AdamiH. O. (1993). What is progress against cancer?Cancer Causes & Control, 4, 483-487. doi:10.1007/Bf00050868
2.
BaumJ. A. C. (2011). European and North American approaches to organizations and strategy research: An Atlantic divide? Not. Organization Science, 22, 1663-1679. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0609
3.
BrownC. R.Bomberger BrownM. (2013). Where has all the road kill gone?Current Biology, 23, R233-R234. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.023
4.
BurkeW. W. (2011). A perspective on the field of organization development and change: The Zeigarnik Effect. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 143-167. doi:10.1177/0021886310388161
5.
FayS. B. (1947). The idea of progress. American Historical Review, 52, 231-246. doi:10.2307/1841272
6.
GordonR. A.HowellJ. E. (1959). Higher education for business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
KhuranaR.SpenderJ. C. (2012). Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than “a problem in organizational design.”Journal of Management Studies, 49, 619-639. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01040.x
8.
LozeauD.LangleyA.DenisJ. L. (2002). The corruption of managerial techniques by organizations. Human Relations, 55, 537-564. doi:10.1177/0018726702055005427
9.
MirvisP. H.BergD. N. (1977). Failures in organization development and change: Cases and essays for learning. New York, NY: Wiley.
10.
PettigrewA. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267-292. doi:10.1287/Orsc.1.3.267
11.
PettigrewA. M.WoodmanR. W.CameronK. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 697-713. doi:10.2307/3069411
12.
PiersonF. C. (1959). The education of American businessmen: A study of university-college programs in business administration. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
PollardS. (1968). The idea of progress: History and society. London, England: Watts.
14.
RousseauD. M. (2006). 2005 Presidential address: Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”?Academy of Management Review, 31, 256-269.
15.
SchwarzG. M. (2012). Shaking fruit out of the tree: Temporal effects and life cycle in organizational change research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48, 342-379. doi:10.1177/0021886312439098
16.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
Van de VenA. H.SunK. (2011). Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 58-74.
18.
WoodmanR. W. (1989). Organizational change and development: New arenas for inquiry and action. Journal of Management, 15, 205-228. doi:10.1177/014920638901500205
19.
WoodmanR. W.BinghamJ. B.YuanF. (2008). Assessing organization development and change interventions. In CummingsT. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organization development (pp. 187-207). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
20.
WoodmanR. W.WayneS. J. (1985). An investigation of positive-findings bias in evaluation of organization development interventions. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 889-913. doi:10.2307/256243