A parallel organization improves problem solving and decision making by liberating creative, rigorous inquiry blocked or unavailable in the formal organization. This article reports a study of a parallel organization unusual for its structure, size, and duration. Its outputs significantly affected a wide range of organizational policies in manufacturing, strategic planning, and human resources. Its structure, staffing, and process improved organizational practices, relationships, learning, and communication. The case provides a valuable extension and contrast to other cases and enlightens views of theory and practice.
AckermanL. S.WhitneyD. K. (1984). The fusion team: A model of organic and shared leadership. In AdamsJ. D. (Ed.), Transforming work (pp. 254-264). Alexandria, VA: Miles River Press.
2.
AndriopoulousC.LewisM. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696-717.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BeerM.EisenstatR. A. (2004). How to have an honest conversation about business strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(1), 82-89.
5.
BoyleR. J. (1984). Wrestling with jellyfish. Harvard Business Review, 62(3), 74-83.
6.
BusheG. R. (1987). Temporary or permanent middle-management groups: Correlates with attitudes in QWL change projects. Group & Organization Studies, 12, 23-37.
7.
BusheG. R. (1988). Developing cooperative labor-management relations in unionized factories: A multiple case study of quality circles and parallel organizations within joint quality of work life projects. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 24, 129-150.
8.
BusheG. R. (1989). Use of a parallel learning structure to implement system transforming innovations: The case of statistical process control. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 4(4), 25-31.
9.
BusheG. R.ShaniA. B. (1990). Parallel learning structure interventions in bureaucratic organizations. In WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 4, pp. 167-194). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10.
BusheG. R.ShaniA. B. (1991). Parallel learning structures: Increasing innovation in bureaucracies. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
DannaK.GriffinR. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25, 357-384.
12.
DentE. B.GoldbergS. G. (1999). Challenging “resistance to change”. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25-41.
13.
DoyleM.GelinasM.KrausW. (1984). A strategy and process for managing complex change: Parallel organization architecture. San Francisco, CA: Interaction Associates.
14.
DuncanR. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In KilmannR. H.PondyL. R.SlevinD. P. (Eds.), The management of organization design (pp. 167-188). New York, NY: North-Holland.
15.
FredbergT.NorrgrenF.ShaniA. B. (2011). Developing and sustaining change via learning mechanisms: A longitudinal perspective on transformation. In ShaniA. B.WoodmanR. W.PasmoreW. A. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 19, pp. 117-161). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
16.
FrenchW. L.BellC. H.ZawackiR. A. (2000). Organization development and transformation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
GephartR. P. (2004). Qualitative research and theAcademy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.
18.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
20.
GoldsteinS. G. (1978). A structure for change. Human Relations, 31, 957-983.
21.
GoldsteinS. G. (1985). Organizational dualism and quality circles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 504-517.
22.
GoodmanP. S.DeanJ. W. (1982). Creating long-term organizational change. In GoodmanP. S. & Associates (Eds.), Change in organizations (pp. 226-279). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
HerrickN. Q. (1985). Parallel organizations in unionized settings: Implications for organizational research. Human Relations, 38, 963-981.
24.
JickT. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
25.
JuranJ. M.DeFeoJ. A. (2010). Juran’s quality handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
KanterR. M. (1983). The change masters. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
27.
KennedyM. M. (1979). Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Quarterly, 3, 661-678.
28.
KilmannR. H. (1982). Designing collateral organizations. Human Systems Management, 3, 66-76.
29.
LawlerE. A.MohrmanS. A. (1985). Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review, 63(1), 65-71.
30.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
31.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
MillerE. C. (1978). The parallel organization structure at General Motors: An interview with Howard C. Carlson. Personnel, 55, 64-69.
33.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
MintzbergH.RaisinghaniD.TheoretA. (1976). The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246-275.
35.
MohrmanS. A.LedfordG. E. (1985). The design and use of effective participation groups: Implications for human resource management. Human Resources Management, 24, 413-428.
36.
MooreM. L. (1986). Designing parallel organizations to support organizational productivity programs. In FamularoJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human resources administration (pp. 4.1-4.18). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
MooreM. L. (1989). Issue analysis, development, and management systems: Parallel structures for public sector OD. Public Administration Quarterly, 13, 232-254.
38.
MooreM. L.MinersI. A. (1988). Hidden consequences in combining OD intervention with policy and technology approaches to absence control: Implications for consultants. Consultation, 7(2), 86-111.
39.
O’ConnorE. S. (1999). Order from chaos: Application of narrative theories and methods to organizational research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999(1), A1-A6.
40.
OregS. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 73-101.
41.
O’ReillyC. A.TushmanM. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-81.
42.
PideritS. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794.
43.
RaischS.BurkinshawJ. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.
44.
RubinsteinD.WoodmanR. W. (1984). Spiderman and the Burmese Raiders: Collateral organization theory in action. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 1-21.
45.
ScheinE. H. (2009). The corporate culture survival guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
46.
ShaniA. B. (1987). Parallel organization in a health care institution: An exploratory action research study. Group & Organizational Studies, 12, 147-173.
47.
ShaniA. B.BasurayM. T.PlaceR. W. (1986). A reconceptualization of organizational dualism: Some learnings from the biological sciences (Working paper). San Luis Obispo: School of Business, California Polytechnic State University.
48.
ShaniA. B.DochertyP. (2003). Learning by design: Building sustainable organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49.
ShaniA. B.DochertyP. (2008). Learning by design: Key mechanisms in organization development. In CummingsT. G. (Ed.), Handbook for organization development (pp. 499-518). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
ShaniA. B.EberhardtB. J. (1987). Parallel organization in a health care institution. Group & Organization Studies, 12, 147-173.
51.
ShaniA. B.PasmoreW. A.MietusJ. R. (1982, August). The use of parallel structure in a military organization: An exploratory field study. Paper presented at the 90th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
52.
SteinB. A.KanterR. M. (1980). Building the parallel organization: Creating mechanisms for permanent quality of work life. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16, 371-388.
53.
TernantG. (2001). Six sigma: SPC and TQM in manufacturing and services. Burlington, VT: Gower.
54.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
55.
TushmanM. L.O’ReillyC. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30.
56.
ZandD. E. (1974). Collateral organization: A new change strategy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10, 63-89.
57.
ZandD. E. (1981). Information, organization, and power. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
58.
ZandD. E. (1997). The leadership triad: Knowledge, trust, and power (pp. 185-208). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
