The hypothesis underpinning this philosophical reflection on Schein's notion of clinical inquiry/research is that clinical inquiry/research has solid foundations in the operations of human cognition and in the nature of the realm of practical knowing. The reflection draws on the work of the philosopher Bernard Lonergan, who articulates both a clear account of the operations of human knowing and of the realm of practical knowing where knowledge is contextually embedded, and there is a primary concern for the practical and the particular. The purpose of engaging in this philosophical reflection is to articulate the epistemic grounds on which clinical inquiry/research is based to aid clinical researchers to understand and appropriate its vibrant philosophy. The aim is to provide scholar-practitioners with an epistemology, a methodology, and an array of methods to conduct clinical inquiry/research.
Argyris, C. (2003). Actionable knowledge. In T. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 423-452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Coghlan, D. (2000). Interlevel dynamics in clinical inquiry. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(2), 190-200.
4.
Coghlan, D. (2008a). Exploring insight: The role of insight in a general empirical method in action research for organization change and development . Revue Science de Gestion, 65, 343-355.
5.
Coghlan, D. (2008b). Authenticity as first person practice: An exploration based on Bernard Lonergan. Action Research, 6(3), 369-384.
6.
Coghlan, D., & McDonagh, J. (2001). Research and practice in IT-related change: The case for clinical inquiry. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 13, pp. 195-211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
7.
Coghlan, D., & Rashford, N.S. (2006). Organization change and strategy: An interlevel dynamics approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
8.
Coghlan, D., & Shani, A.B. (Rami). (2008a). Insider action research: The dynamics of developing new capabilities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 643-655). London: Sage.
9.
Coghlan, D., & Shani, A.B. (Rami). (2008b). Collaborative management research through communities of inquiry. In A. B. (Rami) Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne , & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 601-614). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
De Vos, H. (1987). Common sense and scientific thinking. In F. van Hoolthoon & D. R. Olsen (Eds.), Common sense: The foundation for social science (pp. 345-359). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
11.
Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian phronesis, Aristotelian philosophy and action research. Bern: Peter Lang.
12.
Fisher, D., Rooke, D., & Torbert, W.R. (2000). Individual and personal transformations through action inquiry. Boston: Edge\work Press.
13.
Flanagan, J. (1997). Quest for self-knowledge: An essay in Lonergan's philosophy. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
14.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Lonergan, B.J. (1992). Insight: An essay in human understanding. The collected works of Bernard Lonergan (Vol. 3, F. Crowe & R. Doran, Eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1957)
18.
Marroum, R.-M. (2004). The role of insight in science education: An introduction to the cognitional theory of Bernard Lonergan. Science & Education, 13, 519-540.
19.
Meynell, H. (1998). Redirecting philosophy: Reflections on the nature of knowledge from Plato to Lonergan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
20.
Olsen, D. (1987). Schooling and the transformation of common sense . In F. van Hoolthoon & D. R. Olsen (Eds.), Common sense: The foundation for social science (pp. 319-340). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
21.
Pasmore, W.A., Woodman, R.W., & Simmons, A.L. (2008). Toward a more rigorous, reflective and relevant science of collaborative management research. In A. B. (Rami) Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne , & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 567-582). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Quick, J.C., & Garvin, J.H. (2000). The next frontier: Edgar Schein on organizational therapy. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 31-48.
23.
Reason, P., & Torbert, W.R. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 1-38.
24.
Schein, E.H. (1987). The clinical perspective in fieldwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Schein, E.H. (1993a). Legitimizing clinical research in the study of organizational culture. Journal of Counseling and Development , 71, 703-708.
26.
Schein, E.H. (1993b). The academic as artist: Personal and professional roots. In A. G. Bedeian (Ed.), Management laureates (Vol. 3, pp. 31-62). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Schein, E.H. (1995). Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: Are they the same? Journal of Managerial Psychology , 10(6), 14-19.
28.
Schein, E.H. (1997). Organizational learning: What is new? In M. A. Rahim, R. T. Golembiewski, & L. E. Pate (Eds.), Current topics in management (Vol. 2, pp. 11-26). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
Schein, E.H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
30.
Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Schein, E.H. (2006). From brainwashing to organizational therapy: A conceptual and empirical journey in search of `systemic' health and a general model of change dynamics. A drama in five acts. Organization Studies, 27(2), 287-301.
32.
Schein, E.H. (2008). Clinical inquiry/research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 266-279). London: Sage.
33.
Schon, D.A. (1995, November/December). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27(6), 27-34.
34.
Shani, A. B. (Rami), Mohrman, S. A., Pasmore, W. A., Stymne, B., & Adler, N. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Susman, G.I., & Evered, R.D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-601.
36.
Tekippe, T. (1996). Scientific and primordial knowing. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
37.
Tenkasi, R.V., & Hay, G.W. (2008). Following the second legacy of Aristotle: The scholar-practitioner as an epistemic technician. In A. B. (Rami) Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne , & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 49-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
van Hoolthoon, F., & Olsen, D.R. (1987). Common sense: The foundation for social science . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
39.
Webb, E. (1988). Philosophers of consciousness: Polanyi, Lonergan, Voegelin, Ricoeur, Girard, Kierkegaard. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
