There is growing concern within the Academy of Management that a big and growing gap exists between management research and practice. The persistence of this gap is a mystery! Over the past 20 years, literally hundreds of ideas have been proposed to close it. Yet nothing seems to work and according to some, the gap continues to grow. Why is that? Is it that all the ideas proposed are bad or are we simply guilty of not implementing our own ideas in a manifestation of the “knowledge—doing gap”? In this article, the author proposes that a much more serious issue may be at work. Specifically, the author argues that our research is (sufficiently) relevant but still not what our customers (i.e., the managers) want or need. The gap that exists is not between rigorous and relevant research; it is between relevant and useful knowledge. For our (relevant) research to become managerially useful, it still needs to go through a transformation. Unfortunately, academics are not good at this transformation process. This has a serious implication on what we actually need to do to make our research more managerially useful.
The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Task Force. (2007, April 4). Report of the Impact of Research Task Force to the AACSB International Board of Directors (Unpublished draft). Tampa, FL: Author.
2.
Abrahamson, E. ( 1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254-285.
3.
Aldag, R.J. ( 1997). Moving sofas and exhuming woodchucks: On relevance, impact and the following of fads. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6, 8-16.
4.
Ariely, D. ( 2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: HarperCollins .
5.
Bartunek, J.M., & Rynes, S.L. ( 2010). The construction and contributions of "Implications for Practice": What’s in them and what might they offer?Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 100-117.
6.
Bennis, W.G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104.
7.
Beyer, J.M. ( 1982). Introduction to the special issue on the utilization of organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly , 27, 588-590.
8.
Caves, R. ( 2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Garland, H. ( 1999). Management research and management practice: Learning from our colleagues in economics. In L. Larwood & U. E. Gattiker (Eds.), Impact analysis: How research can enter application and make a difference (pp. 129-135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Gulati, R. ( 2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal , 50, 775-782.
11.
Hambrick, D.C. ( 1994). What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11-16.
12.
Holstein, W. ( 2005, June 19). Are business schools failing the world?The New York Times, p. 13.
13.
Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. ( 2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 516-533.
14.
Markides, C. ( 2007). In search of ambidextrous professors. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 762-768.
15.
Markides, C., & Geroski, P. ( 2005). Fast second: How smart companies bypass radical innovation to enter and dominate new markets. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
McGahan, A. ( 2007). Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers and turnips. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 748-753.
17.
Mowday, R.T. ( 1997). Presidential address: Reaffirming our scholarly values . Academy of Management Review, 22, 335-345.
18.
Oviatt, B.M., & Miller, W.D. ( 1989). Irrelevance, intransigence, and business professors. Academy of Management Executive, 3, 304-312.
19.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. ( 2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R.I. ( 2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
Porter, M.E. ( 1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
Porter, M.E. ( 1996). What is strategy?Harvard Business Review , 74(6), 61-78.
23.
Price, R.L. ( 1995). A customer’s view of organizational literature . In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in organizational sciences (2nd ed., pp. 98-107). London , England: Sage.
24.
Rynes, S.L., Bartunek, J.M., & Daft, R.L. ( 2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
25.
Shapiro, D.L., Kirkman, B.L., & Courtney, H.G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 249-266.
26.
Staw, B.M. ( 1995). Repairs on the road to relevance and rigor: Some unexplored issues in publishing organizational research. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in organizational sciences (2nd ed., pp. 85-97). London, England: Sage.
27.
Thaler, R.H., & Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin.
28.
Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C., III. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-81.
29.
Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C., III. (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 769-774.
30.
Vermeulen, F. ( 2005). On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 978-982.
31.
Vermeulen, F. ( 2007). I shall not remain insignificant: Adding a second loop to matter more. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 754-761.
