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 7, pp. 235-313). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
10.
PasmoreW. A.StymneB.ShaniA. B.MohrmanS. A.AdlerN. (2008). The promise of collaborative management research. In ShaniA. B.MohrmanS. A.PasmoreW. A.StymneB.AdlerN. (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 7-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
PasmoreW. A.WoodmanR. W.SimmonsA. L. (2008). Toward a more rigorous, reflective, and relevant science of collaborative management research. In ShaniA. B.MohrmanS. A.PasmoreW. A.StymneB.AdlerN. (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 567-582). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
RobertsonP. J.RobertsD. R.PorrasJ. I. (1993). An evaluation of a model of planned organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 7, pp. 1-39). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13.
RynesS. L.BartunekJ. M.DaftR. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
14.
SchwarzG. M. (2009). Elephant on a treadmill: An evaluation of thematic narrowness in organizational change research. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A.ShaniA. B. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 17, pp. 301-348). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
15.
SchwarzG. M. (2012). Shaking fruit out of the tree: Temporal effects and life cycle in organizational change research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48, 342-379.
TerpstraD. E. (1981). Relationship between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in organizational development evaluation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 541-543.
18.
WoodmanR. W. (1989). Evaluation research on organizational change: Arguments for a “combined paradigm” approach. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 3, pp. 161-180). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19.
WoodmanR. W.BinghamJ. B.YuanF. (2008). Assessing organization development and change interventions. In CummingsT. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organization development (pp. 187-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
WoodmanR. W.WayneS. J. (1985). An investigation of positive-findings bias in evaluation of organization development interventions. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 889-913.