The use of metaphors in understanding organizational change has become prominent in recent years, although most research focuses on the deductive application of metaphors, rather than on inductive explorations of metaphorical language-in-use. This article extends qualitative understandings of the experience of change agency through an inductive focus on the metaphorical language-in-use of change agents. Through case study data from the United Kingdom and New Zealand, the authors explore how a group of trade unionists involved in the development of a trade (labor) union–sponsored learning initiative draw on metaphorical language to talk about their experiences. Seven different metaphors are identified and the change agency roles implied by those metaphors are analyzed. In considering the similarities and differences between managerial and union change agency, the authors argue that although some metaphors such as journey and warfare might be widespread in the accounts of both types of change agents, attention to other metaphors that share entailments with these metaphors reveals agency roles unique to the union context. The advantages and disadvantages of this novel form of qualitative data analysis are evaluated.
AlinskyS. (1946). Reveille for radicals. New York, NY: Random House.
2.
AlinskyS. (1971). Rules for radicals. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
3.
AllenP. (2001). Metaphors for change: Partnerships, tools and civic action for sustainability. Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
4.
AmernicJ.CraigR.TourishD. (2007). The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch’s letters to stockholders of General Electric. Human Relations, 60, 1839-1872.
5.
AudebrandL. K. (2010). Sustainability in strategic management education: The quest for new root metaphors. Academy of Management & Learning Education, 9, 413-428.
6.
BaconN.HoqueK. (2010). Union representation and training: The impact of union learning representatives and the factors influencing their effectiveness. Human Relations, 64, 387-413.
7.
BaglioniM. (2004). The last waltz: Are Italian trade unions leaving the dance floor? In HuzzardT.GregoryD.ScottR. (Eds.), Strategic unionism and partnership: Boxing or dancing? (pp. 142-162). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BeechN. (2000). Narrative styles of managers and workers: A tale of star-crossed lovers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 210-228.
9.
BjerknesG.PelleE.KyngM. (1987). Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
10.
BojeD. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
11.
BoudD.MiddletonH. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 194-202.
12.
BroussaineM.VinceR. (1996). Working with metaphor towards organizational change. In OswickC.GrantD. (Eds.), Organization development: Metaphorical explorations (pp. 57-72). London, England: Pitman.
13.
BrownA. D.HumphreysM. (2003). Epic and tragic tales: making sense of change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 121-144.
14.
BuchananD. (2003). Demands, instabilities, manipulations, careers: The lived experience of driving change. Human Relations, 56, 663-684.
15.
BuchananD.BoddyD. (1992). The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity. Hempstead, NY: Prentice Hall.
16.
BuchananD.StoreyJ. (1997). Role-taking and role-switching in organizational change: The four pluralities. In McCloughlinI.HarrisM. (Eds.), Innovation, organizational change and technology (pp. 127-145). London, England: International Thomson Business Press.
17.
CaldwellR. (2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 983-1004.
18.
CassellC. M.JohnsonP. (2006). Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations, 59, 783-814.
19.
CassellC. M.LeeB. (2007). Re-vitalising learning and development? The role of the trade union learning representative. Personnel Review, 36, 781-799.
20.
CassellC. M.LeeB. (2009). Trade union learning representatives: progressing partnership?Work, Employment and Society, 23, 213-230.
21.
CornelissenJ. P.KafourosM. I. (2008). The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organization Studies, 29, 957-978.
22.
CornelissenJ. P.OswickC.ChristensenA. T.PhillipsN. (2008). Metaphor in organizational research: Context, modalities and implications for research. Organization Science, 29, 7-22.
23.
DeanA. (2007). An examination of the innovative role of change agents in workplace and community settings. Exeter, England: Deal Transnational Partnership.
24.
DunnS. (1990). Root metaphor in the old and new industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 28, 1-31.
25.
DunfordR.PalmerI. (1996). Metaphors in popular management discourse: The case of corporate restructuring. In GrantD.OswickC. (Eds.), Metaphor and organizations (pp. 95-109). London, England: Sage.
26.
EdenC.HuxhamC. (1996). Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7, 75-86.
27.
FarrD. (2008). The New Zealand Learning Representatives Project: An assessment of the pilot years. Journal of In-service Education, 34(4), 513-526.
28.
FitzgeraldI.O’BrienP. (2005). Like taking coals to Newcastle: A new era for trade unionism in the North East of England?Capital & Class, 29, 17-27.
29.
ForresterK. (2004). The quiet revolution? Trade union learning and renewal strategies. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 413-420.
