This study investigates main effects of differences in workers (age, sex, and tenure) in conjunction with relevant contextual factors that moderate these main effects on individuals’ procedural justice judgments. Studying 820 employees who underwent change in their respective organizations, the authors found that the positive relationship between unit-level justice context and individual-level judgment of justice is stronger when workers’ personal jobs have low impact and when individuals are similar in age to others in the work unit. Men are more likely than women to view change-related management actions as just, but this relationship is not significant if the organization has undergone shifts in power structures concurrent with the focal change. Tenure relates positively with personal procedural justice judgment but only when the organization has recently changed the types of people it hires. The results have implications for organizations by informing managers that their change-related actions will not necessarily be translated similarly by all individuals participating in the change.
Armenakis, A.A., & Bedeian, A.G. ( 1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293-315.
2.
Ashford, S.J. ( 1988). Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 19-36.
3.
Ashford, S.J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. ( 1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 803-829.
4.
Avery, D.R., McKay, P.F., & Wilson, D.C. ( 2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with co-workers, and employee engagement . Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1542-1556.
5.
Bliese, P.D. ( 2000). Within group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Brockner, J. ( 2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58-76.
7.
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R.J. ( 1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397-409.
8.
Burke, W., & Litwin, G. ( 1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change . Journal of Management, 18, 523-545.
9.
Caldwell, S.D., Farmer, S.M., & Fedor, D.B. ( 2008). The influence of age on volunteer contributions in a nonprofit organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 29, 311-333.
10.
Caldwell, S.D., Herold, D.M., & Fedor, D.B. ( 2004). Towards an understanding of the relationships between organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 868-882.
11.
Chatman, J.A., Polzer, J.T., Barsade, S.G., & Neale, M.A. ( 1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition on organizational culture in work processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
12.
Chattopadhyay, P. ( 1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
13.
Cobb, A.T., Wooten, K., & Folger, R. ( 1995). Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 8, pp. 243-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
14.
Colquitt, J.A. ( 2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633-646.
15.
Colquitt, J.A., Noe, R.A., & Jackson, C.L. ( 2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109.
16.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D.E., & Gilliland, S.W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34-48.
17.
Ely, R., & Padavic, I. ( 2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1121-1143.
18.
Fedor, D.B., Caldwell, S., & Herold, D.M. ( 2006). The effects of organizational changes on employee commitment: A multilevel investigation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 1-29.
19.
Fedor, D.B., Rensvold, R.B., & Adams, S.M. ( 1992). An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology , 45, 779-802.
20.
Foley, S., Hang-Yue, N., & Wong, A. ( 2005). Perceptions of discrimination and justice: Are there gender differences in outcomes? Group & Organization Management , 30, 421-450.
21.
Folger, R. ( 1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
22.
Groysberg, B. ( 2008, February). How star women build portable skills. Harvard Business Review, pp. 74-81.
23.
Herold, D.M., Caldwell, S.D., & Fedor, D.B. ( 2007). The effects of change context and self efficacy on commitment to change: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology , 92, 942-951.
24.
Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J.P. ( 2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474-487.
25.
Hofmann, D.A. ( 1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
26.
House, R.J., Shane, S.A., & Herold, D.M. ( 1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21, 203-224.
27.
Jackson, S.E., Brett, J.F., Sessa, V.I., Cooper, D.M., Julin, J.A., & Peyronnin, M. ( 1991). Some differences make a difference: Individuals dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotion, and turnover . Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
28.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. ( 1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
29.
Janz, B.D., Colquitt, J.A., & Noe, R.A. ( 1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50, 877-904.
30.
Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Jackson, S.E. ( 2006). Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 459-481.
31.
Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T.M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122.
32.
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P.L. (2004). Aging, adult development and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440-458.
33.
Korsgaard, M.A., Schweiger, D.M., & Sapienza, H.J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in top management teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
34.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. ( 2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Lau, C.M., & Woodman, R.W. ( 1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective . Academy of Management Journal, 38, 537-554.
36.
Lewin, K. ( 1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Lind, E.A., & van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181-224). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
38.
Lott, B. ( 1988). Separate spheres revisited. Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, 55-62.
39.
Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C.L. ( 1998). A multi-level analysis of procedural justice context . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141.
40.
Nadler, D.A. ( 1982, Summer). Managing transitions to uncertain future states . Organizational Dynamics, pp. 37-45.
41.
Naumann, S.E., & Bennett, N. ( 2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multi-level model. Academy of Management Journal , 43, 881-889.
42.
Roberson, Q.M., & Colquitt, J.A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595-607.
43.
Ryan, M.K., & Haslam, S.A. ( 2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549-572.
44.
Schweiger, D., & DeNisi, A. (1991). Communications with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 110-135.
45.
Siegel, P.A., Post, C., Brockner, J., Fishman, A.Y., & Garden, C. ( 2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 13-24.
46.
Shapiro, D.L., & Kirkman, B.L. ( 1999). Employees’ reactions to the change to work teams: The influence of "anticipatory" injustice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 51-66.
47.
Starbuck, W.H., & Milliken, F. ( 1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods of studying top managers (pp. 35-65). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
48.
Turner, J.C. ( 1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 47-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
49.
Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. ( 1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
50.
Vogel, D.L., Webster, S.R., Heesacker, M., & Madon, S. ( 2003). Confirming sex stereotypes: A social role perspective . Sex Roles, 48, 519-528.
51.
Wagner, W.G., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.
52.
Wanberg, C.R., & Banas, J.T. ( 2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 132-142.
53.
Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E., & Austin, J.T. ( 2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measuring antecedents and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25, 132-153.
