This article builds on findings from 6 years of action research on change dynamics in the Dutch diplomatic arena concerned with tough issues such as dispensing foreign aid to reduce poverty. The complexity of tough issues can only be handled effectively with intensive local participation. Such participation is not straightforward as people may shy away from the unfamiliar repertoires, unpredictable processes, and inevitable opposition that come with the territory. This article focuses on how to facilitate local ownership in a series of paradoxical interventions with sufficient depth and credibility. It describes the dynamics enabling and frustrating the helping relationship during the initiation and execution of complex change.
BartunekJ. M.RousseauD. M.RudolphJ. W.DePalmaJ. A. (2006). On the receiving end. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 182-206.
2.
BeisserA. (1970). The paradoxical theory of change. In FaganJ.ShepherdI. (Eds.), Gestalt therapy now (pp. 77-81). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
3.
BrownA. D.StarkeyK. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 102-120.
4.
BrownJ. S.DuguidP. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40-57.
5.
BusheG. R.MarshakR. J. (2007). Revisioning organization development: A post modernist perspective. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6.
ChurchmanC. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
7.
De DreuC. K. W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 66-78.
8.
De GeusA. P. (1997). The living company: Habits for survival in a turbulent business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
DentE. B.Galloway GoldbergS. (1999). Challenging resistance to change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25-41.
10.
DodgsonM. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14, 375-394.
11.
DukeR. D.GeurtsJ. L. A. (2004). Policy games for strategic management: Pathways into the unknown. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Dutch University Press.
12.
DunphyD. (1996). Organizational change in corporate settings. Human Relations, 49, 541-552.
13.
EdenC.HuxhamC. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NorthW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 526-543). London, England: SAGE.
14.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
15.
EngeströmY. (1994). Training for change: New approach to instruction and learning in working life. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.
16.
FrenchR. (2001). Negative capability: Managing the confusing uncertainties of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14, 480-492.
17.
GeschkaH. (1978). Introduction and use of idea-generating methods. Research Management, 3, 25-28.
18.
HarpazY. (2005). Teaching and learning in a community of thinking. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 20, 136-157.
19.
HendriksJ. (1987). Lastige klanten: Een interactioneel perspectief [Difficult clients: An interactional perspective]. Management & Organisatie, 1, 6-21.
20.
HeronJ. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research in the human condition. London, England: SAGE.
21.
HirschhornL. (1988). The workplace within: Psychodynamics of organizational life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London, England: Routledge.
24.
KeganR.LaheyL. L. (2001). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
KrackhardtD. (2001). Viscocity models and the diffusion of controversial innovations. In LomiA.LarsenE. R. (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations (pp. 243-269). Boston: MIT Press.
26.
MeyersonD.WeickK. E.KramerR. M. (1996). Swift trust in temporary work groups. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 166-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
MitrofI. I.SagastiF. (1973). Epistemology as general systems theory: An approach to the design of complex decision-making experiments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 3, 117-134.
28.
OrlikowskiW. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63-92.
29.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
RevansR. (1998). ABC of action learning: Empowering managers to act and to learn from action. London, UK: Lemos & Crane.
31.
ScheinE. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
32.
ScheinE. H. (2001). Clinical inquiry/research. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 266-280). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
ScheinE. H. (2010). The leader as helper. Lecture at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Montreal, Quebec.
34.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
SeoM.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222-247.
36.
StoppelenburgA.VermaakH. (2009). “Defixation” as an intervention perspective: Understanding wicked problems at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Journal of Management Enquiry, 18, 50-54.
37.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
van de LooE. L. H. M. (2007). The art of listening. In Kets de VriesM.KorotovK.Florent-TreacyE.Coach or couch (pp. 221-239). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
VermaakH. (2009). Plezier beleven aan taaie vraagstukken: Werkingsmechanismen van vernieuwing en weerbarstigheid [Enjoying tough issues: Dynamics of innovation and stagnation]. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer.
40.
VermeulenF. (2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 978-982.
41.
VermuntJ. D.VerloopN. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
42.
WatzlawickP.Baevin BavelasJ.JacksonD. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York, NY: Norton.
43.
WierdsmaA. (2004). Beyond implementation: Co-creation in change and development. In BoonstraJ. J. (Ed.), Dynamics in organizational change and learning (pp. 227-259). Chicester, England: Wiley.
44.
WorleyC. G. (2009). A response to A. Stoppelenburg & H. Vermaak: “Defixation” as process intervention. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 55-57.
45.
WorlineM. C.QuinnR. W. (2003). Courageous principled action. In CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 138-159). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