30.
ForresterK.PayneJ. (2000). Trade union modernisation and lifelong learning. Research in post-compulsory education, 5, 153-171.
31.
GeigerD.AntonacopoulouE. (2009). Narratives and organizational dynamics: Exploring blind spots and organizational inertia. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 411-436.
32.
GrantD.MarshakR. J. (2011). Toward a discourse-centred understanding of organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/002188631039761210.1177/0021886310397612
33.
GregoryD. (2004). Dancing in the dark: UK unions and strategic choice. In HuzzardT.GregoryD.ScottR. (Eds.), Strategic unionism and partnership: Boxing or dancing? (pp. 69-85). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GregoryD.NilssonT. (2004). Seconds away: Naming and framing the book. In HuzzardT.GregoryD.ScottR. (Eds.), Strategic unionism and partnership: Boxing or dancing? (pp. 1-20). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
HeeryE. (2005). Sources of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 91-106.
36.
HeracleousL.JacobsC. D. (2008). Crafting strategy: The role of embodied metaphors. Long Range Planning, 41, 309-325.
37.
HuzzardT.GregoryD.ScottR. (Eds.). (2004). Strategic unionism and partnership: Boxing or dancing?Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
InnsD.JonesP. (1996). Metaphor in organization theory: Following in the footsteps of the poet? In GrantD.OswickC. (Eds.), Metaphor and organizations (pp. 110-126). London, England: Sage.
39.
KeenoyT. (1991). The roots of metaphor in new and old industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29, 313-328.
40.
KyngM. (1989). Designing for a dollar a day. Office: Technology and People, 4, 157-170.
41.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
LeeB.CassellC. M. (2008). In-service learning in the emergent learning representative initiative in New Zealand. Journal of In-Service Education, 34, 497-512.
43.
LeeB.CassellC. M. (2009). Learning organizations, employee development and learning representative schemes in the UK and New Zealand. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21, 5-22.
44.
MarshakR. J. (1993). Managing the metaphors of change. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 44-56.
45.
McIlroyJ. (2008). Ten years of new labour: Workplace learning, social partnership and union revitalization in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 283-313.
46.
MoodyK. (1997). Towards an international social movement unionism. New Left Review, 225, 52-72.
47.
MorganG. (1996). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
48.
MunroA.RainbirdH. (2004). Opening doors as well as banging on tables: An assessment of UNISON/employer partnerships on learning in the UK public sector. Industrial Relations Journal, 35, 419-433.
OswickC.GrantD. (1996b). The organization of metaphors and the metaphors of organization: Where are we and where do we go from here? In GrantD.OswickC. (Eds.), Metaphor and organizations (pp. 213-226). London, England: Sage.
51.
OttawayR. (1983). The change agent: A taxonomy in relation to the change process. Human Relations, 36, 361-392.
52.
PalmerI.DunfordR. (1996). Understanding organizations through metaphor. In OswickC.GrantD. (Eds.), Organization development metaphorical explanations (pp. 7-15). London, England: Pitman.
53.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RainbirdH.StuartM. (2011). The state and the union learning agenda in Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 25, 202-217.
56.
RhodesC.PullenA.CleggS. R. (2009). “If I should fall from grace . . .”: Stories of change and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 535-551.
57.
SackmanS. (1989). The role of metaphors in organization transformation. Human Relations, 6, 463-485.
58.
ScheinE. H. (1987). Process consultation. London, England: Sage.
59.
SchönD. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-solving in social policy. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137-163). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60.
SmithR. C.EisenbergE. M. (1987). Conflict at Disneyland: A root-metaphor analysis. Communication Monographs, 54, 367-380.
61.
SutherlandH.RainbirdH. (2000). Unions and workplace learning: Conflict or co-operation with the employer? In RainbirdH. (Ed.), Training in the workplace: Critical perspectives on learning at work (pp. 264-282). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
62.
VaaraE.TienariJ.SänttiR. (2003). The international match: Metaphors as vehicles of social-identity building in cross-border mergers. Human Relations, 56, 419-451.
63.
WaistellJ. (2006). Metaphorical mediation of organizational change across space and time. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 640-654.
64.
WallisE.StuartM.GreenwoodI. (2005). “Learners of the workplace unite!”: An empirical examination of the UK trade union learning representative initiative. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 283-304.
65.
WeickK. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
66.
WhittleA.SuhomlinovaO.MuellerF. (2010). Funnel of interests: The discursive translation of organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46, 16-37.
67.
ZilberT. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234-254.
